Relational trauma and the developing right brain: an interface of psychoanalytic self psychology and neuroscience

Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (Impact Factor: 4.31). 05/2009; 1159:189-203. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04474.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Psychoanalysis, the science of unconscious processes, has recently undergone a significant transformation. Self psychology, derived from the work of Heinz Kohut, represents perhaps the most important revision of Freud's theory as it has shifted its basic core concepts from an intrapsychic to a relational unconscious and from a cognitive ego to an emotion-processing self. As a result of a common interest in the essential, rapid, bodily based, affective processes that lie beneath conscious awareness, a productive dialogue is now occurring between psychoanalysis and neuroscience. Here I apply this interdisciplinary perspective to a deeper understanding of the nonconscious brain/mind/body mechanisms that lie at the core of self psychology. I offer a neuropsychoanalytic conception of the development and structuralization of the self, focusing on the experience-dependent maturation of the emotion-processing right brain in infancy. I then articulate an interdisciplinary model of attachment trauma and pathological dissociation, an early forming defense against overwhelming affect that is a cardinal feature of self-psychopathologies. I end with some thoughts on the mechanism of the psychotherapeutic change process and suggest that self psychology is, in essence, a psychology of the unique functions of the right brain and that a rapprochement between psychoanalysis and neuroscience is now at hand.

  • Source
    • "Psychoanalytic and relational therapists tend to feel the most uneasy about technology's presence because the idea of digital media conflicts more with underlying theories and trends. The current analytic focus on nonverbal communication that consists of gestures, facial expressions, and important moments of face-to-face affective regulation (Beebe and Lachmann 2003; Fonagy et al. 2002; Schore 2009; Stern 2004) renders cybertechnology a somewhat suspect form of communication. However, the recognition also exists that technology's sheer cultural popularity and widespread use all but guarantees its inevitable creep into the therapist's office (Brottman 2012; Hartman 2011; Mishna et al. 2012). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The increasing popularity of the Internet and social media has generated concerns and disputes about their effects on brain, behavior, and relationships. While many positive outcomes are associated with cybercommunication, some individuals experience negative consequences. This, in turn, has roused theoretical and clinical debates about the impact of technology on psychotherapy and the stances therapists should take in their own work with clients. Understanding the emerging digital culture, which includes how the Internet, social media, video games, reality, identity, relationships, and the self are experienced and managed, is thus important if clinicians are to carefully consider and understand the modern relevancy, patterns, and meanings of clients’ communications with and about technology, as well as the possible use of social media as a therapeutic tool. This paper considers those questions by evaluating research on the effects of technology use and the implications of that research for psychotherapeutic practice and theory, with a particular emphasis on how psychoanalytic therapists have approached the topic.
    Clinical Social Work Journal 06/2015; 43(2). DOI:10.1007/s10615-013-0461-2 · 0.27 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The interplay between top-down and bottom-up processes is however evident (Adcock et al., 2009; Silverstein et al., 2012). Many mechanisms investigated from various perspectives, support our hypothesis: disturbances of neural synchrony and reduced NMDA neurotransmission (Uhlhaas et al., 2008; Woo et al., 2010), dysconnectivity and plasticity (Stephan et al., 2009), changes in brain architecture involved in self-processes (Wylie and Tregellas, 2010; Guo et al., 2012), cognitive dissonance theory (Festinger, 1957; van Veen et al., 2009), aberrant salience (Kapur, 2003), social defeat hypothesis (Selten and Cantor-Grae, 2005), and psychodynamic theories in which is surmised that psychosis can be explained as an attempt to restore the defective 'self' (Kohut and Wolfe, 1978; Schore, 2009). Normal self-experience relies on a coherent percept. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this review is to describe the potential relationship between multisensory disintegration and self-disorders in schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Sensory processing impairments affecting multisensory integration have been demonstrated in schizophrenia. From a developmental perspective multisensory integration is considered to be crucial for normal self-experience. An impairment of multisensory integration is called 'perceptual incoherence'. We theorize that perceptual incoherence may evoke incoherent self-experiences including depersonalization, ambivalence, diminished sense of agency, and 'loosening of associations' between thoughts, feelings and actions that lie within the framework of 'self-disorders' as described by Sass and Parnas (2003). We postulate that subconscious attempts to restore perceptual coherence may induce hallucinations and delusions. Increased insight into mechanisms underlying 'self-disorders' may enhance our understanding of schizophrenia, improve recognition of early psychosis, and extend the range of therapeutic possibilities.
    Schizophrenia Research 08/2013; 152(1). DOI:10.1016/j.schres.2013.07.027 · 4.43 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Dissociation experiences involve detachment from the overwhelming emotional content of trauma. If dissociation is a conditioned way for affective regulation, it becomes automatized and habitual in response even to minor stressors interfering with the processing of emotional information, particularly negative ones (Frewen & Lanius, 2006 ; Oathes & Ray, 2008 ; Schore, 2009). For example, according to the cortico-limbic disconnection model (Sierra & Berrios, 1998), dissociation is a process that dampens affective reactivity to avoid emotional overstimulation (Sierra et al. 2002). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although some evidence suggests that borderline personality disorder (BPD) is primarily a disorder of the emotion regulation system, findings remain inconsistent. One potential explanation for this is the moderating role of dissociation. In this study, 33 female subjects with BPD and 26 healthy controls (HC; matched by education level and nicotine intake) were presented idiographic aversive, standard unpleasant and neutral scripts. Modulation of startle reflex and electrodermal responses (skin conductance level; SCL) were measured during imagery of emotional and neutral scripts. Additionally, self-reports of emotional experience (valence and arousal) and present-state dissociation were assessed. Patients with BPD showed elevated levels of dissociative experiences during testing. Present-state dissociation mediated group differences in SCL and startle response between the HC and BPD groups. These results suggest that careful attention must be paid to the moderating effect of dissociative symptoms on the psychophysiological responses of BPD patients. Furthermore, the findings have important implications for the assessment and treatment of BPD, including the need to carefully assess BPD patients for dissociative symptoms and to incorporate the treatment of dissociation.
    Psychological Medicine 11/2011; 42(4):783-94. DOI:10.1017/S0033291711001917 · 5.43 Impact Factor
Show more


Available from