Modulation of spontaneous breathing via limbic/paralimbic–bulbar circuitry: An event-related fMRI study

Department of Psychiatry, Division of Neurotherapeutics, Massachusetts General Hospital-East, 13th Street, Building 149, Suite 2625, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
NeuroImage (Impact Factor: 6.36). 06/2009; 47(3):961-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.025
Source: PubMed


It is well established that pacemaker neurons in the brainstem provide automatic control of breathing for metabolic homeostasis and survival. During waking spontaneous breathing, cognitive and emotional demands can modulate the intrinsic brainstem respiratory rhythm. However the neural circuitry mediating this modulation is unknown. Studies of supra-pontine influences on the control of breathing have implicated limbic/paralimbic-bulbar circuitry, but these studies have been limited to either invasive surgical electrophysiological methods or neuroimaging during substantial respiratory provocation. Here we probed the limbic/paralimbic-bulbar circuitry for respiratory-related neural activity during unlabored spontaneous breathing at rest as well as during a challenging cognitive task (sustained random number generation). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with simultaneous physiological monitoring (heart rate, respiratory rate, tidal volume, end-tidal CO(2)) was acquired in 14 healthy subjects during each condition. The cognitive task produced expected increases in breathing rate, while end-tidal CO(2) and heart rate did not significantly differ between conditions. The respiratory cycle served as the input function for breath-by-breath, event-related, voxel-wise, random-effects image analyses in SPM5. Main effects analyses (cognitive task+rest) demonstrated the first evidence of coordinated neural activity associated with spontaneous breathing within the medulla, pons, midbrain, amygdala, anterior cingulate and anterior insular cortices. Between-condition paired t-tests (cognitive task>rest) demonstrated modulation within this network localized to the dorsal anterior cingulate and pontine raphe magnus nucleus. We propose that the identified limbic/paralimbic-bulbar circuitry plays a significant role in cognitive and emotional modulation of spontaneous breathing.

Download full-text


Available from: Darin D Dougherty,
55 Reads
  • Source
    • "Distinctly different from autonomic breathing, voluntary breathing requires extensive cortical and subcortical activation and suppression of brainstem respiratory center for autonomic breathing [33], [34]. According to brain imaging studies, these respiratory-related areas include the primary motor cortex, the premotor cortex, the supplementary motor area, the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices, the insula, the ACC and amygdala, and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [35]–[46]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective Painful peripheral electrical stimulation to acupuncture points was found to cause sensitization if delivered randomly (EStim), but induced habituation if triggered by voluntary breathing (BreEStim). The objective was to systematically compare the effectiveness of BreEStim and EStim and to investigate the possible mechanisms mediating the habituation effect of BreEStim. Methods Eleven pain-free, healthy subjects (6 males, 5 females) participated in the study. Each subject received the BreEStim and EStim treatments in a random order at least three days apart. Both treatments consisted of 120 painful but tolerable stimuli to the ulnar nerve at the elbow on the dominant arm. BreEStim was triggered by voluntary breathing while EStim was delivered randomly. Electrical sensation threshold (EST) and electrical pain threshold (EPT) were measured from the thenar and hypothenar eminences on both hands at pre-intervention and 10-minutes post-intervention. Results There was no difference in the pre-intervention baseline measurement of EST and EPT between BreEStim and EStim. BreEStim increased EPT in all tested sites on both hands, while EStim increased EPT in the dominant hypothenar eminence distal to the stimulating site and had no effect on EPT in other sites. There was no difference in the intensity of electrical stimulation between EStim and BreEStim. Conclusion Our findings support the important role human voluntary breathing plays in the systemic habituation effect of BreEStim to peripheral painful electrical stimulation.
    PLoS ONE 08/2014; 9(8):e104729. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0104729 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "However, there is no relationship between cardiorespiratory coupling and baroreflex sensitivity or blood pressure variability (Tzeng et al., 2003). Further, shared neural networks for respiratory and HR oscillations (Evans et al., 2009) suggest that the manipulation on breathing may also lead to unintended effects on HRV by removing some of the variance in HRV that may relevantly covary with experimental task. Intriguingly, the degree of coupling may be higher when HRV is increased and at lower breathing frequencies (Galletly and Larsen, 2001; Tzeng et al., 2003), suggesting that unhealthy populations or experiments that are designed to reduce HRV may be more prone to decoupling of cardiorespiratory oscillations . "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Heart rate variability (HRV) refers to various methods of assessing the beat-to-beat variation in the heart over time, in order to draw inference on the outflow of the autonomic nervous system. Easy access to measuring HRV has led to a plethora of studies within emotion science and psychology assessing autonomic regulation, but significant caveats exist due to the complicated nature of HRV. Firstly, both breathing and blood pressure regulation have their own relationship to social, emotional, and cognitive experiments – if this is the case are we observing heart rate (HR) changes as a consequence of breathing changes? Secondly, experiments often have poor internal and external controls. In this review we highlight the interrelationships between HR and respiration, as well as presenting recommendations for researchers to use when collecting data for HRV assessment. Namely, we highlight the superior utility of within-subjects designs along with the importance of establishing an appropriate baseline and monitoring respiration.
    Frontiers in Psychology 07/2014; 5(805). DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00805 · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Magnetic resonance imaging studies have shown that respiration consistently affects brain activity [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]. It can thus be assumed that communication in humans is prone to the recipient's breathing phase; i.e. the relative position in their breathing cycle. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this research, we observe volunteer's ability to recall visual stimuli in relation to their breathing phase at the time of presentation of those stimuli. To assess the ability to recall visual stimuli, we have exposed volunteers to a short term cued visual recall task; a cued Brown–Peterson task. We observe that the ability to recall visual stimuli does not noticeably relate to inspiration/expiration phasing (4.2% bias), but that it more noticeably relates to volume of air in lungs measured as expansion of abdomen (10.2% bias). We propose that this observation could potentially suggest that humans are more susceptible to memorizing new stimuli when there is less air in their lungs; i.e. after they have sufficiently exhaled by sighing, yawning, or vocally expressing what's on their mind. As soon as new inhalation occurs, another fight or flight response is initiated, and their susceptibility to new information is reduced.
    Neurology Psychiatry and Brain Research 12/2013; 19(4). DOI:10.1016/j.npbr.2013.07.001 · 0.10 Impact Factor
Show more