Article

The Forgotten Learning Disability: Epidemiology of Written-Language Disorder in a Population-Based Birth Cohort (1976-1982), Rochester, Minnesota

Mayo Clinic, Department of Health Sciences Research, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
PEDIATRICS (Impact Factor: 5.3). 06/2009; 123(5):1306-13. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2008-2098
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to report the incidence rates and other epidemiologic characterizations of written-language disorder. There have been no epidemiologic studies on the incidence of written-language disorder in the United States, and the use of a population-based birth cohort, longitudinally followed, is the most powerful method for reaching this objective.
In this population-based, retrospective birth cohort study, subjects included 5718 children born between 1976 and 1982 in Rochester, Minnesota, who remained in the community after 5 years of age. Records from all public and nonpublic schools, medical facilities, and private tutorial services were reviewed and results of all individually administered IQ and achievement tests, and extensive medical, educational, and socioeconomic information, were collected. The essential features of writing problems from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision were included in our operationalized definition of written-language disorder. Written-language disorder incident cases were established by using research criteria based on 3 formulas (regression-based discrepancy, nonregression-based discrepancy, and low achievement).
Cumulative incidence rates of written-language disorder varied from 6.9% to 14.7% depending on the formula. Boys were 2 to 3 times more likely to be affected than girls regardless of the formula. Among all written-language disorder cases (N = 806), 25% (n = 203) had written-language disorder without a reading disability. Specifics of the writing problems were identified for 87% (n = 702) of written-language disorder cases.
In this population-based birth cohort of school-aged children, written-language disorder was at least as frequent as reading disabilities and significantly more frequent among boys than girls.

0 Followers
 · 
82 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Rotation, its physiological processing, as well as how this lateralized direction of movement is sensed, is regularly taken for granted and little appreciated when studying how learning develops. Preference for di-rection of rotational movement and how one processes this information has been found to differ greatly from one individual to another. This report discusses how bimanual rotational hand use preference and reversed direction of body part and movement sensation detection may be utilized to help identify certain currently unrecognized classroom learning difficulties. What we label Reversed Positioning Sensation (RPS) is evidenced in our research and is found in many children and adults presently identified as "learning disabled" and/or "hyperactive" or just those considered "bright underachievers". Easily admin-istered tests to help identify individuals who may be at risk are discussed. When RPS occurs without the necessary sensory-motor accommodation or compensation, we theorize that written language disability (WLD), as well as compromised organizational skills often identified as ADHD, result. In addition, this paper discusses a summary of our findings examining families with biologically related family members reporting primary difficulties related to organization and written language skills. Case studies from four of the many families we have studied demonstrate how to determine if an individual is able to sense his/her own body extremities in correctly functioning or maladaptive directional orientation. In some cases, just changing a writing hand position has been shown to help overcome many of the problems of RPS. This change is meant is to redirect the writing hand movement to sense a top/down orientation.
    Psychology 01/2012; 03(01). DOI:10.4236/psych.2012.31006
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Anesthetics administered to immature brains may cause histopathological changes and long-term behavioral abnormalities. The association between perinatal exposure to anesthetics during Cesarean delivery (CD) and development of learning disabilities (LD) was determined in a population-based birth cohort. The educational and medical records of all children born to mothers residing in five townships of Olmsted County, Minnesota from 1976-1982 and remaining in the community at age 5 were reviewed to identify those with LDs. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to compare rates of LD between children delivered vaginally and via CD (with general or regional anesthesia). Of the 5,320 children in this cohort, 497 were delivered via CD (under general anesthesia n = 193, and regional anesthesia n = 304). The incidence of LD depended on mode of delivery (P = 0.050, adjusted for sex, birth weight, gestational age, exposure to anesthesia before age 4 yr, and maternal education). LD risk was similar in children delivered by vagina or CD with general anesthesia, but was reduced in children receiving CD with regional anesthesia (hazard ratio = 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.44 to 0.92; P = 0.017 for comparison of CD under regional anesthesia compared to vaginal delivery). Children exposed to general or regional anesthesia during CD are not more likely to develop LD compared to children delivered vaginally, suggesting that brief perinatal exposure to anesthetic drugs does not adversely affect long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. The risk of LD may be lower in children delivered by CD whose mothers received regional anesthesia.
    Anesthesiology 09/2009; 111(2):302-10. DOI:10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181adf481 · 6.17 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study examined the preschool predictors of elementary school narrative writing skills. The sample included 65 typically developing African American children, ranging in age from 5.0 to 5.5 years, and was 44.6% male. Targeted preschool predictors included measures of phonological processing, core language abilities, prereading skills, and early writing concepts assessed during the spring or summer, just before beginning kindergarten. Using hierarchical linear modeling, findings showed that core language abilities, prereading skills, and maternal education at preschool significantly predicted the level of writing in Grades 3–5, but only core language abilities and prereading skills significantly predicted the rate of growth in writing. When kindergartners were separated into low and high readers, and low and high core language abilities, a significant pattern of widening differences emerged between the groups over time. These findings point to core language abilities, prereading skills, and maternal education assessed at kindergarten entry as critical predictors of later narrative writing skills, and they suggest the importance of including such measures when screening for written language problems in early kindergarten and early elementary school. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
    School Psychology Quarterly 02/2010; 25(1):1-12. DOI:10.1037/a0018329 · 1.45 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
1 Download
Available from