Article

Does microsatellite instability predict the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer? A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Department of Oncology, APHP, Hôpital Avicenne, Bobigny, France.
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) (Impact Factor: 4.12). 06/2009; 45(10):1890-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.04.018
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Microsatellite instability (MSI) status in predicting the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer remains controversial.
Studies were identified through PubMed, Embase and ASCO proceedings with a combination of keywords (colorectal cancer, chemotherapy and MSI).
A MA was performed for treated and non-treated MSI population on seven studies. Statistical calculations were performed on 7 studies representing 3690 patients; mean age: 65.5 years; 810 stage II and 2444 stage III (75%). MSI-high (MSI-H) was found in 454 patients (14% of the global population), and microsatellite stable (MSS) in 2871. A total of 1444 patients received 5-fluorouracil (5FU)-based chemotherapy, whereas 1518 patients did not. For MSI-H patients, there was no statistically significant difference for RFS whether or not they received chemotherapy (5 studies); HR RFS: 0.96 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.62-1.49); HR OS (6 studies): 0.70 (95% CI: 0.44-1.09; p=0.12). Elsewhere, we found a significant interaction between MSI status (MSI-H or MSS) and therapeutic status suggesting a lesser benefit for MSI-H than for MSS patients (HR interaction RFS: 0.77 (95% CI: 0.67-0.87)).
We found similar RFS for treated and untreated MSI-H patients, showing that MSI-H status, in addition to being a good prognostic factor is also a predictive factor of non response.

1 Bookmark
 · 
381 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the prognostic significance of deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) and BRAF V600E in Thai sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. We studied a total of 211 out of 405 specimens obtained from newly diagnosed CRC patients between October 1, 2006 and December 31, 2007 at Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks of CRC tissue samples were analyzed for dMMR by detection of MMR protein expression loss by immunohistochemistry or microsatellite instability using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-DHPLC. BRAF V600E mutational analysis was performed in DNA extracted from the same archival tissues by two-round allele-specific PCR and analyzed by high sensitivity DHPLC. Associations between patient characteristics, MMR and BRAF status with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined by Kaplan-Meier survival plots and log-rank test together with Cox's proportional hazard regression. dMMR and BRAF V600E mutations were identified in 31 of 208 (14.9%) and 23 of 211 (10.9%) tumors, respectively. dMMR was more commonly found in patients with primary colon tumors rather than rectal cancer (20.4% vs 7.6%, P =0.01), but there was no difference in MMR status between the right-sided and left-sided colon tumors (20.8% vs 34.6%, P = 0.24). dMMR was associated with early-stage rather than metastatic disease (17.3% vs 0%, P = 0.015). No clinicopathological features such primary site or tumor differentiation were associated with the BRAF mutation. Six of 31 (19.3%) samples with dMMR carried the BRAF mutation, while 17 of 177 (9.6%) with proficient MMR (pMMR) harbored the mutation (P = 0.11). Notably, patients with dMMR tumors had significantly superior DFS (HR = 0.30, 95%CI: 0.15-0.77; P = 0.01) and OS (HR = 0.29, 95%CI: 0.10-0.84; P = 0.02) compared with patients with pMMR tumors. By contrast, the BRAF V600E mutation had no prognostic impact on DFS and OS. The prevalence of dMMR and BRAF V600E in Thai sporadic CRC patients was 15% and 11%, respectively. The dMMR phenotype was associated with a favorable outcome.
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 01/2015; 21(3):926-34. DOI:10.3748/wjg.v21.i3.926 · 2.43 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Colorectal cancers (CRCs) with a high level of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) are clinicopathologically distinct tumors characterized by predominance in females, proximal colonic localization, poor differentiation, mucinous histology, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, a Crohn's-like lymphoid reaction and a favorable prognosis. In terms of their molecular features, MSI-H CRCs are heterogeneous tumors associated with various genetic and epigenetic alterations, including DNA mismatch repair deficiency, target microsatellite mutations, BRAF mutations, a CpG island methylator phenotype-high (CIMP-H) status, and a low level of genomic hypomethylation. The molecular heterogeneity of MSI-H CRCs also depends on ethnic differences; for example, in Eastern Asian countries, relatively low frequencies of CIMP-H and BRAF mutations have been observed in MSI-H CRCs compared to Western countries. Although the prognostic features of MSI-H CRCs include a favorable survival of patients and low benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy, there may be prognostic differences based on the molecular heterogeneity of MSI-H CRCs. Here, we have reviewed and discussed the molecular and prognostic features of MSI-H CRCs, as well as several putative prognostic or predictive molecular markers, including HSP110 expression, beta2-microglobulin mutations, myosin 1a expression, CDX2/CK20 expression, SMAD4 expression, CIMP status and LINE-1 methylation levels.
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 04/2014; 20(15):4230-4243. DOI:10.3748/wjg.v20.i15.4230 · 2.43 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: At present, a radical shift in cancer treatment is occurring in terms of predictive, preventive and personalised medicine (PPPM). Individual patients will participate in more aspects of their health care. During the development of PPPM, many rapid, specific, and sensitive new methods for earlier detection of cancer will result in more efficient management of the patient, and hence a better quality of life. Coordination of the various activities among different healthcare professionals in primary, secondary, and tertiary care requires well-defined competencies, implementation of training and educational programs, sharing of data, and harmonized guidelines. In this position paper the current knowledge to understand cancer pre-disposition and risk factors, the cellular biology of cancer, predictive markers and treatment outcome, the improvement in technologies to screen, diagnose and provision of better drug development solutions, are discussed in the context of a better implementation of personalised medicine. Recognition of the major risk factors for cancer initiation is the key for preventive strategies [1]. Of interest, cancer predisposing syndromes in particular the monogenic subtypes that lead to cancer progression are well defined and one should focus on implementation strategies to identify individuals at risk to allow preventive measures and early screening/diagnosis. Implementation of such measures are disturbed by improper use of the data, with breach of data protection as one of the risks to be heavily controlled. Population screening requires in depth cost-benefit analysis to justify health care costs and the parameters screened should provide information that allow an actionable deliverable, for better health care provision.
    EPMA Journal, The 02/2015;

Full-text (3 Sources)

Download
115 Downloads
Available from
May 27, 2014