Article

Tenofovir-associated renal and bone toxicity.

The Mortimer Market Centre, Camden PCT, London, UK.
HIV Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.45). 06/2009; 10(8):482-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2009.00716.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aims of the study were to describe the clinical presentation and renal and bone abnormalities in a case series of HIV-infected patients receiving treatment with tenofovir (TDF), and to recommend appropriate screening for toxicity related to TDF.
Patients were identified from referrals to a specialist HIV renal clinic. Patients were included if treatment with TDF was assessed as the primary cause of the renal function impairment and clinical data were available prior to and following discontinuation of TDF treatment. Data were collected from case note review and clinic databases.
Twenty-two patients (1.6% of all those who received TDF) were identified with TDF-associated renal toxicity. All had normal serum creatinine prior to TDF therapy. All presented with proteinuria. On stopping TDF, renal function improved. Eight patients had confirmed Fanconi syndrome. Twelve patients presented with bone pain and osteomalacia was confirmed on an isotope bone scan in seven of these patients. The findings (in those patients tested) of tubular proteinuria, reduced tubular transport maximum of phosphate (TmP), and glycosuria were all consistent with the proximal tubule being the site of toxicity.
Renal toxicity remains a concern in patients treated with TDF. Clinical presentation may be with renal dysfunction, Fanconi syndrome or osteomalacia. Our investigations suggest proximal tubular toxicity as a common pathogenic mechanism.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
185 Views
  • Source
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Increased risk of defective urinary phosphate reabsorption and osteoporosis has been reported in HIV and chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). Goals of this study were to evaluate the prevalence of renal phosphate wasting and abnormal bone mineral density in CHB patients taking TDF compared to CHB patients treated with entecavir (ETV) and untreated CHB patients. This is a cross-sectional study of 146 consecutive Asian-American CHB patients who were treatment na < ve (n = 60) or treated with either TDF (n = 42) or ETV (n = 44). Proximal tubular handling of phosphate was assessed by the maximal rate of tubular reabsorption of phosphate (TmPO4) divided by glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (TmPO(4/)GFR). Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured using dual X-ray absorptiometry. TmPO(4/)GFR was similar among CHB patients treated with TDF compared to untreated patients and patients taking ETV. However, among patients treated with a parts per thousand yen18 months of TDF or ETV, prevalence of abnormal TmPO(4/)GFR was higher among patients treated with TDF compared to ETV (48.5 % (16/33) vs. 12.5 % (3/24), p = 0.005). Overall prevalence of osteoporosis in this cohort of CHB patients was 14 %, with no significant difference between the three groups. Renal phosphate handling did not correlate with osteoporosis. Chronic hepatitis B patients treated with a parts per thousand yen18 months of TDF experienced an increased risk of proximal tubular dysfunction. TDF did not increase the risk of osteoporosis. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these findings.
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences 09/2014; 60(2). DOI:10.1007/s10620-014-3363-4 · 2.26 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: R SpecialIssue ecently, a report suggested that the epidemic of human immune deficiency virus (HIV) infection may have reached its peak. Although the number of new cases is reducing, the number of people living with HIV has not decreased as the patients survive in this era in which effective antiretroviral therapy has been widely accessible. The knowledge about HIV disease has never been this immense. The challenges facing us have changed from treating the dying diseased cases complicated with opportunistic infections to dealing with the problems related to long-term treatment including life-long adhe-rence, drug adverse effects, drug resistance, and the need for a newer generation with less toxic drugs. In children, additional challenges are related to adolescent problems. This review summarizes the challenging issues of this era in treating HIV-infected children. The overview disease burden In 2009, there were 33.3 million people living with HIV worldwide, of which 5-10% were children. 1 The majority of them are living in Sub-Saharan Africa. In Thailand, an estimated 400,000 infected people with HIV were reported in 2009, of which approximately 15,000-20,000 were children. Nearly all of them were acquired perinatally. The prevalence of HIV infection among pregnant women in Thailand has declined from 1.74% in 1999 to 0.64% in 2009. After the implementation of a nation-wide prevention-of-mother-to-child-transmission (PMTCT) program, the rate of perinatal transmission has decreased from 25% to 2-4%. 2 Diagnosis of HIV infection in perinatally HIV-exposed infants Virologic assay, either HIV DNA-PCR or RNA-PCR assay, can be used for diagnosis of HIV infection in infants. Because of the maternally transferred anti-HIV antibody, the serologic test causes a false positive in uninfected young infants. The PCR is recommended to be performed at least 2 times at age 1-2 months and 4-6 months. At age 12-18 months of age, the HIV antibody test should always be performed to confirm the diagnosis regardless of the results of prior virologic tests. HIV infection can be definitely diagnosed by the presence of HIV antibody in children aged ≥ 18 months. Definitive exclusion of HIV infection can be made by no clinical or virologic evidence of HIV infection plus one of the fol-lowing criteria: 1) at least two negative HIV PCR assays which are performed at age ≥ 1 month and ≥ 4 months, 2) at least two negative HIV antibody tests at ≥ 6 months of age, 3) one negative HIV PCR at age ≥ 4 months and absence of HIV antibody after 6 months of age. 3 Management of HIV-infected children: the current Thai guidelines HIV-infected children require routine care and an-ticipatory guidance similar to normal children. All HIV-infected children should be immunized with the same schedule as uninfected children except that children with severe immune suppression (CD4 percentage < 15% or CD4 count < 200 cells/mm 3) or severely symptomatic disease status should not receive live-attenuated vaccine such as mumps-measles-rubella or varicella vaccine. Moreover, all HIV-exposed infants with unknown infection status from 4-6 weeks of age, should receive chemoprophylaxis against Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PCP) until HIV infection can be excluded. Cotrimoxazole is the drug of choice. Likewise, infected children younger than 12 months or those with CD4 < 15%; or < 200 cells/mm 3 in children older than 5 years, should also receive PCP prophylaxis. This is because the risk of PCP development is quite high in HIV-infected infants < 12 months regardless of their CD4 levels. Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has been the principle of treatment of HIV infection. HAART normalizes immunologic function, prevents opportunistic infection and mortality. With HAART, HIV has been changed from a deadly disease to a chronic disease in which patients can live a very normal life. HAART is generally composed of three drugs from at least two classes. The aims of antiretroviral therapy are to minimize viral load, maintain viral suppression, preserve immune function, maintain normal growth and development, and improve the quality of life.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
5 Downloads
Available from
Jan 4, 2015