Role of laparoscopic surgery in the management of endometrial cancer

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73190, USA.
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network: JNCCN (Impact Factor: 4.18). 06/2009; 7(5):559-67.
Source: PubMed


Minimum surgical treatment for endometrial cancer is removal of the uterus. The operative approach to achieve that goal ranges from vaginal hysterectomy alone to laparotomy with radical hysterectomy, bilateral salpingoophorectomy, bilateral pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy with possible omentectomy, and resection of all metastatic disease. Stratifying the risk factors for predicting presence of metastatic disease has error rates exceeding tolerance for many gynecologic oncologists. Most accept routine laparoscopic surgical staging with hysterectomy, pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy, and removal of adnexa as standard care for patients with endometrial cancer. Modifying the extent of surgical staging for low-risk intrauterine findings or excessive risk for postoperative morbidity is also accepted. Laparoscopic surgery has become the ideal initial surgical approach for this disease, allowing for visual inspection of common metastatic sites, biopsy of abnormal areas, and cytology from peritoneal surfaces. The extent of staging can be altered depending on frozen section findings from the uterus, adnexa, and peritoneal surfaces. Intraoperative medical decision-making can be individualized, encompassing all known risk factors for metastases and balancing comorbidities and potential adverse outcomes. This article documents how laparoscopic surgery satisfies the needs of individual patients and surgeons treating this disease.

1 Read
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, clinical outcome and complications of laparoscopic surgery in women with endometrial cancer and to compare surgical outcome and postoperative early and late complications with results of traditional laparotomy. Forty women with endometrial cancer underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Each patient operated by laparoscopy was matched by age, preoperative clinical stage and histology of the endometrial cancer with a patient treated by the same operation but using traditional laparotomy. Half of these patients underwent total pelvic lymphadenectomy and half had pelvic lymph node sampling. The groups were compared in clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes, recoveries and early and late postoperative complications. The patients in the laparoscopy group had less blood loss, more lymph nodes removed, shorter hospital stay but longer operation time than those treated by laparotomy. Only one (2.5%) laparoscopy was converted to laparotomy due to pelvic adhesions. There were no intraoperative complications in either group. Postoperative complications were more common (55.0%) in the laparotomy than in the laparoscopy group (37.5%). Only one major complication (2.5%) occurred among patients undergoing laparoscopy as compared with three (7.5%) major complications in the laparotomy group. Superficial wound infection was the most common (20%) infection in laparotomy patients while vaginal cuff cellulitis occurred in 10% of laparoscopy patients. Late (>42 days) postoperative complications were almost equally frequent (20.0 and 22.5%) in both groups. Lower extremity lymph edema or pelvic lymph cyst was found in 12.5% of all cases. As a result of surgical staging the disease of 6 women (15%) in both groups was upgraded. Laparoscopic surgery is a viable alternative to traditional surgery in the management of endometrial cancer. The surgical outcome is similar in both cases. In laparoscopic procedures the operation time is longer but the postoperative recovery time shorter than in laparotomy. Severe complications were limited in both groups, while wound infections can be avoided using laparoscopy.
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 07/2004; 270(1):25-30. DOI:10.1007/s00404-003-0488-7 · 1.36 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Endometrial cancer is the most common form of gynaecological cancer. Laparotomy has traditionally been the surgical treatment of choice, but the laparoscopic approach is gaining wider acceptance by gynaecologic surgeons, and an abundance of clinical information is currently available on all aspects of this approach. Whether in combination with laparoscopic-assisted vaginal or total laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic staging, including salpingo-oophorectomy and regional lymph-node dissection, is a major component of the treatment of patients with early endometrial cancer. This review examines the various options to treating endometrial cancer and proposes that laparoscopically assisted surgical staging of endometrial cancer is both a feasible and safe option. Comparative analyses of survival and recurrence rates for patients treated by laparoscopy and laparotomy have shown similar survival results. It remains to be proven if these laparoscopic techniques are associated with greater benefits.
    Gynecological Surgery 11/2006; 3(4):245-252. DOI:10.1007/s10397-006-0223-z
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: While abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy is still considered the gold standard for the surgical treatment of endometrial cancer, the laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) plus laparoscopic lymphadenectomy has been performed in FIGO stage I endometrial cancer in selected centers for about a decade. Clinical studies have shown that the frequency of intra- and postoperative complications, the pelvic and paraaortic lymph node yield, and—more importantly—the overall survival, are similar both with the laparoscopic-assisted vaginal approach and the abdominal approach in stage I disease. Blood loss and duration of hospital stay may even be reduced with the LAVH. In summary, provided there is compliance with established oncologic guidelines, LAVH with pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy can probably be performed in patients with endometrial cancer FIGO stage I without safety loss.
    Gynecological Surgery 03/2007; 4(1):3-7. DOI:10.1007/s10397-006-0222-0
Show more