Article

Molecular phylogenetics and generic assessment in the tribe Morindeae (Rubiaceae-Rubioideae): how to circumscribe Morinda L. to be monophyletic?

Bergius Foundation, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences and Botany Department, Stockholm University, SE-10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (Impact Factor: 4.07). 05/2009; 52(3):879-86. DOI:10.1016/j.ympev.2009.04.007
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Most of the species of the family Rubiaceae with flowers arranged in head inflorescences are currently classified in three distantly related tribes, Naucleeae (subfamily Cinchonoideae) and Morindeae and Schradereae (subfamily Rubioideae). Within Morindeae the type genus Morinda is traditionally and currently circumscribed based on its head inflorescences and syncarpous fruits (syncarps). These characters are also present in some members of its allied genera, raising doubts about the monophyly of Morinda. We perform Bayesian phylogenetic analyses using combined nrETS/nrITS/trnT-F data for 67 Morindeae taxa and five outgroups from the closely related tribes Mitchelleae and Gaertnereae to rigorously test the monophyly of Morinda as currently delimited and assess the phylogenetic value of head inflorescences and syncarps in Morinda and Morindeae and to evaluate generic relationships and limits in Morindeae. Our analyses demonstrate that head inflorescences and syncarps in Morinda and Morindeae are evolutionarily labile. Morinda is highly paraphyletic, unless the genera Coelospermum, Gynochthodes, Pogonolobus, and Sarcopygme are also included. Morindeae comprises four well-supported and morphologically distinct major lineages: Appunia clade, Morinda clade (including Sarcopygme and the lectotype M. royoc), Coelospermum clade (containing Pogonolobus and Morinda reticulata), and Gynochthodes-Morinda clade. Four possible alternatives for revising generic boundaries are presented to establish monophyletic units. We favor the recognition of the four major lineages of Morindeae as separate genera, because this classification reflects the occurrence of a considerable morphological diversity in the tribe and the phylogenetic and taxonomic distinctness of its newly delimited genera.

0 0
 · 
3 Bookmarks
 · 
99 Views
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Changements nomenclaturaux et notes taxonomiques dans la tribu Morindeae (Rubiaceae). Une nouvelle circonscription et de nouvelles délimitations génériques de la tribu des Morindeae dans la sous-famille des Rubioideae (Rubiaceae) ont été proposées à la suite de deux récentes études phylogénétiques moléculaires. L'adoption d'une circonscription étroite de Morinda et d'une circonscription large de Gynochthodes nécessite de nouvelles combinaisons et de nouveaux noms dans ces genres. Cette étude présente des descriptions de Gynochthodes et Morinda nouvellement délimités et 78 nouvelles combinations (73 chez le premier et cinq chez le second) et trois nouveaux noms (Gynochthodes alejandroi Razafim. & B.Bremer, G. ridsdalei Razafim. & B.Bremer et G. wongii Razafim. & B.Bremer). Nous établissons trois lectotypifications et reconnaissons 15 espèces chez Appunia, 11 espèces chez Coelospermum, 93 espèces chez Gynochthodes, 39 espèces chez Morinda et une espèce chez Siphonandrium. Enfin, une liste de toutes les espèces actuellement reconnues pour chaque genre des Morindeae est présentée.
    Adansonia 12/2011; · 0.64 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: During angiosperm evolution, innovations in vegetative and reproductive organs have resulted in tremendous morphological diversity, which has played a crucial role in the ecological success of flowering plants. Morindeae (Rubiaceae) display considerable diversity in growth form, inflorescence architecture, flower size, and fruit type. Lianescent habit, head inflorescence, small flower, and multiple fruit are the predominant states, but arborescent habit, non-headed inflorescence, large flower, and simple fruit states occur in various genera. This makes Morindeae an ideal model for exploring the evolutionary appearances and transitions between the states of these characters. We reconstructed ancestral states for these four traits using a bayesian approach and combined nuclear/chloroplast data for 61 Morindeae species. The aim was to test three hypotheses: 1) self-supporting habit is generally ancestral in clades comprising both lianescent and arborescent species; 2) changes from lianescent to arborescent habit are uncommon due to "a high degree of specialization and developmental burden"; 3) head inflorescences and multiple fruits in Morindeae evolved from non-headed inflorescences and simple fruits, respectively. Lianescent habit, head inflorescence, large flower, and multiple fruit are inferred for Morindeae, making arborescent habit, non-headed inflorescence, small flower, and simple fruit derived within the tribe. The rate of change from lianescent to arborescent habit is much higher than the reverse change. Therefore, evolutionary changes between lianescent and arborescent forms can be reversible, and their frequency and trends vary between groups. Moreover, these changes are partly attributed to a scarcity of host trees for climbing plants in more open habitats. Changes from large to small flowers might have been driven by shifts to pollinators with progressively shorter proboscis, which are associated with shifts in breeding systems towards dioecy. A single origin of dioecy from hermaphroditism is supported. Finally, we report evolutionary changes from headed to non-headed inflorescences and multiple to simple fruits.
    PLoS ONE 01/2012; 7(7):e40851. · 3.73 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 01/2013; 171:395-412. · 2.59 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
75 Downloads
Available from
May 13, 2013