Psychiatrists for medically complex patients: bringing value at the physical health and mental health/substance-use disorder interface.

Dept. of Internal Medicine and Psychiatry, Univ. of Minnesota, USA.
Psychosomatics (Impact Factor: 1.67). 03/2009; 50(2):93-107. DOI: 10.1176/appi.psy.50.2.93
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In their current configuration, traditional reactive consultation-liaison services see a small percentage of the general-hospital patients who could benefit from their care. These services are poorly reimbursed and bring limited value in terms of clinical improvement and reduction in health-service use.
The authors examine models of cross-disciplinary, integrated health services that have been shown to promote health and lower cost in medically-complex patients, those with complicated admixtures of physical, mental, social, and health-system difficulties.
Psychiatrists who specialize in the treatment of medically-complex patients must now consider a transition from traditional consultation to proactive, value-added programs and bill for services from medical, rather than behavioral, insurance dollars, since the majority of health-enhancement and cost-savings from these programs occur in the medical sector. The authors provide the clinical and financial arguments for such program-creation and the steps that can be taken as psychiatrists for medically-complex patients move to the next generation of interdisciplinary service.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Because a high percentage of primary care patients have behavioral problems, patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) that wish to attain true comprehensive whole-person care will find ways to integrate behavioral health services into their structure. Yet in today's health care environment, the incorporation of behavioral services into primary care is exceptional rather than usual practice. In this article, we discuss the components considered necessary to provide sustainable, value-added integrated behavioral health care in the PCMH. These components are to: (1) combine medical and behavioral benefits into one payment pool; (2) target complex patients for priority behavioral health care; (3) use proactive onsite behavioral "teams;" (4) match behavioral professional expertise to the need for treatment escalation inherent in stepped care; (5) define, measure, and systematically pursue desired outcomes; (6) apply evidence-based behavioral treatments; and (7) use cross-disciplinary care managers in assisting the most complicated and vulnerable. By adopting these 7 components, PCHMs will augment their ability to achieve improved health in their patients at lower cost in a setting that enhances ease of access to commonly needed services.
    The Annals of Family Medicine 03/2014; 12(2):172-5. · 4.57 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective We propose a patient care model involving psychiatrist-led multispecialty teams for treatment of the most treatment-refractory segment of “complex” outpatients. We call the psychiatrist taking this leadership role the Medical-Psychiatric Coordinating Physician (MPCP). Method The authors pilot tested this treatment model with 52 office-based outpatient cases involving complex patients, each with at least two major treatment failures. They followed these patients empirically for at least 18 months. Outcomes examined included Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A); Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D); and Health Related Quality of Life, modified (HRQOL-14) scores, in association with a comprehensive treatment review. Results Comprehensive treatment review indicated sustained improvement in at least two of four clinical dimensions (utilization, treatment adherence, symptomatology, quality of life) in 44 of 52 patients. Included were HAM-A scores that improved significantly from 26.27 ± 7.5 to 18.13 ± 5.74 (p<0.0001) and HAM-D scores that improved from 22.02 ± 7.10 to 14.58 ± 6.46 (p<0.0001). HRQOL-14 improved significantly for general health from 2.54 ±1.03 to 2.12 ± 1.06, (p<0.0001) and sick days/month 11.22 ± 7.76. to 6.60 ±7.51 ( p<0.0001). Conclusions The MPCP-led multispecialty team method may be advantageous for the ongoing outpatient treatment of management-intensive, complex patients. We offer this model as having a place among the available integrated care models for the treatment of comorbid psychiatric-systemic medical illness.
    Psychosomatics 07/2014; 55(4). · 1.67 Impact Factor


Available from
Jul 27, 2014