Article
Safety and efficacy of first-line bevacizumab with FOLFOX, XELOX, FOLFIRI and fluoropyrimidines in metastatic colorectal cancer: the BEAT study.
University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
Annals of Oncology (impact factor:
6.43).
05/2009;
20(11):1842-7.
DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdp233
pp.1842-7
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (8)
-
Article: Evaluating the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with monoclonal antibodies.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The ability to tailor biologic therapy based on the status of tumor biomarkers and monoclonal antibodies has become very important in the last years. The role of tumor biomarkers in treating colorectal cancer, specifically the K-RAS gene, was identified. K-RAS had a higher interest after Lievre and colleagues reported at the 2008 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting, their analysis of K-RAS mutations in tumors from patients who did not appear to benefit from cetuximab therapy, providing additional data involving K-RAS mutant tumors and their lack of response to cetuximab, as part of first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Furthermore, other trials evaluated the K-RAS status and the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, the treatment of refractory metastatic cancer and dual-antibody therapy in the first-line treatment of colorectal cancer. Patients with mutant K-RAS colorectal tumors have no benefit from cetuximab, no matter the type of chemotherapy regimen.Journal of medicine and life 06/2012; 5(2):168-72. -
Dataset: OgawaBVodontitis@IJCO2012
-
Article: XELOX and bevacizumab followed by single-agent bevacizumab as maintenance therapy as first-line treatment in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer: the boxe study.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: The addition of bevacizumab to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). An increased risk of arterial thromboembolic events has been observed in some trials in older patients, and the potential benefit of a maintenance therapy with bevacizumab alone has not been clearly demonstrated. This phase II study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of XELOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin) plus bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab alone in elderly patients with advanced CRC. METHODS: Treatment consisted of bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 1, plus capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14, every 3 weeks up to a maximum of 8 cycles. Patients then received maintenance therapy consisting of bevacizumab alone (7.5 mg/kg) once every 3 weeks up to disease progression. The primary study end-points were safety and response rate. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were recruited. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the overall response rate was 52 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 37 to 68 %], with 86 % of patients achieving disease control. Median PFS and overall survival were 11.5 months (95 % CI 10.0-12.9 months) and 19.3 months (95 % CI 16.5-22.1 months), respectively. In all, 10 patients (23 %) had grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs), the most common being diarrhea (9 %), neutropenia (7 %), peripheral neuropathy (7 %), and stomatitis (7 %). No patients died because of treatment-related AEs. The rate of bevacizumab-related AEs (hypertension, thromboembolic events, and gastrointestinal perforation) was consistent with that reported earlier in the general CRC population. CONCLUSION: The combination of XELOX and bevacizumab is effective and has a manageable tolerability profile when administered to elderly patients with advanced CRC. Maintenance therapy with single-agent bevacizumab may be considered to extend PFS in this setting of patients.Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 10/2012; · 2.83 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
1914 assessable patients
arterial thromboembolism
BEAT study
bevacizumab [5 mg/kg
Bevacizumab Expanded Access Trial
BRiTE study
capecitabine regimens)]
gastrointestinal perforation
large observational study
median age 59 years
Median PFS
metastatic colorectal cancer
physician's choice
prospective data collection
prospective randomised clinical trials
routine clinical practice
safety profile
Serious/grade 3-5 adverse events
Sixty-day mortality
unresectable mCRC