Li-O2 Cells Based on Hierarchically Structured Porous α-MnO2 Catalyst and an Imidazolium Based Ionic Liquid Electrolyte
International journal of electrochemical science (Impact Factor: 1.5). 03/2013; 8(3):3912.
Highly crystalline α-MnO2 is synthesized by facile reduction of KMnO4 in acidic solution. The obtained α-MnO2 exhibits a high specific surface area of about 156 m2g-1 with a hierarchical bimodal porous structure. The TEM analysis confirmed that the α-MnO2 is highly crystalline and exists in the form of nano-rods agglomerated to form the shape of sphere. It is a promising electro-active material that can act as an oxygen reduction catalyst to improve the recharge ability of lithium-oxygen cells. The cell with α-MnO2 as catalyst and commercially available imidazolium-based room temperature ionic liquid with LiClO4 as electrolyte displayed an initial discharge capacity of 900 mAhg-1 which, after prolonged cycling, reached a stable value of about 600 mAhg-1 with a high recharge efficiency (~ 90%) and good capacity retention. Thus α-MnO2 catalyst along with ionic liquid based electrolyte could be an effective combination to obtain improved capacity and durability in a rechargeable lithium-O2 batteries.
- The Lithium Air Battery: Fundamentals, Edited by Nobuyuki Imanishi, Alan C. Luntz, Peter G. Bruce, 04/2014: chapter Air Electrodes for Aqueous Lithium Air Batteries: pages 201-214; Springer., ISBN: 978-1-4899-8061-8
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Rechargeable Li-air (henceforth referred to as Li-O2) batteries provide theoretical capacities that are ten times higher than that of current Li-ion batteries, which could enable the driving range of an electric vehicle to be comparable to that of gasoline vehicles. These high energy densities in Li-O2 batteries result from the atypical battery architecture which consists of an air (O2) cathode and a pure lithium metal anode. However, hurdles to their widespread use abound with issues at the cathode (relating to electrocatalysis and cathode decomposition), lithium metal anode (high reactivity towards moisture) and due to electrolyte decomposition. This review focuses on the key scientific challenges in the development of rechargeable non-aqueous Li-O2 batteries from both experimental and theoretical findings. This dual approach allows insight into future research directions to be provided and highlights the importance of combining theoretical and experimental approaches in the optimization of Li-O2 battery systems.Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 05/2014; 16(24). DOI:10.1039/c4cp01309c · 4.49 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Novel graphene/carbon nanotubes (CNTs)/manganese oxide (MnO2) nanocomposites plus CNTs (GMC + C) and graphene/CNTs hybrid (GC) thin-film electrodes are prepared by electrophoretic deposition (EPD). These nanocomposite electrodes exhibit high surface area and interconnected pore networks. The GMC + C nanocomposite electrode shows excellent specific capacitance of 964 F g−1 at 1 A g−1, rate capability with the residual capacitance of 529 F g−1 at 500 mV s−1, and fast Na+ diffusion with intercalation value of 6.34 × 10−7 cm2 s−1, and deintercalation value of 8.86 × 10−7 cm2 s−1. Such excellent pseudocapacitive performances are attributed to low ion/electron transport resistances and short ion/electron diffusion lengths. Furthermore, novel aqueous electrolyte-based asymmetric pseudocapacitor having 1.8 V cell voltage is successfully fabricated using GMC + C nanocomposite as a cathode and GC nanocomposite as an anode. The optimized asymmetric pseudocapacitor possesses superior performance with a maximum energy density of record high 304 Wh kg−1 and retaining 56.2% of its initial specific energy density at the power density up to 242 kW kg−1. In addition, the asymmetric cell configuration also shows excellent cycling stability with 89% specific capacitance maintained after 10,000 cycles. These results suggest that our designed asymmetric pseudocapacitors have a high potential for practical applications.Journal of Power Sources 08/2014; 259:145–153. DOI:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.094 · 6.22 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.