Article

Harvest surgical site infection following coronary artery bypass grafting: Risk factors, microbiology, and outcomes

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, St. John Hospital and Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA.
American journal of infection control (Impact Factor: 2.33). 05/2009; 37(8):653-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.12.012
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Our goals were to evaluate the risk factors predisposing to saphenous vein harvest surgical site infection (HSSI), the microbiology implicated, associated outcomes including 30-day mortality, and identify opportunities for prevention of infection.
All patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures from January 2000 through September 2004 were included. Data were collected on preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors, in addition to microbiology and outcomes.
Eighty-six of 3578 (2.4%) patients developed HSSI; 28 (32.6%) of them were classified as deep. The median time to detection was 17 (range, 4-51) days. An organism was identified in 64 (74.4%) cases; of them, a single pathogen was implicated in 50 (78%) cases. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently isolated pathogen: 19 (38% [methicillin-susceptible S aureus (MSSA) = 12, methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA) = 7]). Gram-negative organisms were recovered in 50% of cases, with Pseudomonas aeruginosa predominating in 11 (22%) because of a single pathogen. Multiple pathogens were identified in 14 (22%) cases. The 30-day mortality was not significantly different in patients with or without HSSI. Multivariate analysis showed age, diabetes mellitus, obesity, congestive heart failure, renal insufficiency, and duration of surgery to be associated with increased risk.
Diabetes mellitus, obesity, congestive heart failure, renal insufficiency, and duration of surgery were associated with increased risk for HSSI. S aureus was the most frequently isolated pathogen.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Mohamad G Fakih, Jan 01, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
119 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Surgical site infection (SSI) after saphenous vein graft harvesting is a complication occurring in up to 18% of patients who undergo coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). It is not known whether the method of skin closure influences the infection rate. To compare the rates of SSI and wound dehiscence of staples and sutures for skin closure after saphenous vein graft harvesting for CABG. We searched the following electronic databases: The Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 11/3/10); The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) - The Cochrane Library 2010 Issue 1; Ovid MEDLINE - 1950 to March Week 1 2010; Ovid MEDLINE - In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations (Searched 11/3/10); Ovid EMBASE - 1980 to 2010 Week 09 and EBSCO CINAHL - 1982 to March 11 2010. No date or language restrictions were applied. Trials comparing staples and sutures for closing leg wounds after vein graft harvesting in patients undergoing CABG were eligible for inclusion in this review. Two review authors independently assessed the titles and abstracts of references identified by the search strategy against the selection criteria and extracted data from eligible trials. Included trials were assessed for the following risks of bias: generation of random allocation sequence, allocation concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting and freedom from other biases. For dichotomous variables, we calculated the relative risk with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We included three prospective, randomised studies reporting on a total of 148 leg wounds closed with staples and 175 with sutures after vein graft harvesting in patients undergoing CABG. All trials were of sub-optimal methodological quality and all trials were at risk of bias. Leg wound infection rate was 10.8% (16/148) after leg wound closure with staples compared with 8% (14/174) with sutures (relative risk 1.20, 95% CI 0.60 to 2.39). Leg wound dehiscence occurred in 9.3% (10/108) of patients after leg wound closure with staples compared with 8.8% (12/137) with sutures (relative risk 1.05, 95%CI 0.43 to 2.53). These results suggest that there is no evidence of a difference in the risk of SSI and wound dehiscence when staples rather than sutures are used to close leg wounds after vein graft harvesting during CABG, however more research is needed.
    Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) 01/2010; DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD008057.pub2 · 5.94 Impact Factor
  • Source
    American journal of infection control 08/2010; 38(6):496-7. DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2010.02.003 · 2.33 Impact Factor
  • Source
    American journal of infection control 08/2010; 38(6):497-8. DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2009.09.007 · 2.33 Impact Factor