Article

Unconventional Superconductivity and Nearly Ferromagnetic Spin Fluctuations in NaxCoO2\cdotyH2O

• E. Takayama-Muromachi
Journal of the Physical Society of Japan (Impact Factor: 2.09). 01/2003; 72(12):3041-3044. DOI: 10.1143/JPSJ.72.3041
Source: arXiv

ABSTRACT Co nuclear-quadrupole-resonance (NQR) studies were performed in the recently discovered superconductor NaxCoO2\cdotyH2O to investigate physical properties in the superconducting (SC) and normal states. Two samples from the same NaxCoO2 were examined, a SC bilayer-hydrate sample with Tc ˜ 4.7 K and a non-SC monolayer-hydrate sample. From the measurement of nuclear-spin lattice relaxation rate 1/T1 in the SC sample, it was found that the coherence peak is absent just below Tc and that 1/T1 is proportional to temperature far below Tc. These results, which are in qualitative agreement with the previous result by Fujimoto et al., suggest strongly that unconventional superconductivity is realized in this compound. In the normal state, 1/T_1T of the SC sample shows a gradual increase below 100 K down to Tc, whereas 1/T_1T of the non-SC sample shows the Korringa behavior in this temperature range. From the comparison between 1/T_1T and chibulk in the SC sample, the increase in 1/T_1T is attributed to nearly ferromagnetic fluctuations. These remarkable findings suggest that the SC sample possesses nearly ferromagnetic fluctuations, which are possibly related to the unconventional superconductivity in this compound. The implication of this finding is discussed.

0 Bookmarks
·
59 Views
• Article: Nodal $d+id$ pairing and topological phases on the triangular lattice: unconventional superconducting state of Na$_x$CoO$_2\cdot y$H$_2$O
[Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We show that finite angular momentum pairing chiral superconductors on the triangular lattice have point zeroes in the complex gap function. A topological quantum phase transition takes place through a nodal superconducting state at a specific carrier density $x_c$ where the normal state Fermi surface crosses the isolated zeros. For spin singlet pairing, we show that the second nearest neighbor $d+id$-wave pairing can be the dominant pairing channel. The gapless critical state at $x_c\simeq0.25$ has six Dirac points and is topologically nontrivial with a $T^3$ spin relaxation rate below $T_c$. This picture provides a possible explanation for the unconventional superconducting state of Na$_x$CoO$_2\cdot y$H$_2$O. Analyzing a pairing model with strong correlation using the Gutzwiller projection and symmetry arguments, we study these topological phases and phase transitions as a function of Na doping.
12/2007;
• Source
Article: 59Co Nuclear Quadrupole Resonance Studies of Superconducting and Nonsuperconducting Bilayer Water Intercalated Sodium Cobalt Oxides NaxCoO2\cdotyH2O
[Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We report 59Co nuclear quadrupole resonance (NQR) studies of bilayer water intercalated sodium cobalt oxides NaxCoO2\cdotyH2O (BLH) with the superconducting transition temperatures, 2 K < Tc ≤ 4.6 K, as well as a magnetic BLH sample without superconductivity. We obtained a magnetic phase diagram of Tc and the magnetic ordering temperature TM against the peak frequency ν3 of the 59Co NQR transition Iz = ± 5/2 ≤ftrightarrow ± 7/2 and found a dome-shaped superconducting phase. The 59Co NQR spectrum of the nonsuperconducting BLH shows a broadening below TM without the critical divergence of 1/T1 or 1/T2, suggesting an unconventional magnetic ordering. The degree of enhancement of 1/T1T at low temperatures increases with the increase of ν3 though the optimal ν3 of approximately 12.30 MHz. In the NaxCoO2\cdotyH2O system, the optimal-Tc superconductivity emerges close to the magnetic instability. Tc is suppressed near the phase boundary at ν3 ˜ 12.50 MHz, which is not a conventional magnetic quantum critical point.
Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 06/2006; 75(6):3701-. · 2.09 Impact Factor
• Article: Spin fluctuations and 3D itinerant magnetism in NaxCoO2: Slave-boson mean-field study
physica status solidi (b) 06/2012; 249(6):1292-1297. · 1.49 Impact Factor