Psychometric validation of the Spanish version of the Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ).

Hospital Universitario, 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Actas espanolas de psiquiatria (Impact Factor: 1.2). 10/2008; 37(2):94-100.
Source: PubMed


The main aim of this study was to make a Spanish adaption of the international Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ) that assesses the quality of patient-doctor relationship in Spanish patients admitted to an Internal Medicine Service under conditions of regular clinical practice.
A total of 188 adult patients of 6 Internal Medicine physicians from a University Hospital in downtown Madrid were analyzed. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were collected and the PDRQ Spanish version questionnaire was administered.
Results showed excellent psychometric data on reliability, factorial, and construct validity. Furthermore, based on scientific literature, criteria validity was determined, considering continuity of care as external criteria. Results ratify previous data related to positive relation between quality of doctor-patient relation and continuity of care.
The Spanish 13 item version of the PDRQ (CREM-P in Spanish) proved to be a valid instrument for assessing the quality of patient-doctor relation in adult patients, with clinical and research value.

Download full-text


Available from: Raquel Rodríguez- Carvajal,
  • Source
    • "Data quality: Similar to the Dutch [8] and Spanish studies [10], [11], ceiling effects were detected in the German PDRQ-9. The ability of the PDRQ-9 to discriminate within the upper region of satisfaction with PDR is insufficient [8], [11]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The patient-doctor relationship (PDR) as perceived by the patient is an important concept in primary care and psychotherapy. The PDR Questionnaire (PDRQ-9) provides a brief measure of the therapeutic aspects of the PDR in primary care. We assessed the internal and external validity of the German version of the PDRQ-9 in a representative cross-sectional German population survey that included 2,275 persons aged≥14 years who reported consulting with a primary care physician (PCP). The acceptance of the German version of this questionnaire was good. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the PRDQ-9 was unidimensional. The internal reliability (Cronbach's α) of the total score was .95. The corrected item-total correlations were≥.94. The mean satisfaction index of persons with a probable depressive disorder was lower than that of persons without a probable depressive disorder, indicating good discriminative concurrent criterion validity. The correlation coefficient between satisfaction with PDR and satisfaction with pain therapy was r = .51 in 489 persons who reported chronic pain, indicating good convergent validity. Despite the limitation of low variance in the PDRQ-9 total scores, the results indicate that the German version of the PDRQ-9 is a brief questionnaire with good psychometric properties to assess German patients' perceived therapeutic alliance with PCPs in public health research.
    PLoS ONE 03/2014; 9(3):e91964. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0091964 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: The main aim of the study was to examine the impact of patients' ethnic diversity on the patient satisfaction level to psychiatry care and explores the satisfaction domains with mental health care. Design: This is a prospective cross sectional study. Setting: Psychiatry department of the Hamad Medical Corporation. Subjects: The study sample was Qatari and other Arab nationals aged 18 to 65 years who visited the psychiatry department during the study period; April 2009 to August 2009. A total of 1300 adult patients were approached and 1054 (81.1%) expressed their consent to participate in this study. Method: A standard forward-backward procedure was applied to translate the English version of the PDRQ to Arabic. PDRQ was administered by pre-trained nurses among the psychiatry patients. The main outcome measures of the study were 13-item patient doctor relationship questionnaire (PDRQ) score and other 11 items assessing what patients need from psychiatrists. Also, Socio-demographic data of the patients was collected. Results: Of the studied patients, there were 479 Qataris (45.4%) and 575 other Arabs (54.6%). There was a significant differences found between Qatari and Arab expatriate patients in marital status (p=0.036), level of education (p<0.001), occupation (p<0.001), household income (p<0.001), number of rooms in the house (p<0.001) and people living in the house (p<0.001). Arab expatriate patients (480;55.9%) were more satisfied with psychiatry care than Qatari patients (378;44.1%) especially in the age group (18-34) years of both the ethnic groups (164;43.4% vs 214;44.6%). Overall patient satisfaction level was significantly higher in literate Arab patients with secondary and university degree (333;69.3%), while it was lower in Qataris (185;49%). Satisfaction score was almost the same between Qatari and Arab expatriate patients with no significant difference. But satisfaction score was significantly higher in Spanish population in all domains of satisfaction compared to our study sample (p<0.0001). Conclusions: The study findings revealed that there is no ethnic difference observed in the satisfaction score between Qatari and Arab expatriate patients in Qatar, but a significant difference was observed between Arab and Spanish psychiatry patients in all domains of satisfaction.
    The Open Psychiatry Journal 05/2010; 4(1). DOI:10.2174/1874354401004010019
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Identify the economic value the user attributes to the visit to the family physician, in a setting of a National Health System, by the Willingness to Pay (WTP) expressed. Economic evaluation study, by the contingent valuation method. Questions were asked about WTP using a payment card format. Interviews were conducted with 451 subjects, in areas with different socioeconomic characteristics. An ordered probit was used to evaluate model's validity. Median WTP expressed was euro18 (interquartile range euro8-28), not including "zero-answers" of thirty-four subjects (7.5%). This value represents 2% of average adjusted family incomes. Patients with higher incomes or with chronic illnesses presented a probability of 5-14 percentage points of expressing a high WTP. For every point of increase of patient satisfaction, the probability of presenting a WTP in the lowest range decreases 7.0 percentage points. Subjects with a low education level and those older than 65 expressed a lower WTP. Accessibility, risk perception, nationality and having private insurance were not related to the WTP expressed. Users of primary care have a clear perception of the economic value of care received from the family physician, even in a framework of providing services financed by taxes and without cost at the moment of use. This value increases in subjects with higher incomes, with greater need for care, or more satisfied.
    Health Policy 11/2009; 94(3):266-72. DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.11.001 · 1.91 Impact Factor
Show more