Article

No evidence for structural brain changes in young adolescents at ultra high risk for psychosis.

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Schizophrenia Research (Impact Factor: 4.59). 06/2009; 112(1-3):1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.04.013
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The onset of psychosis is thought to be preceded by neurodevelopmental changes in the brain. However, the timing of these changes has not been established. We investigated structural brain changes in a sample of young adolescents (12-18 years) at ultra high-risk for psychosis (UHR).
Structural MRI data from young UHR subjects (n=54) and typically developing, matched controls (n=54) were acquired with a 1.5 Tesla scanner and compared.
None of the measures differed between UHR subjects and controls.
Our results do not support the presence of gross neuroanatomical changes in young UHR subjects. This suggests that early changes are too subtle to detect with conventional imaging techniques. Therefore, changes observed in older cohorts may only onset later developmentally or occur secondary to prodromal symptoms.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
111 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: KEYWORDS Schizophrenia Structural MRI Genetic high-risk Prodrome Early-onset schizophrenia Childhood-onset schizophrenia KEY POINTS Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence indicates that the adolescent/ young adult development of individuals at genetic and clinical high risk for schizophrenia, as well as of persons with early-onset schizophrenia, is associated with smaller brain vol-umes, particularly in frontotemporal cortical areas. There is evidence implicating the disruption of both early (ie, perinatal) and late (ie, adoles-cent) normal neurodevelopmental processes, which lends support to the 2-hit neurodeve-lopmental model of schizophrenia. Future longitudinal studies that control for diagnostic variability, age and gender effects, and that examine the evolution of structural brain changes in at-risk youth/young adults in the context of evolving changes of white matter, brain function, and neurocognition will contribute to improving the clinical applicability of structural MRI findings during the premorbid and prodromal periods to early intervention strategies for illness prevention.
    Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America 01/2013; in press. · 2.60 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article reviews the literature on structural magnetic resonance imaging findings in pediatric and young adult populations at clinical or genetic high-risk for schizophrenia and early-onset schizophrenia. The implications of this research are discussed for understanding the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and for early intervention strategies. The evidence linking brain structural changes in prepsychosis development and early-onset schizophrenia with disruptions of normal neurodevelopmental processes during childhood or adolescence is described. Future directions are outlined for research to address knowledge gaps regarding the neurobiological basis of brain structural abnormalities in schizophrenia and to improve the usefulness of these abnormalities for preventative interventions.
    Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America 10/2013; 22(4):689-714. · 2.88 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have reported multiple activation foci associated with a variety of conditions, stimuli or tasks. However, most of these studies used fewer than 40 participants. After extracting data (number of subjects, condition studied, number of foci identified and threshold) from 94 brain fMRI meta-analyses (k = 1,788 unique datasets) published through December of 2011, we analyzed the correlation between individual study sample sizes and number of significant foci reported. We also performed an analysis where we evaluated each meta-analysis to test whether there was a correlation between the sample size of the meta-analysis and the number of foci that it had identified. Correlation coefficients were then combined across all meta-analyses to obtain a summary correlation coefficient with a fixed effects model and we combine correlation coefficients, using a Fisher's z transformation. There was no correlation between sample size and the number of foci reported in single studies (r = 0.0050) but there was a strong correlation between sample size and number of foci in meta-analyses (r = 0.62, p<0.001). Only studies with sample sizes <45 identified larger (>40) numbers of foci and claimed as many discovered foci as studies with sample sizes ≥45, whereas meta-analyses yielded a limited number of foci relative to the yield that would be anticipated from smaller single studies. These results are consistent with possible reporting biases affecting small fMRI studies and suggest the need to promote standardized large-scale evidence in this field. It may also be that small studies may be analyzed and reported in ways that may generate a larger number of claimed foci or that small fMRI studies with inconclusive, null, or not very promising results may not be published at all.
    PLoS ONE 01/2013; 8(7):e70104. · 3.53 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
38 Downloads
Available from
May 28, 2014