Metabolomic analysis reveals a common pattern of metabolic re-programming during invasion of three host plant species by Magnaporthe grisea

Institute of Biological Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Penglais Campus, Aberystwyth, UK.
The Plant Journal (Impact Factor: 5.97). 06/2009; 59(5):723-37. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03912.x
Source: PubMed


The mechanisms by which biotrophic and hemi-biotrophic fungal pathogens simultaneously subdue plant defences and sequester host nutrients are poorly understood. Using metabolite fingerprinting, we show that Magnaporthe grisea, the causal agent of rice blast disease, dynamically re-programmes host metabolism during plant colonization. Identical patterns of metabolic change occurred during M. grisea infections in barley, rice and Brachypodium distachyon. Targeted metabolite profiling by GC-MS confirmed the modulation of a conserved set of metabolites. In pre-symptomatic tissues, malate and polyamines accumulated, rather than being utilized to generate defensive reactive oxygen species, and the levels of metabolites associated with amelioration of redox stress in various cellular compartments increased dramatically. The activity of NADP-malic enzyme and generation of reactive oxygen species were localized to pathogen penetration sites, and both appeared to be suppressed in compatible interactions. Early diversion of the shikimate pathway to produce quinate was observed, as well as accumulation of non-polymerized lignin precursors. These data are consistent with modulation of defensive phenylpropanoid metabolism by M. grisea and the inability of susceptible hosts to mount a hypersensitive reaction or produce lignified papillae (both involving reactive oxygen species) to restrict pathogen invasion. Rapid proliferation of M. grisea hyphae in plant tissue after 3 days was associated with accelerated nutrient acquisition and utilization by the pathogen. Conversion of photoassimilate into mannitol and glycerol for carbon sequestration and osmolyte production appear to drive hyphal growth. Taken together, our results suggest that fungal pathogens deploy a common metabolic re-programming strategy in diverse host species to suppress plant defence and colonize plant tissue.

Download full-text


Available from: David P Enot,
    • "Amino acid, carbohydrate, alkaloid, phospholipid, and flavonoid metabolisms showed a significant variation (P [ 0.05) between genotypes, suggesting that these metabolic changes may reflect genotype-dependent and genetic adaption to environmental stimuli due to the plant origin, as in the case of DHA which originated from a tropical environment. Such trends in metabolic accumulation have been reported in stress tolerance in different plants (Parker et al. 2009; Evers et al. 2010; Dauwe et al. 2012). The induction of free amino acids as osmolytes in response to abiotic stress is thought to play a pivotal role in plant stress tolerance through intracellular pH regulation, detoxification of reactive oxygen species (ROS), xenobiotics, UV, and heavy metals (Nuccio et al. 1999; Zagorchev et al. 2013). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Environmental stress conditions such as drought, heat, salinity, or pathogen infection can have a devastating impact on plant growth and yield, resulting in a need for stress-tolerant crop varieties. Crossbreeding tropical and cultivated onion species produced a hybrid F1 generation possessing genetic and metabolic parental properties that aided abiotic stress tolerance. Targeted metabolite profiling using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry integrated with transcriptional analysis of their relevant genes provided insights into the metabolic and genomic architecture of the onion doubled haploid (Allium cepa L., DHC), shallot doubled haploid (A. cepa L. Aggregatum group, DHA), and F1 hybrid. Out of a complete set of 113 targeted metabolites, 49 metabolites were found to be statistically significantly different between genotypes: 11 metabolites were characteristic for DHC, 10 for DHA, 14 for F1, and 14 metabolites were shared among the three genotypes. Several key genes and metabolites introgressed in abiotic stress response were up-regulated in DHA and F1 genotypes as compared to DHC. Principal component analysis and Volcano plot analysis revealed that metabolic traits and their relevant genes (namely, amino acid, carbohydrate, flavonoid, and phospholipid biosynthesis) were strongly linked with DHA and F1, reflecting the adaptability of DHA and F1 toward abiotic stress as compared to DHC.
    Molecular Breeding 10/2015; 35(10). DOI:10.1007/s11032-015-0378-2 · 2.25 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "However, pathogens can interfere with plant system defense by diverting secondary metabolic pathways. In susceptible rice cultivars, Magnaporthe grisea prevents formation of lignin polymers and establishment of the defense phenylpropanoid metabolism by diverting the shikimate pathway, downstream of the phenylpropanoid pathway, to quinate accumulation that can be lethal to plant cells (Parker et al. 2009; Orcaray et al. 2010). Moreover, modifications of phenolic metabolite production were also observed in plants when inoculated with PGPR (Lavania et al. 2006; Walker et al. 2011, 2012; Chamam et al. 2013). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Main conclusion: Profiling of plant secondary metabolite allows to differentiate the different types of ecological interactions established between rice and bacteria. Rice responds to ecologically distinct bacteria by altering its content of flavonoids and hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives. Plants' growth and physiology are strongly influenced by the biotic interactions that plants establish with soil bacterial populations. Plants are able to sense and to respond accordingly to ecologically distinct bacteria, by inducing defense pathways against pathogens to prevent parasitic interactions, and by stimulating the growth of root-associated beneficial or commensal bacteria through root exudation. Plant secondary metabolism is expected to play a major role in this control. However, secondary metabolite responses of a same plant to cooperative, commensal and deleterious bacteria have so far never been compared. The impact of the plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) Azospirillum lipoferum 4B on the secondary metabolite profiles of two Oryza sativa L. cultivars (Cigalon and Nipponbare) was compared to that of a rice pathogen Burkholderia glumae AU6208, the causing agent of bacterial panicle blight and of a commensal environmental bacteria Escherichia coli B6. Root and shoot rice extracts were analyzed by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC). Principal component analyses (PCAs) pinpointed discriminant secondary metabolites, which were characterized by mass spectrometry. Direct comparison of metabolic profiles evidenced that each bacterial ecological interaction induced distinct qualitative and quantitative modifications of rice secondary metabolism, by altering the content of numerous flavonoid compounds and hydroxycinnamic acid (HCA) derivatives. Secondary metabolism varied according to the cultivars and the interaction types, demonstrating the relevance of secondary metabolic profiling for studying plant-bacteria biotic interactions.
    Planta 08/2015; 242(6). DOI:10.1007/s00425-015-2382-5 · 3.26 Impact Factor
    • "The introduction of so-called 'metabolomics' has allowed detection of a wide range of low-molecular-weight compounds (Dixon, 2001; Fiehn, 2002; Allwood et al., 2008), thus providing an approach to qualitatively and quantitatively define the metabolite profile of plants challenged by pathogens. However, very few metabolomics studies of plant–pathogen interactions have been reported (Parker et al., 2009), and much of what we know about metabolic intermediates involved in plant responses to pathogens in vegetative tissues comes from studies in Arabidopsis plants (Ward et al., 2010; Lloyd et al., 2011), even though Solanaceous plants, especially tomato, constitute an excellent model system to investigate the interactions between plants and biotic stressors (Arie et al., 2007). In addition, tomato is an important vegetable worldwide, and may be affected by a number of pathogens, including fungi, bacteria , viruses and nematodes. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this study, using untargeted global metabolomic analysis, we have determined and compared the chemical nature of the metabolites altered during the interaction of tomato plants (cv Ailsa Craig) challenged by Botrytis cinerea and Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 (Pst), two pathogens with different invasion mechanisms and lifestyles. We also obtained the metabolome of tomato plants primed by the natural resistance inducer hexanoic acid (Hx) and then infected with these pathogens. By contrasting the metabolomic profiles of infected, primed, and primed and infected plants, we determined not only the processes or components related directly to plant defense responses but also inferred the metabolic mechanisms by which pathogen resistance is primed. The data show that basal and Hx-induced resistance (Hx-IR) to Botrytis and Pst is associated with a marked metabolic reprogramming. This includes significant changes in amino acids (aas), sugars, free fatty acids (FAs) and in the primary and secondary metabolism. The comparison of the metabolic profiles of the interactions led to clear differences and reflected the fact that the chemical responses are highly adapted to specific attackers. The data also point to the involvement in tomato of signaling molecules, including pipecolic (Pip) and azelaic acid (Aza), in response to Pst and, interestingly, to Botrytis. The compound 1-methyltryptophan (1-MT) was identified as being associated with the tomato-Pst and tomato-Botrytis interactions as well as with the Hx-IR. Root application of this Trp-derived metabolite also demonstrated its ability to protect tomato plants against both pathogens. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    The Plant Journal 08/2015; 84(1). DOI:10.1111/tpj.12964 · 5.97 Impact Factor
Show more

Similar Publications