Article

State-based differences in the prevalence and characteristics of untreated persons with serious psychological distress

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway N.E., Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
International Journal of Public Health (Impact Factor: 1.97). 05/2009; 54 Suppl 1:9-15. DOI: 10.1007/s00038-009-0001-6
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To examine the state-based prevalence of serious psychological distress (SPD) and its treatment using the Kessler-6 scale.
SPD and treatment data were obtained from 202,114 respondents in the 2007 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Mental Illness and Stigma Module in 35 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.
Approximately 4.0 % of persons in the 35 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico had SPD. The prevalence estimates ranged from 2.3 % in Iowa to 6.6 % in Mississippi. Among persons with SPD, 53.4 % were currently untreated, ranging from 33.3 % in Alaska to 67.0 % in Hawaii.
Mental health parity and a multidimensional approach to healthcare with extensive referrals between mental and physical healthcare is warranted.

1 Follower
 · 
66 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To examine the association between serious psychological distress (SPD) and the Physical and Mental Health components of Quality of Life (QOL) while controlling for depression in a national sample of adults with diabetes. Methods: SPD was assessed in 1,659 adults with diabetes who participated in the 2007 Medical Care Expenditure Survey (MEPS). SPD was measured by the 6-item Kessler scale. Depression was assessed with the PHQ-2 screen. Quality of life was measured with the physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) components of the SF-12. We used multiple linear regression to assess the relationship between SPD and quality of life while controlling for relevant covariates and depression screen results to assess the independent effect of SPD on QOL above and beyond the effect of depression. Results: Among US adults with diabetes, 9% had SPD and 15.4% screened positive for depression. Among those with SPD, 85.8% had depression and among those with depression, 50.5% had SPD. In the adjusted model for socio-demographic factors and comorbidities, SPD was significantly associated with lower PCS scores (-5.51 95% CI -7.55; -3.45) and MCS scores (-18.99 95% CI -20.81; -17.18). In the adjusted model that also controlled for depression, SPD was still significantly associated with lower PCS scores (-3.03 95% CI -5.63; -0.43) and MCS scores (-9.46 95% CI -11.67; -7.24). Conclusions: Among U.S. adults, SPD is associated with significantly diminished QOL above and beyond the effects of depression. Targeted interventions to mitigate the adverse effects of SPD are needed, independent of programs to address depression.
    The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine 01/2014; 48(2):135-46. DOI:10.2190/PM.48.2.f · 0.81 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: While there are state and national estimates of serious psychological distress (SPD), these are not useful for targeting local mental health interventions or for addressing the needs of sub-populations at increased risk for SPD. This cross-sectional study uses data from the population-based 2010 Health of Houston Survey (n = 5,116) to examine (1) the prevalence of SPD and its determinants in Houston area and (2) predictors of the utilization of mental health services among people with SPD. The prevalence of SPD among the Houston area adult population was 7 %, more than twice the national average. Correlates of SPD included: being female, under 65, lacking emotional support, smoking, having poor health status and financial distress. The odds of utilizing health services by those with SPD were affected by financial distress, insurance, employment and perceived need for services, among other factors. Interventions should be tailored to mitigate risk factors for SPD and to improve access to mental health services in the SPD sub-population.
    Community Mental Health Journal 12/2014; DOI:10.1007/s10597-014-9790-z · 1.03 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Psychological distress not only has substantial health and social consequences, but is also associated with emergency department (ED) use. Previous studies have typically used cross-sectional data to focus on the relation between serious psychological distress and dichotomized ED utilization measures, without assessing the volume of ED use or examining nonserious levels of psychological distress. The objective of this study was to explore the association between ED utilization volume and the full spectrum of psychological distress.
    Academic Emergency Medicine 05/2014; 21(5):510-519. DOI:10.1111/acem.12369 · 2.20 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
34 Downloads
Available from
May 21, 2014