Article

Primate Vocalization, Gesture, and the Evolution of Human Language

University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2520, USA.
Current Anthropology (Impact Factor: 2.93). 01/2009; 49(6):1053-63; discussion 1063-76. DOI: 10.1086/593015
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The performance of language is multimodal, not confined to speech. Review of monkey and ape communication demonstrates greater flexibility in the use of hands and body than for vocalization. Nonetheless, the gestural repertoire of any group of nonhuman primates is small compared with the vocabulary of any human language and thus, presumably, of the transitional form called protolanguage. We argue that it was the coupling of gestural communication with enhanced capacities for imitation that made possible the emergence of protosign to provide essential scaffolding for protospeech in the evolution of protolanguage. Similarly, we argue against a direct evolutionary path from nonhuman primate vocalization to human speech. The analysis refines aspects of the mirror system hypothesis on the role of the primate brain's mirror system for manual action in evolution of the human language-ready brain.

Full-text

Available from: Michael A Arbib, Jun 11, 2015
2 Followers
 · 
304 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The target article proposes a theory uniting the anthropological study of kin terminology with recent developments in linguistics and cognitive science. The response to comments reaches two broad conclusions. First, the theory may be relevant to several current areas of research, including (a) the nature and scope of the regular, “grammatical” side of language, (b) the organization of different domains of conceptual structure, including parallels across domains, their taxonomic distribution and implications for evolution, and (c) the influence of conceptual structure on social structure. Second, the theory compares favorably with alternatives, including (a) the theory that kin terminology is not really that complicated, (b) the theory that kin terms mirror social categories, (c) componential analysis, and (d) kinship algebra. If further research in anthropology, linguistics, and other fields supports the theory, and confirms the psychological reality of proposed mechanisms, then kinship may emerge as a model system for the study of important issues in cognition and social organization.
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences 09/2010; 33(05):404 - 416. DOI:10.1017/S0140525X1000275X · 14.96 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Speech is commonly claimed to relate to mirror neurons because of the alluring surface analogy of mirror neurons to the Motor Theory of speech perception, which posits that perception and production draw upon common motor-articulatory representations. We argue that the analogy fails and highlight examples of systems-level developmental approaches that have been more fruitful in revealing perception-production associations.
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences 04/2014; 37(2):204-5. DOI:10.1017/S0140525X13002331 · 14.96 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Positive and negative reinforcers guide our behaviors as we interact with others in our social environment. Here, we present evidence that highlights a central role for reward in the general functioning of the mirror neuron system (MNS). We also discuss the relevance of reward-related modulation on other previous findings revealing certain properties of the MNS, and on social context and psychopathology.
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences 04/2014; 37(2):196-7. DOI:10.1017/S0140525X13002240 · 14.96 Impact Factor