Epigenomic profiling indicates a role for DNA methylation in early postnatal liver development.

Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, USDA Children's Nutrition Research Center, 1100 Bates St., Ste. 5080, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Human Molecular Genetics (Impact Factor: 6.68). 06/2009; 18(16):3026-38. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddp241
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The question of whether DNA methylation contributes to the stabilization of gene expression patterns in differentiated mammalian tissues remains controversial. Using genome-wide methylation profiling, we screened 3757 gene promoters for changes in methylation during postnatal liver development to test the hypothesis that developmental changes in methylation and expression are temporally correlated. We identified 31 genes that gained methylation and 111 that lost methylation from embryonic day 17.5 to postnatal day 21. Promoters undergoing methylation changes in postnatal liver tended not to be associated with CpG islands. At most genes studied, developmental changes in promoter methylation were associated with expression changes, suggesting both that transcriptional inactivity attracts de novo methylation, and that transcriptional activity can override DNA methylation and successively induce developmental hypomethylation. These in vivo data clearly indicate a role for DNA methylation in mammalian differentiation, and provide the novel insight that critical windows in mammalian developmental epigenetics extend well beyond early embryonic development.


Available from: Richard Kellermayer, May 06, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Our many current environmental challenges, including worldwide abnormal weather, global warming, and pollution, necessitate a new and innovative strategy for animal production for the next generation. This strategy should incorporate not only higher-efficiency production, but also advanced biological concepts and multi-functional agricultural techniques, into environmentally friendly systems. Recent research has discovered a unique phenomenon referred to as 'foetal and neonatal programming', which is based on 'the developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD)' concept. These studies have shown that alterations in foetal and early postnatal nutrition and endocrine status may result in developmental adaptations that permanently change the structure, physiology and metabolism of affected animals during adult life. Ruminants fill an important ecological niche that capitalises on the symbiotic relationship between fibre-fermenting ruminal microbes and the mammalian demand for usable nutrients. The timing of the perturbation in maternal nutrient availability plays an important role in determining the effect that the foetal and neonatal programming will have on the developing placenta or foetus and offspring performance. Developmental programming through nutritional manipulations may help the ruminant, as an effective grass-protein converter, fulfil its production potential.
    Animal Production Science 01/2015; 55(2):145. DOI:10.1071/AN14467 · 1.03 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study aimed to investigate the effects of maternal vitamin D restriction on carbohydrate metabolism and alterations in the pancreas and liver in the F1 and F2 generations. Therefore, we studied the first two generations of offspring (F1 and F2) of Swiss mice from mothers fed one of two diets: SC (standard chow) or VitD(-) (vitamin D-deficient). Biometric, biochemical and molecular analyses were performed. The VitD-F1 mice had greater body mass (BM) than the SC-F1 mice. The BM changes were accompanied by increased insulin secretion. The VitD-F1 mice had a higher area under the curve in the oral glucose tolerance test and exhibited larger islet diameters than the SC-F1 mice. In addition, the VitD-F1 mice showed marked diffuse hepatic steatosis and higher expression of fatty acid synthase (FAS) protein than the SC animals in either generation or the ViD-F2 mice. Diet accounted for a greater fraction of the total variation for BM, fat pad mass and insulin secretion than generation. Both diet and generation contributed to the variation in steatosis in the liver, islet diameter and expression of FAS. However, interactions between diet and generation were observed only for insulin secretion, steatosis in the liver and FAS expression. In conclusion, these results provide compelling evidence that maternal vitamin D restriction affects the development of the offspring and leads to metabolic alterations accompanied by structural alterations in the liver and pancreas, especially in the F1 generation.
    Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology 01/2013; 59(5):367-74. DOI:10.3177/jnsv.59.367 · 0.87 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Normal placentation relies on an efficient maternal adaptation to pregnancy. Within the decidua, natural killer (NK) cells and dendritic cells (DC) have a critical role in modulating angiogenesis and decidualization associated with pregnancy. However, the contribution of these immune cells to the placentation process and subsequently fetal development remains largely elusive. Using two different mouse models, we here show that optimal placentation and fetal development is sensitive to disturbances in NK cell relative abundance at the fetal-maternal interface. Depletion of NK cells during early gestation compromises the placentation process by causing alteration in placental function and structure. Embryos derived from NK-depleted dams suffer from intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), a phenomenon that continued to be evident in the offspring on post-natal day 4. Further, we demonstrate that IUGR was accompanied by an overall reduction of global DNA methylation levels and epigenetic changes in the methylation of specific hepatic gene promoters. Thus, temporary changes within the NK cell pool during early gestation influence placental development and function, subsequently affecting hepatic gene methylation and fetal metabolism.
    Cell Death & Disease 08/2014; 5:e1392. DOI:10.1038/cddis.2014.353 · 5.18 Impact Factor