Article

Ten years at the Multisensory Forum: musings on the evolution of a field.

Program in Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, The City College of the City University of New York, 138th St. & Convent Avenue, New York, NY 10031, USA.
Brain Topography (Impact Factor: 3.67). 06/2009; 21(3-4):149-54. DOI: 10.1007/s10548-009-0102-9
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Research on all things multisensory has literally exploded since the inception of the International Multisensory Research Forum (IMRF) conference at Oxford in 1999. Here we find ourselves at the 10th annual meeting, for the second time in New York, with a wealth of data from which we will work to gain insights into the mechanisms by which the brain deals with and benefits from multisensory inputs. We have taken this opportunity for some musings on what the last 10 years have taught us, and where we think the field may be heading in the years to come. Our ramblings will be necessarily biased and incomplete and for this we apologize in advance. We also take the opportunity to highlight some of the clinical translational work that is now being done in the field, and to emphasize the importance and potency of translating findings from the basic research domain to diagnostic and clinical applications.

1 Bookmark
 · 
138 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Here, we examined sensitivity of visual, auditory, and audiovisual temporal order in five age-groups (20 to 70 years old). We also measured multisensory integration (MSI) using a phenomenon known as "temporal ventriloquism," in which click sounds improve sensitivity of visual temporal order. Results showed that sensitivity of visual, auditory, and audiovisual temporal order declined from 50 years on. However, there was no corresponding decline in MSI as the click sounds actually compensated the loss of sensitivity of visual temporal order in the elderly. Sensitivity of audiovisual temporal order did not correlate with MSI, suggesting that well-preserved explicit judgments about cross-modal temporal order are not required for MSI to occur.
    Experimental Brain Research 10/2013; · 2.22 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Under noisy listening conditions, visualizing a speaker's articulations substantially improves speech intelligibility. This multisensory speech integration ability is crucial to effective communication, and the appropriate development of this capacity greatly impacts a child's ability to successfully navigate educational and social settings. Research shows that multisensory integration abilities continue developing late into childhood. The primary aim here was to track the development of these abilities in children with autism, since multisensory deficits are increasingly recognized as a component of the autism spectrum disorder (ASD) phenotype. The abilities of high-functioning ASD children (n = 84) to integrate seen and heard speech were assessed cross-sectionally, while environmental noise levels were systematically manipulated, comparing them with age-matched neurotypical children (n = 142). Severe integration deficits were uncovered in ASD, which were increasingly pronounced as background noise increased. These deficits were evident in school-aged ASD children (5-12 year olds), but were fully ameliorated in ASD children entering adolescence (13-15 year olds). The severity of multisensory deficits uncovered has important implications for educators and clinicians working in ASD. We consider the observation that the multisensory speech system recovers substantially in adolescence as an indication that it is likely amenable to intervention during earlier childhood, with potentially profound implications for the development of social communication abilities in ASD children.
    Cerebral Cortex 08/2013; · 8.31 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mental imagery, or the ability to simulate in the mind information that is not currently perceived by the senses, has attracted considerable research interest in psychology since the early 1970's. Within the past two decades, research in this field-as in cognitive psychology more generally-has been dominated by neuroscientific methods that typically involve comparisons between imagery performance of participants from clinical populations with those who exhibit apparently normal cognitive functioning. Although this approach has been valuable in identifying key neural substrates of visual imagery, it has been less successful in understanding the possible mechanisms underlying another simulation process, namely, motor imagery or the mental rehearsal of actions without engaging in the actual movements involved. In order to address this oversight, a "strength-based" approach has been postulated which is concerned with understanding those on the high ability end of the imagery performance spectrum. Guided by the expert performance approach and principles of ecological validity, converging methods have the potential to enable imagery researchers to investigate the neural "signature" of elite performers, for example. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to explain the origin, nature, and implications of the strength-based approach to mental imagery. Following a brief explanation of the background to this latter approach, we highlight some important theoretical advances yielded by recent research on mental practice, mental travel, and meta-imagery processes in expert athletes and dancers. Next, we consider the methodological implications of using a strength-based approach to investigate imagery processes. The implications for the field of motor cognition are outlined and specific research questions, in dynamic imagery, imagery perspective, measurement, multi-sensory imagery, and metacognition that may benefit from this approach in the future are sketched briefly.
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 01/2013; 7:104. · 2.91 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
38 Downloads
Available from
May 15, 2014