Article

Effects of Manure and Water Applications on 1,3-Dichloropropene and Chloropicrin Emissions in a Field Trial

United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Water Management Research Unit, San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center, Parlier, California 93648, USA.
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (Impact Factor: 3.11). 06/2009; 57(12):5428-34. DOI: 10.1021/jf900245f
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Minimizing fumigant emissions is required for meeting air-quality standards. Application of organic materials to surface soil has been effective in reducing fumigant emissions during laboratory tests, but the potential to reduce emissions in the field has not been adequately evaluated. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of incorporated composted manure with or without water applications on fumigant emissions and the potential impact on pest control efficacy under field conditions. Treatments included a bare-soil control, composted dairy manure at 12.4 and 24.7 Mg ha(-1), postfumigation intermittent water seals (11 mm water irrigated immediately following fumigation and 4 mm at 12, 24, and 48 h), and incorporation of manure at 12.4 Mg ha(-1) combined with the water seals or a high-density polyethylene (HDPE) tarp. Telone C35 was shank-applied at 553 kg ha(-1), and emissions of 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) and chloropicrin (CP) were monitored for 10 days. The results indicate that there was no significant difference in emission peak flux and cumulative emission loss between the control and the 12.4 Mg ha(-1) manure treatment. The higher manure rate (24.7 Mg ha(-1)) resulted in lower emission flux and cumulative emission loss than 12.4 Mg ha(-1), although the differences were only significant for CP. In contrast, the water treatments with or without manure incorporation significantly reduced peak emission rates (80% reduction) and cumulative emission loss ( approximately 50% reduction). The manure + HDPE treatment resulted in the lowest CP emissions but slightly higher 1,3-D emissions than the water treatments. Reductions in peak emission from water treatments can be important in reducing the potential acute exposure risks to workers and bystanders. This research demonstrated that incorporation of composted manure alone did not reduce fumigant emissions and effective emission reduction with manure amendment may require higher application rates and/or more effective materials than those used in this study.

Full-text

Available from: Suduan Gao, May 29, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
179 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fumigation is a common practice to control soil pathogens, but little is known about the impacts of fumigation on other soil biota groups. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of fumigation on soil biota, including microorganisms, nematodes, and microarthropods. Bacteria were the most resistant group and some survived following treatment with 2000 mg kg−1 dazomet. Some soil fungi survived 100 mg kg−1 dazomet, although they were mainly Trichoderma. The fungi pathogenic to ginseng were all killed at 100 mg kg−1, and showed both inter- and intra-species variation with respect to dazomet susceptibility. Among the nematodes, Aphelenchus was relatively resistant. The results suggested that susceptibility of soil organisms to dazomet differs between species, and that tolerant organisms may engage in recolonisation. In microcosm experiments, the microbial biomass and community were assessed using phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis while recolonisation of soil organisms was controlled by mesh size. The bacterial PLFA levels were changed little after fumigation, whereas the fungal PLFA levels gradually increased after fumigation. Principal analysis of the PLFA levels and the ratio of gram-negative to gram-positive bacteria showed that fumigation altered the microbial community. The number of nematodes did not recover even at 12 weeks after fumigation. The increased Collembolan numbers suggest that fumigated soil could be recolonized by specific organisms that have adapted to the conditions. In field experiments, we tested the ability of organic materials to enhance the recolonisation of fumigated soil by soil organisms. Bean powder and rice bran increased the microbial PLFA levels and nematode numbers at 6 weeks and 12 weeks after treatment, and the abundance of nematodes continued to increase 42 weeks after fumigation. The abundance of microarthropods was only slightly affected by the presence of the organic materials. We suggest that treating fumigated soils with organic materials is an effective technique to promote soil organism numbers. In addition, Trichoderma was observed to be relatively resistant to fumigation, and therefore, we propose that the fumigation effect can be improved by using a combination of resistant Trichoderma and dazomet.
    Pedobiologia 05/2014; 57(3). DOI:10.1016/j.pedobi.2014.01.008 · 1.67 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The phase-out of methyl bromide for preplant soil fumigation has resulted in an increased reliance on combinations of 1,3-dichloropropene and chloropicrin in many annual and perennial cropping systems in California. However, these fumigants also can have negative environmental and human health consequences and considerable research has been conducted on methods to minimize emission of these products from the soil to the atmosphere. To ensure that pest control efficacy is not compromised by emission reduction techniques, this research was conducted to simultaneously evaluate the effects of several surface seal techniques on fumigant emissions and the efficacy of soil-borne pest control with a mixture of 1,3-dichloropropene + chloropicrin. Results indicated that the interaction between emission reduction techniques and pest control efficacy can be complicated. For example in the 2006 trial, some surviving nematodes were observed in plots with both high (manure plus high density polyethylene film) and intermediate (pre-irrigation) 1,3-D cumulative emissions which suggested that emission loses are not solely responsible for some pest control failures. Weed control tended to be better with plastic film treatments and worse with pre-fumigation soil moisture manipulations but was affected less than expected by intermittent water seals. Although pest control clearly was affected by surface seal techniques, especially in shallow soil layers, some differences in nematode and weed control could not be explained solely by surface seals. These results underline the complex interactions among soil moisture and other environmental factors, application techniques, and emission reducing surface seal treatments. As new techniques and technologies become available to reduce fumigant emissions, we recommend that research include pest control efficacy evaluations before any emerging techniques are required by regulators or implemented by growers.
    Crop Protection 02/2011; 30(2):203–207. DOI:10.1016/j.cropro.2010.10.011 · 1.54 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A gelatin capsule (gel cap) formulation of the mixture of 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) and chloropicrin (CP) has been developed to reduce environmental emissions and potential human exposure from the use of 1,3-D/CP as a soil fumigant. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the biological efficacy of 1,3-D/CP gel cap formulations under greenhouse trial conditions. The current results indicate that a 1,3-D/CP gel cap formulation at 30 or 50 g a.i. m−2 can reduce the soil populations of Fusarium spp., Phytophthora spp., Pythium spp. and Meloidogyne spp.. In all tested crops, the 1,3-D/CP gel cap formulation provided marketable yields that were significantly higher than untreated controls and equal to the methyl bromide and 1,3-D/CP liquid injection treatments. Yields of tomato and a subsequent melon crop in plots treated with 1,3-D/CP gel cap were 93% and 87% greater, respectively, than the control. The yields of grafted cucumber and the subsequent balsam pear crop were increased by 16% and 201% respectively, compared to the control. The present study confirms that the tested 1,3-D/CP gel cap formulation provides a promising method for soil pest and disease control and reducing environmental emissions and potential human exposure in greenhouse vegetable cultivation.
    Crop Protection 06/2013; 48:24–28. DOI:10.1016/j.cropro.2013.02.002 · 1.54 Impact Factor