Article

Psychometric validation of the Spanish version of the Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ).

Hospital Universitario, 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Actas espanolas de psiquiatria (Impact Factor: 0.45). 10/2008; 37(2):94-100.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The main aim of this study was to make a Spanish adaption of the international Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ) that assesses the quality of patient-doctor relationship in Spanish patients admitted to an Internal Medicine Service under conditions of regular clinical practice.
A total of 188 adult patients of 6 Internal Medicine physicians from a University Hospital in downtown Madrid were analyzed. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were collected and the PDRQ Spanish version questionnaire was administered.
Results showed excellent psychometric data on reliability, factorial, and construct validity. Furthermore, based on scientific literature, criteria validity was determined, considering continuity of care as external criteria. Results ratify previous data related to positive relation between quality of doctor-patient relation and continuity of care.
The Spanish 13 item version of the PDRQ (CREM-P in Spanish) proved to be a valid instrument for assessing the quality of patient-doctor relation in adult patients, with clinical and research value.

2 Bookmarks
 · 
123 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The doctor-patient relationship has been linked to patient satisfaction, treatment adherence, and treatment outcome. Many different instruments have been developed to assess this relationship. The large variety makes it difficult to compare results of different studies and choose an instrument for future research. This review aims to provide an overview of the existing instruments assessing the doctor-patient relationship. We performed a systematic search in PubMed, PsychInfo, EMBASE, and Web of Science for questionnaires measuring the doctor-patient relationship. We appraised each instrument ascertaining the questionnaires focused on the doctor-patient relationship. We compared the content and psychometric characteristics of the instruments. We found 19 instruments assessing the doctor-patient relationship. The instruments assess a variety of dimensions and use diverse conceptual models for the doctor-patient relationship. The instruments found also vary in terms to which they have been psychometrically tested. We have provided an overview of 19 instruments assessing the doctor-patient relationship. The selection of an instrument for future research should be based on the model or conceptual basis of the doctor-patient relationship that is most applicable to the study objectives and the health care field in which it will be applied.
    Journal of clinical epidemiology 01/2012; 65(1):10-5. · 5.33 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Health workers are continually faced to great pressure, often related to high emotional demands of the caregivers-patient relationship in the workplace. In this con¬text, emotion regulation strategies are shown as an important personal resource to ma¬nage emotions toward desirable goals. This article presents a review of the literature about the emotional influence in job context, the different models and strategies of emo¬tional regulation and how they influence on well-being, health and professional-patient relationship. In addition, we compare the efficacy of different regulation strategies and their differential effect on colleague and patient relationships
    Norte de Salud Mental. 01/2011; 9(41-ISSN: 1578-4940):38-48.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The patient-doctor relationship (PDR) as perceived by the patient is an important concept in primary care and psychotherapy. The PDR Questionnaire (PDRQ-9) provides a brief measure of the therapeutic aspects of the PDR in primary care. We assessed the internal and external validity of the German version of the PDRQ-9 in a representative cross-sectional German population survey that included 2,275 persons aged≥14 years who reported consulting with a primary care physician (PCP). The acceptance of the German version of this questionnaire was good. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the PRDQ-9 was unidimensional. The internal reliability (Cronbach's α) of the total score was .95. The corrected item-total correlations were≥.94. The mean satisfaction index of persons with a probable depressive disorder was lower than that of persons without a probable depressive disorder, indicating good discriminative concurrent criterion validity. The correlation coefficient between satisfaction with PDR and satisfaction with pain therapy was r = .51 in 489 persons who reported chronic pain, indicating good convergent validity. Despite the limitation of low variance in the PDRQ-9 total scores, the results indicate that the German version of the PDRQ-9 is a brief questionnaire with good psychometric properties to assess German patients' perceived therapeutic alliance with PCPs in public health research.
    PLoS ONE 01/2014; 9(3):e91964. · 3.73 Impact Factor

Full-text (3 Sources)

View
193 Downloads
Available from
May 22, 2014