Prevention and treatment of incontinence-associated dermatitis: literature review.

Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium.
Journal of Advanced Nursing (Impact Factor: 1.53). 05/2009; 65(6):1141-54. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.04986.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This paper is a report of a review conducted to describe the current evidence about the prevention and treatment of incontinence-associated dermatitis and to formulate recommendations for clinical practice and research.
Incontinence-associated dermatitis is a common problem in patients with incontinence. It is a daily challenge for healthcare professionals to maintain a healthy skin in patients with incontinence.
PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, reference lists and conference proceedings were explored up to September 2008.
Publications were included if they reported research on the prevention and treatment of incontinence-associated dermatitis. As little consensus about terminology was found, a very sensitive filter was developed. Study design was not used as a selection criterion due to the explorative character of the review and the scarce literature.
Thirty-six publications, dealing with 25 different studies, were included. The implementation of a structured perineal skin care programme including skin cleansing and the use of a moisturizer is suggested. A skin protectant is recommended for patients considered at risk of incontinence-associated dermatitis development. Perineal skin cleansers are preferable to using water and soap. Skin care is suggested after each incontinence episode, particularly if faeces are present. The quality of methods in the included studies was low.
Incontinence-associated dermatitis can be prevented and healed with timely and appropriate skin cleansing and skin protection. Prevention and treatment should also focus on a proper use of incontinence containment materials. Further research is required to evaluate the efficacy and effectiveness of various interventions.

0 0
1 Bookmark
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aims of this study were to measure skin moisture and transepidermal water loss after application of uncoated paper and to compare skin moisture and transepidermal water loss after use of uncoated paper and disposable underpads. The study was a cross-over, prospective, open-labeled, randomized trial. Bedridden patients agedā‰„18 years at a medical center in Korea were included. Treatment order was randomly assigned using block randomization, with a block size of 4 and an assignment rate of one-by-one. Skin moisture was measured using a Corneometer 825 and transepidermal water loss was measured using a Tewameter 300. Skin moisture after application of an uncoated paper was significantly lower than observed after application of a disposable underpad (mean 40.6 and SD 13.1 vs. mean 64.6 and SD 23.7, p<0.001). Transepidermal water loss also showed greater health scores after using uncoated paper (mean 11.1 and SD 5.7 g/m2/hour) than after applying a disposable underpad (mean 23.2 and SD 11.1 g/m2 /hour, p<0.001). There were no statistical between-group differences in room temperature, relative humidity, and body temperature. We found that uncoated paper was helpful in avoiding excessive moisture without adverse effects. As indicated by the results of this study, uncoated paper can be applied to bed-ridden patients who required incontinence care. Nurses may consider using uncoated paper as one of nursing methods in the routine care of bed-ridden patients for moisture control.
    Journal of Clinical Nursing 09/2012; 21(17-18):2469-76. · 1.32 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aging is associated with structural and functional changes of the skin that result in increased vulnerability. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesize empirical evidence about efficacy and effectiveness of basic skin care interventions to maintain skin integrity in the aged. The databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL (1990 to 2012), SCOPUS, SCI (February 2013), and reference lists were searched. Inclusion criteria were primary intervention studies using skin care products in physiologically aged skin (lower age limit 50 years). Study and sample characteristics, interventions, and outcomes were extracted. The methodological quality was assessed and a level of evidence was assigned. From 1534 screened articles 187 were read in full-text. From these 33 studies were included reporting results on treating dry skin conditions and on preventing incontinence-associated dermatitis and superficial ulcerations. Most studies had lower levels of evidence of 3 or 4. Skin cleansing products containing syndets or amphoteric surfactants compared to standard soap and water washing improved skin dryness and demonstrated skin protecting effects. Moisturizers containing humectants consistently showed statistically significant skin dryness improvements. Skin barrier products containing occlusives reduced the occurrence of skin injuries compared to standard or no treatment. Due to methodological limitations the current evidence base for basic skin care in the aged is weak. Using low-irritating cleansing products, humectant- or occlusives-containing moisturizers seem to be the best strategies to maintain the skin barrier function and integrity. We know little about the effects of cleansing regimens and about the benefits of moisturizers when compared to each other. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    British Journal of Dermatology 06/2013; · 3.76 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although this article is a stand-alone article, it sets the scene for later articles in this issue. Pressure ulcers are considered to be a largely preventable problem, and yet despite extensive training and the expenditure of a large amount of resources, they persist. This article reviews the current understanding of pressure ulcer aetiology: pressure, shear and microclimate. Individual risk factors for pressure ulceration also need to be understood in order to determine the level of risk of an individual. Such an assessment is essential to determine appropriate prevention strategies. The main prevention strategies in terms of reducing pressure and shear and managing microclimate are studied in this article. The problem of pressure ulceration related to medical devices is also considered as most of the standard prevention strategies are not effective in preventing this type of damage. Finally, the possibility of using dressings as an additional preventive strategy is raised along with the question: is there enough evidence to support their use?
    International Wound Journal 06/2013; · 1.60 Impact Factor