Unconventional Superconductivity and Nearly Ferromagnetic Spin Fluctuations in NaxCoO2\cdotyH2O

Division of Chemistry, Kyoto University, Kioto, Kyōto, Japan
Journal of the Physical Society of Japan (Impact Factor: 1.48). 12/2003; 72(12):3041-3044. DOI: 10.1143/JPSJ.72.3041
Source: arXiv

ABSTRACT Co nuclear-quadrupole-resonance (NQR) studies were performed in the recently discovered superconductor NaxCoO2\cdotyH2O to investigate physical properties in the superconducting (SC) and normal states. Two samples from the same NaxCoO2 were examined, a SC bilayer-hydrate sample with Tc ˜ 4.7 K and a non-SC monolayer-hydrate sample. From the measurement of nuclear-spin lattice relaxation rate 1/T1 in the SC sample, it was found that the coherence peak is absent just below Tc and that 1/T1 is proportional to temperature far below Tc. These results, which are in qualitative agreement with the previous result by Fujimoto et al., suggest strongly that unconventional superconductivity is realized in this compound. In the normal state, 1/T_1T of the SC sample shows a gradual increase below 100 K down to Tc, whereas 1/T_1T of the non-SC sample shows the Korringa behavior in this temperature range. From the comparison between 1/T_1T and chibulk in the SC sample, the increase in 1/T_1T is attributed to nearly ferromagnetic fluctuations. These remarkable findings suggest that the SC sample possesses nearly ferromagnetic fluctuations, which are possibly related to the unconventional superconductivity in this compound. The implication of this finding is discussed.


Available from: Hiroya Sakurai, Jun 13, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Single crystals of Na0.495CoO2 were obtained through a flux method followed by de-intercalation of sodium. The resistivity (ρ) and thermal stability were studied for the de-intercalated samples exposed to humid air. It was found that the de-intercalated Na0.495CoO2 crystal is vulnerable to water in the air, and a hydration process in which H2O molecules fill oxygen vacancies in CoO2 layers instead of being intercalated between CoO2 layers is suggested to be responsible for the remarkable change in resistivity induced by water absorption. The Na0.495CoO2 sample shows a weak localization of carriers just below 200 K and Co3+-Co4+ charge ordering at about 40 K, lower than the corresponding charge ordering transition temperature reported in Na0.5CoO2. The lower charge ordering transition temperature might be caused by the slight deviation of Na content (x) from 0.5.
    International Journal of Modern Physics B 09/2006; 20(23):3365-3372. DOI:10.1142/S0217979206035485 · 0.46 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Five samples of NaxCoO2 · yH2O were prepared and characterized carefully by X-ray diffraction, inductive-coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy, and redox titration, and their magnetic properties were elucidated. Anomalous behavior caused by a certain magnetic order was observed in magnetic susceptibilities of two samples instead of superconductivity. This result strongly suggests that a magnetically ordered phase exists adjacent to the superconducting phase and that superconductivity of the system is caused by the magnetic fluctuation. The presence of the magnetic phase is not consistent with a c/a–TC phase diagram proposed previously, suggesting that other parameters should be considered to draw the phase diagram. The phase diagram and the magnetic state of the non-superconducting phase are discussed.
    Physica C Superconductivity 10/2005; s 426–431:225–229. DOI:10.1016/j.physc.2004.12.017 · 1.11 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Motivated by superconductivity in the newly discovered Co-based oxide, we study a single-band extended Hubbard model on a triangular lattice within the random phase approximation. We show that f-wave triplet superconductivity is stabilized in the vicinity of charge–density–wave instability. The physical origin of the realization of the f-wave triplet state is discussed.
    Physica B Condensed Matter 04/2005; 359:591-593. DOI:10.1016/j.physb.2005.01.160 · 1.28 Impact Factor