Article

More information than you ever wanted: does Facebook bring out the green-eyed monster of jealousy?

Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Cyberpsychology & behavior: the impact of the Internet, multimedia and virtual reality on behavior and society (Impact Factor: 1.59). 05/2009; 12(4):441-4. DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2008.0263
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The social network site Facebook is a rapidly expanding phenomenon that is changing the nature of social relationships. Anecdotal evidence, including information described in the popular media, suggests that Facebook may be responsible for creating jealousy and suspicion in romantic relationships. The objectives of the present study were to explore the role of Facebook in the experience of jealousy and to determine if increased Facebook exposure predicts jealousy above and beyond personal and relationship factors. Three hundred eight undergraduate students completed an online survey that assessed demographic and personality factors and explored respondents' Facebook use. A hierarchical multiple regression analysis, controlling for individual, personality, and relationship factors, revealed that increased Facebook use significantly predicts Facebook-related jealousy. We argue that this effect may be the result of a feedback loop whereby using Facebook exposes people to often ambiguous information about their partner that they may not otherwise have access to and that this new information incites further Facebook use. Our study provides evidence of Facebook's unique contributions to the experience of jealousy in romantic relationships.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Emily Christofides, Jul 06, 2015
12 Followers
 · 
290 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent news in the media has suggested that younger people are using popular social media such as Facebook less and are quickly adopting newer media, such as the self-destructing app Snapchat. Snapchat is unique in that it erases messages several seconds after they have been sent, affording its users a higher level of privacy. Yet, little research exists on Snapchat use in general, let alone its broader psychological implications. This article offers a preliminary comparison of Snapchat and Facebook use and psychological effects on romantic jealousy. General motives for using Snapchat and Facebook are examined, as well as the nature of the content that Snapchat users most frequently share. Further, because of the differences in privacy and persistence of information, potential psychological effects in the domain of romantic jealousy are also examined, which has been widely studied on Facebook in the last few years. Findings show that the main difference in motives were that Snapchat was used more for flirting and finding new love interests, whereas Facebook was still the main social networking site used for keeping in touch with friends. Further, when presenting users with a series of potentially jealousy provoking scenarios, Snapchat elicited higher levels of jealousy than did Facebook. These findings are explained based on an affordance approach.
    Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 02/2015; 18(3). DOI:10.1089/cyber.2014.0479 · 2.18 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The studies about the impact of new technologies and social networks on adolescent dating relationships are still considered emerging, especially in Spain. This study analysed the quality of cyberdating among adolescents by means of a mixed study. In a first study two focus groups were developed with the aim of exploring the positive and negative aspects of Internet and social networks for dating relationships. The results of this study were the base for developing a scale of the quality of cyberdating: The cyberdating Q_A. The instrument was administered to 626 adolescents (average age 15.13; SD = 1.34; 51.4% males) and a cross-validation procedure was performed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Results confirmed a structure of six factors, namely online intimacy, emotional communication strategies, cyberdating practices, online control, online jealousy, and online intrusive behavior. Descriptive analysis showed that these scales were very frequent among adolescents, with boys scoring higher in intrusive behavior and cyberdating practices than girls. These results underlined the relevance of online activity in adolescent quality of dating relationships, so future research would benefit from considering an analysis of both overall and specific relationship quality measures in online settings by means of this new measure of cyberdating.
    Computers in Human Behavior 02/2015; 48:78-86. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.006 · 2.69 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A measure of Facebook-related mate-retention tactics was developed to investigate the relationship between online behaviors and intimate partner aggression. One hundred and seventy-seven young adults (65 men, 112 women) completed questionnaires that included measures of online and offline mate-retention tactics, Facebook jealousy, Facebook surveillance, and intimate partner violence. A factor analysis yielded four subscales for the Facebook Mate-Retention Tactic Inventory (FMRTI): Care and Affection, Jealousy and Surveillance, Possession Signals, and Punishment of Infidelity Threat. The FMRTI total scores were positively correlated with Facebook jealousy, Facebook surveillance, and use of offline mate-retention tactics. The Jealousy and Surveillance subscale uniquely predicted intimate partner psychological and physical aggression over and above existing measures. Facebook mate-retention tactics fully mediated the relation between Facebook jealousy and both intimate partner psychological and physical aggression. The current study provides preliminary evidence for conceptualizing Facebook as an environment for the use of mate-retention tactics that have real-life implications for intimate partner violence.
    Journal of Interpersonal Violence 10/2014; DOI:10.1177/0886260514554286 · 1.64 Impact Factor