Article

Predicting the outcome of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage using machine learning techniques.

Control, Learning, and Systems Optimization Group, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain.
IEEE transactions on information technology in biomedicine: a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (impact factor: 1.69). 05/2009; 13(5):794-801. DOI:10.1109/TITB.2009.2020434 pp.794-801
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Outcome prediction for subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) helps guide care and compare global management strategies. Logistic regression models for outcome prediction may be cumbersome to apply in clinical practice.
To use machine learning techniques to build a model of outcome prediction that makes the knowledge discovered from the data explicit and communicable to domain experts.
A derivation cohort (n = 441) of nonselected SAH cases was analyzed using different classification algorithms to generate decision trees and decision rules. Algorithms used were C4.5, fast decision tree learner, partial decision trees, repeated incremental pruning to produce error reduction, nearest neighbor with generalization, and ripple down rule learner. Outcome was dichotomized in favorable [Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) = I-II] and poor (GOS = III-V). An independent cohort (n = 193) was used for validation. An exploratory questionnaire was given to potential users (specialist doctors) to gather their opinion on the classifier and its usability in clinical routine.
The best classifier was obtained with the C4.5 algorithm. It uses only two attributes [World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) and Fisher's scale] and leads to a simple decision tree. The accuracy of the classifier [area under the ROC curve (AUC) = 0.84; confidence interval (CI) = 0.80-0.88] is similar to that obtained by a logistic regression model (AUC = 0.86; CI = 0.83-0.89) derived from the same data and is considered better fit for clinical use.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
34 Views

Keywords

classifier [area
 
confidence interval
 
data explicit
 
decision rules
 
decision trees
 
different classification algorithms
 
exploratory questionnaire
 
fast decision tree learner
 
favorable [Glasgow outcome scale
 
Fisher's scale]
 
global management strategies
 
incremental pruning
 
Neurological Surgeons
 
nonselected SAH cases
 
Outcome prediction
 
partial decision trees
 
ROC curve
 
rule learner
 
simple decision tree
 
two attributes [World Federation