Re-evaluation of model-based light-scattering spectroscopy for tissue spectroscopy

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, George R. Harrison Spectroscopy Laboratory, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Journal of Biomedical Optics (Impact Factor: 2.86). 03/2009; 14(2):024031. DOI: 10.1117/1.3116708
Source: PubMed


Model-based light scattering spectroscopy (LSS) seemed a promising technique for in-vivo diagnosis of dysplasia in multiple organs. In the studies, the residual spectrum, the difference between the observed and modeled diffuse reflectance spectra, was attributed to single elastic light scattering from epithelial nuclei, and diagnostic information due to nuclear changes was extracted from it. We show that this picture is incorrect. The actual single scattering signal arising from epithelial nuclei is much smaller than the previously computed residual spectrum, and does not have the wavelength dependence characteristic of Mie scattering. Rather, the residual spectrum largely arises from assuming a uniform hemoglobin distribution. In fact, hemoglobin is packaged in blood vessels, which alters the reflectance. When we include vessel packaging, which accounts for an inhomogeneous hemoglobin distribution, in the diffuse reflectance model, the reflectance is modeled more accurately, greatly reducing the amplitude of the residual spectrum. These findings are verified via numerical estimates based on light propagation and Mie theory, tissue phantom experiments, and analysis of published data measured from Barrett's esophagus. In future studies, vessel packaging should be included in the model of diffuse reflectance and use of model-based LSS should be discontinued.

Download full-text


Available from: Michael Wallace, Jun 27, 2015
9 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It has long been speculated that underlying variations in tissue anatomy affect in vivo spectroscopic measurements. We investigate the effects of cervical anatomy on reflectance and fluorescence spectroscopy to guide the development of a diagnostic algorithm for identifying high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) free of the confounding effects of anatomy. We use spectroscopy in both contact probe and imaging modes to study patients undergoing either colposcopy or treatment for HSIL. Physical models of light propagation in tissue are used to extract parameters related to tissue morphology and biochemistry. Our results show that the transformation zone, the area in which the vast majority of HSILs are found, is spectroscopically distinct from the adjacent squamous mucosa, and that these anatomical differences can directly influence spectroscopic diagnostic parameters. Specifically, we demonstrate that performance of diagnostic algorithms for identifying HSILs is artificially enhanced when clinically normal squamous sites are included in the statistical analysis of the spectroscopic data. We conclude that underlying differences in tissue anatomy can have a confounding effect on diagnostic spectroscopic parameters and that the common practice of including clinically normal squamous sites in cervical spectroscopy results in artificially improved performance in distinguishing HSILs from clinically suspicious non-HSILs.
    Journal of Biomedical Optics 01/2009; 14(4):044021. DOI:10.1117/1.3194142 · 2.86 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Reflectance spectra measured from epithelial tissue have been used to extract size distribution and refractive index of cell nuclei for noninvasive detection of precancerous changes. Despite many in vitro and in vivo experimental results, the underlying mechanism of sizing nuclei based on modeling nuclei as homogeneous spheres and fitting the measured data with Mie theory has not been fully explored. We describe the implementation of a three-dimensional finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulation tool using a Gaussian pulse as the light source to investigate the wavelength-dependent characteristics of backscattered light from a nuclear model consisting of a nucleolus and clumps of chromatin embedded in homogeneous nucleoplasm. The results show that small-sized heterogeneities within the nuclei generate about five times higher backscattering than homogeneous spheres. More interestingly, backscattering spectra from heterogeneous spherical nuclei show periodic oscillations similar to those from homogeneous spheres, leading to high accuracy of estimating the nuclear diameter by comparison with Mie theory. In addition to the application in light scattering spectroscopy, the reported FDTD method could be adapted to study the relations between measured spectral data and nuclear structures in other optical imaging and spectroscopic techniques for in vivo diagnosis.
    Journal of Biomedical Optics 01/2010; 15(1):015007. DOI:10.1117/1.3324838 · 2.86 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A unique optical property of biological tissue is high anisotropy so that light is scattered in the same direction with respect to the incident direction. We demonstrate that simple back-directional gating allows us to take advantage of such an intrinsic property of biological tissue to significantly suppress unwanted diffuse light. In back-directional gated imaging, the high anisotropic property of the surrounding medium can serve as a waveguide in a moderate depth. Although this idea is straightforward, it has not been utilized for diffuse light suppression and imaging quality improvement such as contrast and resolution in large-area imaging for biological tissue. We further show that by combining a spectral analysis with back-directional gated imaging, image contrast and depth can be dramatically enhanced for visualizing stromal microvascular blood content in a relatively large area. Because microvasculature can be heterogeneous, our imaging approach can permit detailed visualization of microvascularity in a relatively large area up to ~20 mm x 20 mm.
    Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering 02/2010; DOI:10.1117/12.841390 · 0.20 Impact Factor
Show more