The Lower-Extremity Allen Test
New York University Langone Medical Center, Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, New York, New York 10016, USA.Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery (Impact Factor: 1.31). 05/2009; 25(7):399-403. DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1220861
The Allen test is used to diagnose the relative contribution of the ulnar and radial arteries to each hand. We modified this test to investigate the relative vascular contributions to distal perfusion of the lower extremity. With the patient supine, a handheld Doppler is used to locate the first dorsal metatarsal artery. The posterior tibial artery (PT) and dorsalis pedis artery (DP) pulses are compressed. A persistent signal indicates collateral flow through the peroneal artery (PA). Sequential decompression is then used to evaluate the relative contribution of the PT and DP to distal circulation. We report a case in which angiography failed to predict reliance on the PT. In this case, performance of the lower-extremity Allen test (LEAT) led to an alternative recipient vessel choice. The LEAT is simple to perform and provides a valuable adjunct to angiographic data.
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Management of severe traumatic lower extremity injuries remains a considerable challenge. Free tissue transfer is now a standard part of reconstruction for Gustilo IIIB and IIIC injuries. There is limited information on arterial injury patterns in this population. We undertook a review of our experience to gain insight on vascular injury patterns and surgical outcomes. A 26-year retrospective analysis was performed of all lower extremity Gustilo IIIB and IIIC injuries requiring microvascular reconstruction at New York University Medical Center. Patient demographics, Gustilo classification, angiographic findings (conventional/computed tomographic angiography/magnetic resonance angiography), recipient vessels, elapsed time from injury, flap choices, and outcomes were examined. Two hundred twenty-two free flaps on 191 patients were performed from September 1982 until March 2008. There were 151 males and 40 females ranging in age from 4 to 83 years (median age 33 years). Patients sustained either Gustilo IIIB (170 patients) or IIIC (21 patients) open fractures. One hundred fifty-four patients had angiograms (78.2% IIIB, 100% IIIC). Sixty-six (42.9%) had normal 3-vessel runoff and 88 (57.1%) were abnormal. Sixty-one patients (31.9%) had anterior tibial injuries, 17 patients (8.9%) had posterior tibial injuries, and 30 (15.7%) had peroneal injuries. Sixty-three complications occurred (11 early thrombosis, 33 requiring secondary procedures, and 10 requiring amputation). Angiography of severe lower extremity injuries requiring free flap reconstruction usually revealed arterial injury and is generally indicated. In our experience, the anterior tibial artery is most commonly injured and the posterior tibial artery is most likely to be spared and used as a recipient.Journal of the American College of Surgeons 01/2010; 210(1):66-72. DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.040 · 5.12 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: True aneurysm of the dorsalis pedis artery is rare. To our best knowledge, only 19 cases have been reported in the literature with one case of bilateral involvement. We describe an unusual case of simultaneous, bilateral true aneurysms of the dorsalis pedis arteries due to chronic mild trauma from dorsally positioned sandal straps with secondary atherosclerotic change. This is the first such case reported. Symptomatic aneurysms are at risk for thrombosis or embolization, and surgical management is recommended. In our case, both aneurysms were resected and repaired with interposition graft of saphenous vein. The patient was symptom free at 6-month follow-up.Journal of Vascular Surgery 01/2013; 57(5). DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.066 · 3.02 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.