Article

The use of foam sclerotherapy for the treatment of head and neck vascular malformations

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (Impact Factor: 1.13). 05/2009; 47(8):631-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2009.03.007
Source: PubMed
1 Follower
 · 
106 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We have reviewed our experience (15 patients during the period 2008-2012) in the treatment of low flow vascular malformations (LFVMs) of the face and oral cavity with polidocanol foam sclerotherapy. They were diagnosed clinically and with the help of Doppler ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. The maximum dose recommended for each session was 20mg/day and the minimum interval between sessions was 4 weeks. Embolisation was repeated as many times as needed until the size of the lesions and the symptoms had been reduced sufficiently. Patients were followed up 1, 6, and 12 months after treatment had finished, and the size of the lesions was assessed objectively. The 8 men and 7 women were aged between 18 and 71 (mean 44) years. The lesions had reduced and symptoms had improved in all cases. During the follow-up period, one patient relapsed and developed further symptoms. The pain and postoperative inflammation were successfully controlled with an analgesic and an anti-inflammatory drug. There was only one complication (superficial necrosis), which healed completely by second intention. Direct puncture and sclerosis with polidocanol foam are an effective treatment for LFVM of the face and oral cavity.
    British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 05/2013; 52(1). DOI:10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.04.006 · 1.13 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this pilot study is to evaluate office-based sclerotherapy using sodium tetradecyl sulfate (STS) for epistaxis due to hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasias (HHT). Patients with HHT suffer from unpredictable, recurrent, severe nasal bleeding necessitating emergency care, nasal packing, blood transfusions, and invasive procedures. In this retrospective study 7 patients with a history of treatment for recurrent epistaxis due to HHT were treated in an office-based setting with intralesional injection of STS. Treatment results were evaluated using a questionnaire. All patients had undergone multiple prior procedures attempting to control epistaxis. Patients had an average of 5 sclerotherapy treatments for HHT. Patients were treated using topical and/or local anesthesia with no reports of discomfort. Bleeding requiring intervention did not occur during the procedures. After the procedure all patients (100%) reported significantly less frequent and less severe nasal bleeding. A total of 83% reported that their need for nasal packing was reduced. All patients were willing to undergo the same treatment again. No complications such as perforation, crusting, or foul smell were reported. This is the first clinical experience demonstrating that office-based sclerotherapy with STS is a safe, tolerable, and useful alternative for the treatment of epistaxis due to HHT.
    International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology 07/2011; 1(4):319-23. DOI:10.1002/alr.20053 · 2.37 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Our previous studies have demonstrated the tolerability and low side-effect profile of office-based sclerotherapy with sodium tetradecyl sulfate (STS) for treating recurrent epistaxis due to hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT). The objective of this study was to use a prospective randomized trial to determine the effectiveness of sclerotherapy with STS vs standard treatment.Methods This prospective randomized trial (conducted from November 1, 2011, through January 31, 2014) involved 17 patients with recurrent epistaxis due to HHT. We defined standard treatment as continuation of any treatment that the patient had previously undergone, such as moisturization, packing, and cautery. We used a crossover design, so study participants were randomized to either sclerotherapy or standard treatment during the first time period, and then to the other during the second period. The primary outcome measure was frequency and severity of epistaxis, as measured by the epistaxis severity score (ESS). The ESS is a 10-point scale, with higher scores corresponding to more bleeding.ResultsAfter controlling for treatment order, bleeding was substantially better controlled after sclerotherapy; the ESS after sclerotherapy was nearly one point lower than after standard treatment (−0.95, 1-sided p = 0.027). Treatment order, baseline ESS, the number of lesions, moisturization practices, and a history of previous blood transfusions did not significantly affect the results.Conclusion This trial demonstrated that sclerotherapy with STS (vs standard treatment) significantly reduced epistaxis due to HHT.
    International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology 02/2015; 5(5). DOI:10.1002/alr.21484 · 2.37 Impact Factor