Occurence of non-melanoma skin cancers on the hands after UV nail light exposure

Departments of Dermatology and Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler, Unit 1452, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Archives of dermatology (Impact Factor: 4.79). 05/2009; 145(4):447-9. DOI: 10.1001/archdermatol.2008.622
Source: PubMed


Exposure to tanning beds, which contain mostly high-dose UV-A emitters, is a known cause of photoaging. Evidence is also accumulating for an association between tanning bed use and the development of skin cancer. Another source of high-dose UV-A is UV nail lights, available for use in the home and in beauty salons.
Two healthy middle-aged women with no personal or family history of skin cancer developed nonmelanoma skin cancers on the dorsum of their hands. Both women report previous exposure to UV nail lights.
It appears that exposure to UV nail lights is a risk factor for the development of skin cancer; however, this observation warrants further investigation. In addition, awareness of this possible association may help physicians identify more skin cancers and better educate their patients.

Full-text preview

Available from:
    • "Artificial nails are mostly done at nail salons and not at a dermatologist's office. Gel nails have been shunned by dermatologists because of the reported side effects, including dryness of nails, contact allergic dermatitis of surrounding skin, paronychia, brittleness, masking of underlying nail disorders and reported cases of non-melanoma skin cancer possibly associated with their use.[891011] On analysis, however, it can be seen that most of these side effects are technique dependent. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Gel nails are a commonly used cosmetic procedure, though their use by dermatologists has not been evaluated. These can be used to improve the appearance of cosmetically disfigured nails where other treatment options have failed; the condition is self-limiting or irreversible; or to camouflage the dystrophy until healing. A prospective, uncontrolled, open-label study on 25 participants presenting with cosmetically disfigured nails was undertaken. Mycologically negative, consenting patients with various nail plate surface abnormalities like trachyonychia (n =8); superficial pitting (n =6); onychorrhexis (n =4); superficial pitting with onychoschizia (n =3); Beau's lines (n =3) and pterygium (n =1) were included. The patients received gel nail application using Ranara gel nail kit(®). Extra care was taken to avoid any damage to cuticle. Standard pre- and post-treatment photographs were taken to assess improvement. Patient satisfaction score (1-10); Global assessment score of improvement (no improvement to excellent improvement) and any side effects reported were recorded. The average age of treated patients was 30.44±11.39 years (range 18-60 years). A total of 69 nails were treated (average of 2.76 per patient). Post-procedure, the average patient satisfaction score was 9.08 ± 0.86 (range 7-10). The Global assessment showed excellent improvement (40% cases); good improvement (56% cases) and mild improvement in the single case of pterygium treated. The use of Gel nails in patients with cosmetically disfiguring nail plate surface abnormalities (like trachyonychia, onychoschizia, pitting, etc.) was found to produce good to excellent improvement in most of the cases. The patient satisfaction with the procedure was rated as high. This, coupled with absence of side effects, make gel nails a valuable tool in improving cosmesis and satisfaction among patients presenting with nail plate surface abnormalities. Further studies with larger number of patients are required to assess the impact these prostheses can have.
    Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery 10/2014; 7(1):26-31. DOI:10.4103/0974-2077.129968
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The nail as an anatomic structure protects the terminal phalanx of the digit from injury. Historically, it has served as a tool for protection and for survival. As civilizations developed, it attained the additional function of adornment. Nail beautification is a big industry today, with various nail cosmetics available, ranging from nail hardeners, polishes, extensions, artificial/sculpted nails, and nail decorations. Adverse events may occur either during the nail-grooming procedure or as a reaction to the individual components of the nail cosmetics. This holds true for both the client and the nail technician. Typically, any of the procedures involves several steps and a series of products. Separate "nail-bars" have been set up dedicated to serve women and men interested in nail beautification. This article attempts to comprehensively inform and educate the dermatologist on the services offered, the products used, and the possible/potential adverse effects related to nail-grooming and nail cosmetics.
    Indian journal of dermatology, venereology and leprology 05/2012; 78(3):309-17. DOI:10.4103/0378-6323.95445 · 1.39 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background The use of ultraviolet (UV)A lamps for curing gel nails is widespread in the cosmetic nail industry. A report that two women who had undergone this treatment subsequently developed squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) on the dorsum of hands has prompted some concern about the safety of this procedure. Objectives To estimate the number of women who would need to be exposed to UVA nail lamps for one woman to develop SCC on the dorsum of hands, who would not have done so otherwise. Methods A mathematical model that combines age and UV exposure was used to compare the risk of developing SCC due to typical sun exposure with the risk of inducing these cancers from exposure to UVA nail lamps. Results For typical usage, the analysis indicates that tens or hundreds of thousands of women would need to use a UVA nail lamp regularly for one to go on to develop SCC on the dorsum of the hands as a direct consequence. Conclusions The risk of inducing an SCC from exposure to UVA nail lamps is very low and one that is likely to be accepted by most women. Even then, the risk can be reduced to virtually zero by wearing fingerless gloves when the hands are being exposed.
    British Journal of Dermatology 06/2012; 167(5). DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.11107.x · 4.28 Impact Factor
Show more