Article

Short- and long-term effects of feeding hydrolyzed protein infant formulas on growth at < or = 6 y of age: results from the German Infant Nutritional Intervention Study.

Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Epidemiology, Neuherberg, Germany.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (Impact Factor: 6.5). 05/2009; 89(6):1846-56. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.27373
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The short- and long-term effects of feeding with hydrolyzed formulas on growth are uncertain.
Our aim was to investigate the potential differences in body mass index (BMI) over the first 6 y of life between infants fed with partially hydrolyzed whey (pHF-W), extensively hydrolyzed whey (eHF-W), extensively hydrolyzed casein (eHF-C), or cow-milk formula (CMF) and infants exclusively breastfed for the first 16 wk of life.
We established a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of full-term neonates with atopic heredity in the German birth cohort followed by the German Infant Nutritional Intervention Study through the first 6 y of life. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses of absolute and World Health Organization-standardized BMI trajectories for 1840 infants (pHF-W: n = 253; eHF-W: n = 265; eHF-C: n = 250, CMF: n = 276; breastfed: n = 796) were performed.
No significant differences in absolute or World Health Organization-standardized BMI trajectories were found among the pHF-W, eHF-W, CMF, and breastfed groups during the 6-y follow-up. However, in the eHF-C group, both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses showed a significantly slower sex-adjusted BMI gain through the 8th to 48th week of life (-0.1 to -0.2 lower BMI z score) but not beyond. Analyses of weight and length revealed that this difference is due to a slightly diminished weight gain in the first year of life because growth in length did not differ among study groups for the entire follow-up.
To our knowledge, this is the first randomized trial investigating both short- and long-term effects of partially and extensively hydrolyzed formula (pHF-W, eHF-W, eHF-C), CMF, and breastfeeding on growth in one trial. Feeding with eHF-C led to a transient lower weight gain in the first year of life. No long-term consequences of different formulas on BMI were observed.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
162 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Infant formulas differ considerably in composition and sensory profiles. In this randomized study, we examined whether healthy infants fed an extensively protein hydrolysate formula (PHF) would differ in feeding behavior and growth from those fed cow-milk formula (CMF). Infants were randomly assigned to be fed CMF or PHF between 0.5 and 7.5 months of age. Each month for 7 months, infants were weighed and measured and then videotaped while being fed their assigned formula. Anthropometric z scores were calculated by using World Health Organization growth standards. Multilevel linear growth and piecewise mixed-effects models compared trajectories for growth measures and formula acceptance. When compared with infants fed CMF, infants fed PHF had significantly lower weight-for-length z scores across ages 2.5 to 7.5 months. There were no differences in length-for-age z scores, which indicate that group differences resulted from gains in weight, not length. Infants fed PHF also had significantly slower weight gain velocity compared with infants fed CMF. During the monthly assessments, PHF-fed infants consumed less formula to satiation than did CMF-fed infants across the study period. Maternal ratings of infants' acceptance of the formula did not differ at any age. z-score trajectories indicate that CMF-fed infants' weight gain was accelerated, whereas PHF-fed infants' weight gain was normative. Whether such differences in growth are because of differences in the protein content or amino acid profile of the formulas and, in turn, metabolism is unknown. Research on the long-term consequences of these early growth differences is needed.
    PEDIATRICS 01/2011; 127(1):110-8. · 4.47 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Zahlreiche chronische Erkrankungen in der Kindheit und im Erwachsenenalter haben ihren Ursprung in der perinatalen Entwicklungsphase und sind zudem möglicherweise transgenerational, epigenetisch beeinflusst. Daher tragen gerade prospektive Geburtskohorten maßgeblich zum Verständnis der Ätiologie von Erkrankungen bei und können veränderbare Risikofaktoren identifizieren. Die beiden populationsbasierten deutschen Geburtskohorten GINIplus und LISAplus verfolgen als Hauptziele den natürlichen Verlauf chronischer Erkrankungen im Kindesalter sowie intermediäre Phänotypen und Funktionseinschränkungen zu beschreiben, deren Determinanten zu analysieren und mögliche Effektmodifikationen durch genetische Polymorphismen zu identifizieren. Mitte der 1990er-Jahre wurden in vier Regionen Deutschlands 5991 (GINIplus) beziehungsweise 3097 (LISAplus) gesunde reife Neugeborene für ein Langzeit-Follow-up-Programm rekrutiert und bislang mit einer Response von etwa 55% über zehn Jahre hinweg beobachtet. Es wurden Wachstums- und Gewichtsentwicklung, Infektionskrankheiten und Allergien, seelische Gesundheit, Mundgesundheit, metabolische und inflammatorische Parameter teils im Längsschnitt auf potenzielle Risikofaktoren hin untersucht und der Einfluss genetischer Varianten analysiert. Ergebnisse dieser beiden Geburtskohorten haben den Wissensstand zum Verlauf häufiger Erkrankungen und intermediärer Phänotypen im Längsschnitt maßgeblich bereichert. Ergebnisse dieser Studien sind in zahlreiche internationale Projekte und Konsortien mit dem Ziel eingeflossen, deutsche Daten in den europäischen Kontext zu stellen und gemeinsam auszuwerten. Auf diese Weise wurde die Konsistenz der Ergebnisse untersucht und die Power für gemeinsame Analysen erhöht.
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz 01/2012; 55(6-7). · 0.72 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Diet in early infancy has an impact on early growth and the formation of flavour preferences, as well as on later life health outcomes. Although breast milk is the preferred source of nutrition during infancy, more than half of American infants receive infant formula by the age of 4 months. As a group, formula-fed infants weigh more by the age of one year and have a greater risk for later obesity than breastfed infants. However, a recent randomized study found that, when compared to breastfed infants, infants fed an extensively hydrolysed protein formula (ePHF) had more normative weight gain velocity than infants fed cow's milk formula (CMF). Therefore, grouping all formula-fed infants together with respect to certain health outcomes such as obesity may not be appropriate. Scientific evidence also suggests that there are sensitive periods for flavour learning. Infants become familiar with and learn to accept the flavours they experience through their mother's amniotic fluid and breast milk as well as formula. These early experiences influence flavour preferences of children that may affect food choices and therefore later life health. Further research on the influence of early diet on growth, flavour preferences, and food choices is imperative.
    International Review of Psychiatry 06/2012; 24(3):219-30. · 1.80 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
33 Downloads
Available from
Jun 1, 2014