Variety enhances food intake in humans: Role of sensory-specific satiety
Centre Européen des Sciences du Goût, UMR CNRS 5170, Dijon, France. Physiology & Behavior
(Impact Factor: 2.98).
04/2009; 97(1):44-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.01.019
Twenty-one subjects were studied to evaluate the effect of renewal of sensory stimulations of previously eaten foods on sensory-specific satiety and intake. The subjects ate French fries then brownie cakes ad libitum in three situations: "monotonous" - fries then brownies were consumed alone; "simultaneous" - condiments (ketchup and mayonnaise for the fries, vanilla cream and whipped cream for the brownies) were added during intakes; "successive" - after intake of fries alone, ketchup then mayonnaise were available with fries and, after intake of brownies alone, vanilla cream then whipped cream were offered with brownies. The quantities eaten in the "simultaneous" and "successive" situations were higher (p<0.001) than those in the "monotonous" one (1485+/-582 and 1682+/-777 kcal vs 1195+/-552 kcal, respectively). In the "successive" situation, hedonic ratings for fries diminished during intake but increased after the introduction of ketchup, leading to additional intake of fries. Similarly, hedonic ratings for brownies diminished during intake and increased after the introduction of vanilla cream leading to additional brownie intake (mayonnaise and whipped cream had no significant effect). Food variety, obtained by adding condiments can increase food intake in the short term. The mechanism by which food consumption is increased after the addition of condiments is introduced is at least partly related to the attenuation of sensory-satiety for a given food.
Available from: Ellen Van Kleef
- "This can for example be done by lowering the energy density of a food when adding water or air (Bell et al., 2003; Benelam, 2009; Rolls et al., 1999; Rolls et al., 2000; Rolls et al., 1998) or by increasing the chewiness and denseness of a product by adding certain types of fibres (Camire et al., 2007; de Graaf, 2005). For the development of satiation it can be beneficial to limit the variety of colours and tastes within a meal (Brondel et al., 2009). "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Inadequate regulation of food intake plays an important role in the development of overweight and obesity, and is under the influence of both the internal appetite control system and external environmental cues. Especially in environments where food is overly available, external cues seem to override and/or undermine internal signals, which put severe challenges on the accurate regulation of food intake. By structuring these external cues around five different phases in the food consumption process this paper aims to provide an overview of the wide range of external cues that potentially facilitate or hamper internal signals and with that influence food intake. For each of the five phases of the food consumption process, meal initiation, meal planning, consumption phase, end of eating episode and time till next meal, the most relevant internal signals are discussed and it is explained how specific external cues exert their influence.
Critical reviews in food science and nutrition 10/2015; DOI:10.1080/10408398.2015.1073140 · 5.18 Impact Factor
Available from: Michel Meuret
- "Offering a variety of foods in a meal consistently increases intake (Brondel et al., 2009; Hetherington, 1996; Sørensen, Møller, Flint, Martens, & Raben, 2003), the more different the foods are the greater the enhancement (Rolls et al., 1981), and desserts rekindle appetite when a person is presented with foods that differ from the appetizer and main courses (Remick, "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We contend that palates link herbivores and humans with landscapes and consider how these relationships have changed historically. An attuned palate, which enables herbivores to meet needs for nutrients and self-medicate to rectify maladies, evolves from three interrelated processes: flavor-feedback associations, availability of phytochemically rich foods, and learning in utero and early in life to eat nourishing combinations of foods. That occurs when wild or domestic herbivores forage on phytochemically rich landscapes, is less common when domestic herbivores forage on monoculture pastures, is close to zero for herbivores in feedlots, and is increasingly rare for people who forage in modern food outlets. Unlike our ancestors, the palates of many individuals are no longer linked in healthy ways with landscapes. Industrial farming and selection for yield, appearance, and transportability diminished the flavor, phytochemical richness, and nutritive value of fruits and vegetables for humans. Phytochemically impoverished pastures and feedlot diets can adversely affect the health of livestock and the flavor and nutritive value of meat and milk products for humans. While flavors of produce, meat, and dairy have become blander, processed foods have become more desirable as people have learned to link synthetic flavors with feedback from energy-rich compounds that obscure nutritional sameness and diminish health. Thus, the roles plants and animals once played in nutrition have been usurped by processed foods that are altered, fortified, and enriched in ways that can adversely affect appetitive states and food preferences. The need to amend foods, and to take nutrient supplements, could be reduced by creating phytochemically rich plants and herbivores and by creating cultures that know how to combine foods into meals that nourish and satiate.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Appetite 08/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2015.08.004 · 2.69 Impact Factor
Available from: Danielle Ferriday
- "Research investigating the effects of meal variety has tended to concentrate on the physiological and psychological processes that promote meal termination (e.g., sensory-specific satiety (Brondel et al., 2009; Raynor & Epstein, 2001; Rolls et al., 1981; Rolls, Van Duijvenvoorde, & Rolls, 1984). However, recent research suggests that meal size is very often planned, and therefore determined, in advance of eating (Fay et al., 2011; Hinton et al., 2013). "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Meal variety has been shown to increase energy intake in humans by an average of 29%. Historically, research exploring the mechanism underlying this effect has focused on physiological and psychological processes that terminate a meal (e.g., sensory-specific satiety). We sought to explore whether meal variety stimulates intake by influencing pre-meal planning. We know that individuals use prior experience with a food to estimate the extent to which it will deliver fullness. These ‘expected satiation’ judgments may be straightforward when only one meal component needs to be considered but it remains unclear how prospective satiation is estimated when a meal comprises multiple items. We hypothesised that people simplify the task by using a heuristic, or ‘cognitive shortcut.’ Specifically, as within-meal variety increases, expected satiation tends to be based on the perceived volume of food(s) rather than on prior experience. In each trial, participants (N = 68) were shown a plate of food with six buffet food items. Across trials the number of different foods varied in the range one to six. In separate tasks, the participants provided an estimate of their combined expected satiation and volume. When meal variety was high, judgments of perceived volume and expected satiation ‘converged.’ This is consistent with a common underlying response strategy. By contrast, the low variety meals produced dissociable responses, suggesting that judgments of expected satiation were not governed solely by perceived volume. This evidence for a ‘volume heuristic’ was especially clear in people who were less familiar with the meal items. Together, these results are important because they expose a novel process by which meal variety might increase food intake in humans.
Appetite 01/2015; 89. DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2015.01.010 · 2.69 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.