Male hosts are responsible for the transmission of a trophically transmitted parasite, Pterygodermatites peromysci, to the intermediate host in the absence of sex-biased infection.

Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Department of Biology, 208 Mueller Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
International journal for parasitology (Impact Factor: 3.39). 05/2009; 39(11):1263-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.03.007
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Field studies have identified that male-biased infection can lead to increased rates of transmission, so we examined the relative importance of host sex on the transmission of a trophically transmitted parasite (Pterygodermatites peromysci) where there is no sex-biased infection. We experimentally reduced infection levels in either male or female white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) on independent trapping grids with an anthelmintic and recorded subsequent infection levels in the intermediate host, the camel cricket (Ceuthophilus pallidipes). We found that anthelmintic treatment significantly reduced the prevalence of infection among crickets in both treatment groups compared with the control, and at a rate proportional to the number of mice de-wormed, indicating prevalence was not affected by the sex of the shedding definitive host. In contrast, parasite abundance in crickets was higher on the grids where females were treated compared with the grids where males were treated. These findings indicate that male hosts contribute disproportionately more infective stages to the environment and may therefore be responsible for the majority of parasite transmission even when there is no discernable sex-biased infection. We also investigated whether variation in nematode length between male and female hosts could account for this male-biased infectivity, but found no evidence to support that hypothesis.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Male-bias in parasite infection exists in a variety of host – parasite systems, but the epidemiological importance of males and, specifi cally, whether males are responsible for producing a disproportionate amount of onward transmission events (male- biased transmission) has seldom been tested. Th e primary goal of our study was to experimentally test for male-biased transmission in a system with no sex-biased prevalence. We performed a longitudinal fi eld experiment and continuously removed intestinal nematode parasites from either male or female white-footed mice and recorded the subsequent transmis- sion among the untreated sex. We predicted males are responsible for the majority of transmission and female mice would have lower infection prevalence under the male-anthelmintic treatment than controls and that male mice would experience little or no change in infection prevalence under female-anthelmintic treatment compared to controls. Our second goal was to evaluate physiological hypotheses relating to the mechanisms that could generate the observed transmission pattern. To that end, we examined a cross-sectional sample of hosts to explicitly test for diff erences in parasite intensity, parasite egg shedding rate and reproductive output per parasite between male and female hosts. Removing parasites from male mice resulted in lower infection rates among female mice but, in contrast, there was no eff ect of female-deworming on infection rates among male mice; providing evidence that males provide disproportionately greater numbers of transmission events than females. We found no diff erence in prevalence, intensity, or fecundity of parasites between sexes in the cross-sectional sample of mice and rejected the mechanistic hypotheses. Without male-biased prevalence, intensity, or parasite fecundity, we concluded that male-biased transmission is unlikely to be created via physiological diff erences and the parsimonious explanation is that male behavior spreads infective stages in a more successful manner. We demonstrate that transmission heterogeneities can exist in the absence of individual heterogeneities in infection.
    Oikos 09/2012; 121(9):1446-1453. DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20358.x · 3.56 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many parasites with complex life cycles are known to modify their host phenotype to enhance transmission from the intermediate host to the definitive host. Several earlier studies explored these effects in acanthocephalan and trematode parasites, especially in aquatic ecosystems; however, much less is known about parasite‐mediated alterations of host behavior in terrestrial systems involving nematodes. Here, we address this gap by investigating a trophically transmitted nematode (Pterygodermatites peromysci) that uses a camel cricket (Ceuthophilus pallidipes) as the intermediate host before transmission to the final host, the white‐footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus). In a laboratory experiment, we quantified the anti‐predatory responses of the cricket intermediate host using simulated predator cues. Results showed a decrease in jumping performance among infected crickets as compared with uninfected crickets, specifically in terms of frequency of jumps and jumping distance. Additionally, the relationship between parasite load and frequency of jumps is negatively correlated with the intensity of infection. These behavioral modifications are likely to increase vulnerability to predation by the definitive host. An analysis of the age‐intensity pattern of infection in natural cricket populations appears to support this hypothesis: parasites accumulate with age, peak at an intermediate age class before the intensity of infection decreases in older age groups. We suggest that older, heavily infected crickets are preferentially removed from the population by predators because of increased vulnerability. These results show that cricket intermediate hosts infected with P. peromysci have diminished jumping performance, which is likely to impair their anti‐predatory behavior and potentially facilitate parasite transmission.
    Ethology 11/2011; 117(11):1019-1026. DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2011.01951.x · 1.56 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: SUMMARY We investigated offspring quality in fleas (Xenopsylla ramesis) feeding on non-reproducing, pregnant or lactating rodents (Meriones crassus) and asked whether (a) quality of flea offspring differs dependent on host reproductive status; (b) fleas trade off offspring quantity for quality; and (c) quality variables are inter-correlated. Emergence success was highest when parents exploited pregnant hosts, while development time was longest when parents exploited lactating hosts. Male offspring from fleas fed on non-reproductive and pregnant hosts were larger than those from lactating hosts whereas female offspring from fleas fed on pregnant hosts were larger than those from both lactating and non-reproductive hosts. Male offspring survived under starvation the longest when their parents exploited lactating hosts and the shortest when their parents exploited pregnant hosts. Female offspring of parents that exploited lactating hosts survived under starvation longer than those that exploited non-reproductive and pregnant hosts. Emergence success and development time decreased as mean number of eggs laid by mothers increased. Fleas that were larger and took longer to develop lived significantly longer under starvation. These results indicate the presence of a trade-off between offspring quantity and quality in fleas exploiting female Sundevall's jird in varying reproductive condition but this trade-off depended on the quality trait considered.
    Parasitology 02/2014; 141(7):1-11. DOI:10.1017/S0031182014000109 · 2.36 Impact Factor


Available from
Jun 30, 2014