A generalized vortex lattice method for subsonic and supersonic flow applications

Source: NTRS

ABSTRACT If the discrete vortex lattice is considered as an approximation to the surface-distributed vorticity, then the concept of the generalized principal part of an integral yields a residual term to the vorticity-induced velocity field. The proper incorporation of this term to the velocity field generated by the discrete vortex lines renders the present vortex lattice method valid for supersonic flow. Special techniques for simulating nonzero thickness lifting surfaces and fusiform bodies with vortex lattice elements are included. Thickness effects of wing-like components are simulated by a double (biplanar) vortex lattice layer, and fusiform bodies are represented by a vortex grid arranged on a series of concentrical cylindrical surfaces. The analysis of sideslip effects by the subject method is described. Numerical considerations peculiar to the application of these techniques are also discussed. The method has been implemented in a digital computer code. A users manual is included along with a complete FORTRAN compilation, an executed case, and conversion programs for transforming input for the NASA wave drag program.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aeroelastic behavior of a supersonic rotating rectangular plate in the air medium is studied. For simulating the plate structure, the Mindlin first-order shear deformation plate theory along with Von Karman nonlinear terms is employed. Air dynamic pressure is modeled using first-order piston theory. The plate is placed inside a rigid baffle to remove shock waves generated by plate rotation and provide a uniform flow passing over the plate. Nonlinear dimensionless generalized equations of motion are presented based on the Kane dynamic method. After linearization of the nonlinear equations of motion, effect of different parameters including plate aspect ratio, thickness ratio, hub radius ratio and dimensionless rotation speed on aeroelastic behavior of the system are investigated. Frequency locking and high frequency flutter phenomenon are observed in the numerical results.
    International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 04/2011; 53(4):316-328. · 1.61 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of the present work is to evaluate the flying qualities of a half-scale radio controlled airplane based on the Unmanned Airplane for Ecological Conservation via flight simulation. The stability coefficients of the half-scale airplane were obtained by vortex lattice method using the code Tornado. The radio controlled aircraft simulator CRRCSim was used to perform the virtual flights. Aerodynamic, geometry, thrust and mass characteristics of the airplane were introduced to the simulator by a code written in C++. Virtual test flights were carried out and the flying qualities were obtained. It could be concluded that the half-scale airplane has excellent flying qualities, rating the aircraft in level 1. The simulator is recommended as a training tool for test pilots of the real model. Nomenclature C Lq , C Mq = variation of lift, and pitching moment coefficients with pitch rate C Lα , C Dα , C Mα = lift, drag, and pitching moment slopes C Lδe , C Mδe = variation of lift, and pitching moment coefficients with elevator deflection C ℓp , C np , C Yp = variation of rolling, yawing and side force coefficients with roll rate C ℓr , C nr , C Yr = variation of rolling, yawing and side force coefficients with yaw rate C ℓβ , C nβ , C Yβ = variation of rolling, yawing and side force coefficients with sideslip angle C ℓδr , C nδr , C Yδr = variation of rolling, yawing and side force coefficients with rudder angle C ℓδa , C nδa , C Yδa = variation of rolling, yawing and side force coefficients with aileron angle c = medium chord g x , g y , g z = components of gravity acceleration vector I x , I y , I z = rolling, pitching and yawing moments of inertia I xy , I yz , I zx = products of inertia moments about x-y, y-z and z-x axes L, M, N = rolling, pitching and yawing moments acting on the aircraft m = mass p, q, r = roll, pitch and yaw rate u, v, w = longitudinal, lateral and vertical components of velocity X, Y, Z = components of resultant aerodynamic forces acting on the airplane
    48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition; 01/2010
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract In this paper, we present a novel technique based upon artificial neural network (ANN), for applying aerodynamic pressure loads on the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for the purpose of carrying out finite element (FE) analysis during its structural design process. The objective of the work aims at carrying out one way fluid–solid interaction (FSI) for UAV structural design, in which aerodynamics loads obtained from Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis are applied on the vehicle structure for steady-state static FE analysis. CFD analysis of the UAV was performed using FLUENT® software. While, the FE analysis of the UAV was performed in ANSYS® software. As CFD and FE software employ different meshing schemes, thus pressure points coordinates obtained from CFD are not concurrent with the FE mesh. A methodology was, therefore, devised using artificial neural networks to generate pressure functions. In this method, aerodynamic pressure data was first sorted in terms of coordinates for different regions; a feed forward back propagation neural network model was then trained for each data set to generate approximate pressure functions in terms of coordinates. These pressure equations are subsequently used for applying pressure loads on the aircraft for strength and stiffness computation and internal layout design of the UAV structure. The work exhibits successful employment of ANN to match actual pressure profile on the aircraft. In comparison with conventional 3D regression techniques, this technique yielded very satisfactory and reliable results. It has been shown that this technique provided superior performance in comparison with 2D curve fitting employing higher order polynomials.
    Aerospace Science and Technology 01/2013; 30(1):210 - 225. · 0.87 Impact Factor


Available from