Available from: Guido Di Gregorio, Dec 31, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) has been shown to ameliorate the toxicity of lipid-soluble agents in animal studies and clinical cases. To investigate the therapeutic effects of ILE in a rat model of toxicity from calcium channel blockers (CCBs), including diltiazem and nicardipine. Two sets of experiments of CCB poisoning were conducted. In the first set, 14 male Sprague-Dawley rats were sedated and treated with ILE or normal saline (NS), followed by continuous intravenous infusion of diltiazem (20 mg/kg/h). In the second experiment, the study protocol was the same except the infusion of nicardipine (20 mg/kg/h). The total dose of infused drug and the duration of survival were measured. In addition, mean arterial pressure and heart rate were monitored. Survival was prolonged in the ILE group (48.4 ± 11.3 vs. 25.0 ± 3.7 min; p = 0.002). Furthermore, the cumulative mean lethal dose of diltiazem was higher in the ILE group (16.1 ± 3.8 mg/kg) than in the NS group (8.3 ± 1.1 mg/kg) (p = 0.002). With nicardipine poisoning, survival was also prolonged in the ILE group (71.0 ± 8.3 min vs. 30.6 ± 6.1 min; p = 0.002). The cumulative mean lethal dose was higher in the ILE group than in the NS group (23.7 ± 2.8 mg/kg vs. 10.2 ± 2.0 mg/kg; p = 0.002). ILE pretreatment prolonged survival and increased the lethal dose in a rat model of CCB poisoning using diltiazem and nicardipine.
    Clinical Toxicology 05/2015; DOI:10.3109/15563650.2015.1045979 · 3.12 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The use of intravenous lipid emulsions (ILEs) as antidote in local anaesthetic systemic toxicity has gained widespread support following convincing data from animal models, and successful case reports in humans. Proposed beneficial mechanisms of action for ILEs include intravascular sequestration of intoxicant and subsequent enhanced redistribution to biologically inert tissues, augmentation of fatty acid utilisation for ATP synthesis in the context of metabolic poisoning, and direct cardiotonic and ion channel effects. The evidence base for use of ILEs in acute drug intoxication is evolving. The present evidence supports use of ILEs only in local anaesthetic systemic toxicity and in lipophilic cardiotoxin intoxication when there is an immediate threat to life, and other therapies have proven ineffective.
    Critical care (London, England) 01/2014; 18(5):457. DOI:10.1186/s13054-014-0457-5
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Several molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) were prepared in the present work, and their binding properties were evaluated in comparison with a nonimprinted polymer (NIP). An optimized MIP was selected and applied for selective extraction and analysis of haloperidol in rabbit brain tissue. A molecularly imprinted solid-phase extraction (MISPE) method was developed for cleanup and preconcentration of haloperidol in brain samples before HPLC-UV analysis. Selectivity of the MISPE procedure was investigated using haloperidol and some structurally different drugs with similar polarity that could exist simultaneously in brain tissue. The extraction and analytical process was calibrated in the range of 0.05-10 ppm. The recovery of haloperidol in this MISPE process was calculated between 79.9 and 90.4 %. The limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ) of the assay were 0.008 and 0.05 ppm, respectively. Intraday precision and interday precision values for haloperidol analysis were less than 5.86 and 7.63 %, respectively. The MISPE method could effectively extract and concentrate haloperidol from brain tissue in the presence of clozapine and imipramine. Finally, the imprinted polymer was successfully applied for the determination of haloperidol in a real rabbit brain sample after administration of a toxic dose. Therefore, the proposed MISPE method could be applied in the extraction and preconcentration before HPLC-UV analysis of haloperidol in rabbit brain tissue.
    Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 09/2014; DOI:10.1007/s00216-014-8178-9 · 3.58 Impact Factor