Twenty-year outcome for individuals with autism and average or near-average cognitive abilities. Autism Research, 2(2), 109-118

Utah Autism Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, 650 Komas Dr., Ste. 206, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.
Autism Research (Impact Factor: 4.33). 04/2009; 2(2):109-18. DOI: 10.1002/aur.69
Source: PubMed


Previous studies found substantial variability in adult outcome for people with autism whose cognitive functioning was within the near-average and average ranges. This study examined adult outcome for 41 such individuals (38 men and 3 women) originally identified through an epidemiological survey of autism in Utah. Mean age at the time of their previous cognitive assessment was 7.2 years (SD=4.1, range=3.1-25.9 years) and at follow-up was 32.5 years (SD=5.7 years, range=22.3-46.4 years). Outcome measures included standardized assessments of diagnostic status, cognitive ability, and adaptive behavior. Additional information collected concerned demographic variables, indicators of independence, social relationships, medical and psychiatric conditions, and social service use. Outcomes for this sample were better than outcomes described in previous work on individuals with similar cognitive functioning. For example, half of the participants were rated as "Very Good" or "Good" on a global outcome measure. As in previous studies, there was considerable variability in measured cognitive ability over time. Over half of the sample had large gains or losses of cognitive ability of greater than 1 standard deviation. Cognitive gain was associated with better outcome, as was better adaptive functioning. While all participants had baseline IQs in the nonimpaired range, there was limited evidence to support the use of other early childhood variables to predict adult outcome.

Download full-text


Available from: William R Jenson,
  • Source
    • "Significant numbers of people with early diagnoses of ASD make better progress than was originally predicted. The differences in progress cannot be attributed to specific interventions (Farley et al. 2009; Fountain, Winter & Bearman 2012). "
    [Show description] [Hide description]
    DESCRIPTION: Draft MS (part 3) discussing UK ASD research and implications of DSM5, RDoC and the IACC
  • Source
    • "Core difficulties of ASD generally persist into adulthood (Seltzer et al. 2003; Shattuck et al. 2007; Taylor and Seltzer 2010), and the majority of individuals with ASD will require varying levels of life-long supports (Hus and Lord 2014). Even for those without ID, ASD often has negative impacts on learning and independence in adulthood (Farley et al. 2009; Howlin 2013; Pugliese et al. 2015). Thus, it is important to understand ASD symptoms in adults with ASD without ID in order for accurate diagnosis and subsequent supports to promote positive outcomes (Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee 2011). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent updates have been proposed to the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2 Module 4 diagnostic algorithm. This new algorithm, however, has not yet been validated in an independent sample without intellectual disability (ID). This multi-site study compared the original and revised algorithms in individuals with ASD without ID. The revised algorithm demonstrated increased sensitivity, but lower specificity in the overall sample. Estimates were highest for females, individuals with a verbal IQ below 85 or above 115, and ages 16 and older. Best practice diagnostic procedures should include the Module 4 in conjunction with other assessment tools. Balancing needs for sensitivity and specificity depending on the purpose of assessment (e.g., clinical vs. research) and demographic characteristics mentioned above will enhance its utility.
    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 09/2015; DOI:10.1007/s10803-015-2586-3 · 3.06 Impact Factor
    • "Similar to the science majors in that study, professionals working with individuals with ASD should help them fi nd an educational or vocational environment where their interests and talents are accepted and respected. Additionally, it is necessary that comorbid learning diffi culties and health problems (mental or physical) are identifi ed and supported, given that these diffi culties further compromise an individual's functioning in educational and vocational settings (Farley et al., 2009 ). Examples of supports and strategies that may be provided are found in Table 1 . "

    Neuropsychology of Men: A Developmental Perspective from Theory to Evidence-based Practice, Edited by Charles M. Zaroff, Rik Carl D'Amato, 09/2015: pages 63-84; Springer.
Show more