No evidence for structural brain changes in young adolescents at ultra high risk for psychosis

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Schizophrenia Research (Impact Factor: 3.92). 06/2009; 112(1-3):1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.04.013
Source: PubMed


The onset of psychosis is thought to be preceded by neurodevelopmental changes in the brain. However, the timing of these changes has not been established. We investigated structural brain changes in a sample of young adolescents (12-18 years) at ultra high-risk for psychosis (UHR).
Structural MRI data from young UHR subjects (n=54) and typically developing, matched controls (n=54) were acquired with a 1.5 Tesla scanner and compared.
None of the measures differed between UHR subjects and controls.
Our results do not support the presence of gross neuroanatomical changes in young UHR subjects. This suggests that early changes are too subtle to detect with conventional imaging techniques. Therefore, changes observed in older cohorts may only onset later developmentally or occur secondary to prodromal symptoms.

Download full-text


Available from: Tim Ziermans,
56 Reads
  • Source
    • "very few foci identified) may not be published at all. For example, recent voxel-based meta-analyses of structural studies in early psychosis [27], [28] uncovered only one study reporting no significant between-group results [29]. Peer-reviews should be as strict when assessing the methods of a study reporting abnormalities in expected brain regions, as when assessing the methods of a study not finding any expectable finding. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have reported multiple activation foci associated with a variety of conditions, stimuli or tasks. However, most of these studies used fewer than 40 participants. After extracting data (number of subjects, condition studied, number of foci identified and threshold) from 94 brain fMRI meta-analyses (k = 1,788 unique datasets) published through December of 2011, we analyzed the correlation between individual study sample sizes and number of significant foci reported. We also performed an analysis where we evaluated each meta-analysis to test whether there was a correlation between the sample size of the meta-analysis and the number of foci that it had identified. Correlation coefficients were then combined across all meta-analyses to obtain a summary correlation coefficient with a fixed effects model and we combine correlation coefficients, using a Fisher's z transformation. There was no correlation between sample size and the number of foci reported in single studies (r = 0.0050) but there was a strong correlation between sample size and number of foci in meta-analyses (r = 0.62, p<0.001). Only studies with sample sizes <45 identified larger (>40) numbers of foci and claimed as many discovered foci as studies with sample sizes ≥45, whereas meta-analyses yielded a limited number of foci relative to the yield that would be anticipated from smaller single studies. These results are consistent with possible reporting biases affecting small fMRI studies and suggest the need to promote standardized large-scale evidence in this field. It may also be that small studies may be analyzed and reported in ways that may generate a larger number of claimed foci or that small fMRI studies with inconclusive, null, or not very promising results may not be published at all.
    PLoS ONE 07/2013; 8(7):e70104. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0070104 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Measurement of deformation along the surface of sheet metal during the forming process helps in determining the surface profile, thickness profile, and the state of the stress. Knowledge of these process parameters during the forming process helps in controlling the forming process and the quality of the finished products. The authors describe a nonintrusive strain evaluation technique by which in-plane and out-of-plane coordinates are independently measured and correlated to give an overall strain profile. The principles of the technique and some preliminary results are presented
    System Theory, 1990., Twenty-Second Southeastern Symposium on; 04/1990
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although schizophrenia is characterized by gray matter (GM) abnormalities, particularly in the prefrontal and temporal cortices, it is unclear whether cerebral cortical GM is abnormal in individuals at ultra-high-risk (UHR) for psychosis. We addressed this issue by studying cortical thickness in this group with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We measured cortical thickness of 29 individuals with no family history of psychosis at UHR, 31 patients with schizophrenia, and 29 healthy matched control subjects using automated surface-based analysis of structural MRI data. Hemispheric mean and regional cortical thickness were significantly different according to the stage of the disease. Significant cortical differences across these 3 groups were found in the distributed area of cerebral cortices. UHR group showed significant cortical thinning in the prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, inferior parietal cortex, parahippocampal cortex, and superior temporal gyrus compared with healthy control subjects. Significant cortical thinning in schizophrenia group relative to UHR group was found in all the regions described above in addition with posterior cingulate cortex, insular cortex, and precentral cortex. These changes were more pronounced in the schizophrenia group compared with the control subjects. These findings suggest that UHR is associated with cortical thinning in regions that correspond to the structural abnormalities found in schizophrenia. These structural abnormalities might reflect functional decline at the prodromal stage of schizophrenia, and there may be progressive thinning of GM cortex over time.
    Schizophrenia Bulletin 12/2009; 37(4):839-49. DOI:10.1093/schbul/sbp151 · 8.45 Impact Factor
Show more