Predictors of parental interest in continuous glucose monitoring for children with type 1 diabetes.

Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, University of Virginia Children's Hospital, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Diabetes Technology &amp Therapeutics (Impact Factor: 2.29). 07/2009; 11(6):373-8. DOI: 10.1089/dia.2008.0100
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Optimal control of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in children minimizes long-term complications, but increases hypoglycemic events. A continuous glucose monitor (CGM) can provide real-time information about glucose levels and trends. Little has been published on the characteristics of patients most willing to use CGM.
Online survey software was utilized to administer a 50-item questionnaire to parents of children with T1D. The primary outcome was whether the parent expressed a high level of interest in CGM. The proportion of parents who expressed a high level of interest was compared across demographic and clinical variables via chi(2) tests (alpha = 0.05).
Analysis was performed on 457 surveys. The mean +/- SD age of the children was 10 +/- 4.1 years. Mean reported hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was 7.8 +/- 1.3%. Of the respondents, 70% used continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). Parents reported an average of eight blood glucose (BG) checks daily. Over 90% of the parents indicated a high level of interest in having their child use a CGM. Primary variables related to interest in a CGM were use of CSII (P = 0.002), checking BG more than six times daily (P = 0.005), and parental worry about high or low BG (P = 0.0012 and P = 0.02, respectively). Age of the child and HbA1c were not related to parental interest in a CGM.
Overall parental interest in CGM was high. Use of CSII, frequent BG checks, and parental worry, but not age of the child or diabetes control, were associated with parental interest in using a CGM.

Download full-text


Available from: Matthew Gurka, Jun 19, 2015
  • Pediatric Diabetes 01/2012; 13(3):215-28. DOI:10.1111/j.1399-5448.2011.00849.x · 2.13 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: IMPORTANCE: Surveillance systems for elucidating the burden of hypoglycemia are limited. OBJECTIVE: To quantify experiences of hypoglycemia and related harms, members of an international online diabetes social network with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus were polled through a software application ("app"). Aggregate results were returned to participants through network channels. DESIGN: The study period was from March 2011 through April 2012, during which time retrospective reports about experiences with hypoglycemia and related harms were collected from participants using the app. SETTING: The study was undertaken within the international online diabetes social network. PARTICIPANTS: Eligibility criteria included TuDiabetes membership, age 13 years or older, a self-reported diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, ability to read and write English, and Internet access. Of 2827 app users, 687 (response rate, 24.3%) opted in to the volunteer sample. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes included the following: frequency of "going low" (having a low glucose value in the past 2 weeks) and episodes of severe hypoglycemia (in the past 12 months), and, for respondents reporting recent and/or severe hypoglycemia, lifetime experience of vehicle crashes or severe medical injury, daily debilitating worry, and withdrawal from driving, exercise, sex, and going outside of the home to avoid hypoglycemia and consequences. Secondary outcomes included measures of research engagement. RESULTS: Of 613 respondents (24.3% of app users), 49.1% reported more than 4 episodes of "going low" in the past 2 weeks and 29.2% reported 1 or more severe low in the past year; 16.6% reported both more than 4 recent low episodes and 1 or more severe event in the past year. Harms were common, including daily debilitating worry (45.8%), vehicle crash or injury (15.0%), and withdrawal from exercise, driving, leaving home, and having sex (54.0%, 37.4%, 24.8%, and 22.7%, respectively). Of all respondents, 54.2% reported multiple harms, the risks for which were highest (73.7%) among respondents with a past-year severe event (odds ratio, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.60-3.58; P < .001 controlling for frequent recent low episodes and demographic and disease factors). Engagement was high, with 96.6% of the sample permitting recontact for research and 31.7% posting personal study data on their app profile page; 40.5% of 2825 unique page views of research-related materials published on the community site involved views of returned research results. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Participatory surveillance of hypoglycemia in an online diabetes social network enables characterization of patient-centered harms in a community sample and bidirectional communication with affected persons, augmenting traditional surveillance.
    JAMA Internal Medicine 02/2013; 173(5):345-51. DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.2512 · 13.25 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To examine the impact of continuous glucose monitoring on diabetes management and marital relationships of adults with Type 1 diabetes and their spouses. Nine younger (30-49 years) and 11 older (50-70 years) patients with Type 1 diabetes and 14 spouses participated in eight focus groups specific to age and role (patient or spouse). Audio-recorded data were transcribed, coded and analysed using thematic analysis and aided by NVivo software. Qualitative analysis revealed participants perceived continuous glucose monitoring as positively influencing hypoglycaemia management by decreasing spouses' anxiety, vigilance and negative experiences. Participants also described continuous glucose monitoring as promoting collaborative diabetes management and increasing spousal understanding of diabetes, especially when planning and managing pregnancy. Couples' conflicts occurred when (1) patients assumed sole responsibility for continuous glucose monitoring and/or did not respond to night-time glucose alarms and (2) spouses did not understand alarms and felt frustrated and helpless to assist patients. Our findings suggest that continuous glucose monitoring may positively impact collaborative diabetes management and marital relationships of patients with Type 1 diabetes and spouses. However, reluctance to collaborate and lack of understanding may contribute to couples' conflicts around continuous glucose monitoring. Our findings have important implications for clinical care and point to the need for interventions that include spouses in continuous glucose monitoring training to increase their understanding of continuous glucose monitoring, minimize risk for spousal conflict and enhance collaborative diabetes management. Further studies are needed to explore these issues in more detail and depth with larger and more diverse populations. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Diabetic Medicine 07/2013; DOI:10.1111/dme.12276 · 3.06 Impact Factor