Article

Test performance of endobronchial ultrasound and transbronchial needle aspiration biopsy for mediastinal staging in patients with lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

Academic Division of Thoracic Surgery, Imperial College, Royal Brompton Hospital, London SW3 6NP, UK.
Thorax (Impact Factor: 8.56). 06/2009; 64(9):757-62. DOI: 10.1136/thx.2008.109868
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) with transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) is becoming widely used for mediastinal lymph node staging in patients with known or suspected lung cancer. While a substantial number of case series have evaluated test performance of this investigation, the small sample sizes limited the ability to accurately evaluate the precision of EBUS-TBNA as a staging modality. A systematic review was performed of published studies evaluating EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal lymph node staging to ascertain the pooled sensitivity and specificity of this investigation.
A literature search was constructed and performed by a professional medical librarian to identify the literature from 1960 to February 2008. Pooled specificity and sensitivity was estimated from the extracted data with an exact binomial rendition of the bivariate mixed-effects regression model.
Of 365 publications, 25 were identified in which EBUS-TBNA was specifically focused on mediastinal node staging. Of these, only 10 had data suitable for extraction and analysis. The overall test performance was excellent with an area under the summary receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.99 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.00); similarly, EBUS-TBNA had excellent pooled specificity of 1.00 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.00) and good pooled sensitivity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.94).
EBUS-TBNA has excellent overall test performance and specificity for mediastinal lymph node staging in patients with lung cancer. The results compare favourably with published results for computed tomography and positron emission tomography.

1 Follower
 · 
74 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Accurate preoperative staging and restaging of mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with potentially resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is of paramount importance. In 2007, the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) published an algorithm on preoperative mediastinal staging integrating imaging, endoscopic and surgical techniques. Over the last years more evidence of the different mediastinal staging technique has become available. Therefore, a revision of the ESTS guidelines was needed. In case of CT-enlarged or PET-positive mediastinal lymph nodes, tissue confirmation is indicated. Endosonography (EBUS/EUS) with fine needle aspiration is the first choice (when available) since it is minimally invasive and has a high sensitivity to rule in mediastinal nodal disease. If negative, surgical staging with nodal dissection or biopsy is indicated. Video-assisted mediastinoscopy is preferred over mediastinoscopy. The combined use of endoscopic staging and surgical staging results in the highest accuracy. When there are no enlarged lymph nodes on CT and when there is no uptake in lymph nodes on PET or PET-CT, direct surgical resection with systematic nodal dissection is indicated for tumors ≤3 cm located in the outer third of the lung. In central tumors or N1 nodes, preoperative mediastinal staging is indicated. The choice between endoscopic staging with EBUS/EUS and fine needle aspiration or video-assisted mediastinoscopy depends on local expertise to adhere to minimal requirements for staging. For tumors larger than 3 cm, preoperative mediastinal staging is advised, mainly in adenocarcinoma with high SUV uptake.
    08/2014; 3(4):225-33. DOI:10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2014.08.05
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 04/2015; 191(7):727-8. DOI:10.1164/rccm.201502-0291ED · 11.99 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Correct mediastinal staging is critical for determination of the most appropriate management strategy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) with that of mediastinoscopy in patients with NSCLC. A prospective trial was conducted in a tertiary referral center in Korea. Patients with histologically proven NSCLC and suspicion for N1, N2, or N3 metastasis were enrolled. Each patient underwent EBUS-TBNA followed by mediastinoscopy. Surgical resection and complete lymph node dissection were conducted in patients for whom no evidence of mediastinal metastasis was apparent after mediastinoscopy. In total, 138 patients underwent EBUS-TBNA and 127 completed both EBUS-TBNA and mediastinoscopy. N2/N3 disease was confirmed in 59.1% of the patients. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) of EBUS-TBNA on a per-person analysis were 88.0%, 100%, 92.9%, 100%, and 85.2%, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and NPV of mediastinoscopy on a per-person analysis were 81.3%, 100%, 89.0%, 100%, and 78.8%, respectively. Significant differences in the sensitivity, accuracy, and NPV were evident between EBUS-TBNA and mediastinoscopy (p < 0.005). EBUS-TBNA was superior to mediastinoscopy in terms of its diagnostic performance for mediastinal staging of cN1-3 NSCLC. Because EBUS-TBNA is both less invasive and affords superior diagnostic sensitivity, it should be the first-line procedure performed in patients with NSCLC.
    Journal of thoracic oncology: official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer 02/2015; 10(2):331-7. DOI:10.1097/JTO.0000000000000388 · 5.80 Impact Factor