After-School Program Impact on Physical Activity and Fitness. A Meta-Analysis

Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA.
American journal of preventive medicine (Impact Factor: 4.53). 04/2009; 36(6):527-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.033
Source: PubMed


The majority of children do not participate in sufficient amounts of daily, health-enhancing physical activity. One strategy to increase activity is to promote it within the after-school setting. Although promising, the effectiveness of this strategy is unclear. A systematic review was performed summarizing the research conducted to date regarding the effectiveness of after-school programs in increasing physical activity.
Databases, journals, and review articles were searched for articles published between 1980 and February 2008. Meta-analysis was conducted during July of 2008. Included articles had the following characteristics: findings specific to an after-school intervention in the school setting; subjects aged <or=18 years; an intervention component designed to promote physical activity; outcome measures of physical activity, related constructs, and/or physical fitness. Study outcomes were distilled into six domains: physical activity, physical fitness, body composition, blood lipids, psychosocial constructs, and sedentary activities. Effect sizes (Hedge's g) were calculated within and across studies for each domain, separately.
Of the 797 articles found, 13 unique articles describing findings from 11 after-school interventions were reviewed. Although physical activity was a primary component of all the tested interventions, only eight studies measured physical activity. From the six domains, positive effect sizes were demonstrated for physical activity (0.44 [95% CI=0.28-0.60]); physical fitness (0.16 [95% CI=0.01-0.30]); body composition (0.07 [95% CI=0.03-0.12]); and blood lipids (0.20 [95% CI=0.06-0.33]).
The limited evidence suggests that after-school programs can improve physical activity levels and other health-related aspects. Additional studies are required that provide greater attention to theoretical rationale, levels of implementation, and measures of physical activity within and outside the intervention.

Download full-text


Available from: Michael W Beets,
    • "Recent research has suggested this model may be an effective way to increase physical activity (reaching the goal of 60-minutes a day) and improve self-efficacy, self-esteem and self-worth (CDC, 2013; Centeio et al., 2014; Colchico et al., 2000; Erwin et al., 2013). After-school physical activity programmes in particular have shown promise as effective ways to increase physical activity (Beets et al., 2009; Neumark-Sztainer et al., 2003). However, little is known about the factors that lead students to voluntarily attend these after-school physical activity programmes, especially high-school students who represent the least active youth population (Broderson et al., 2006). "
    whalen · mcCaughtry · Garn · Kulik · Centeio · Maljak · Kaseta · Shen · Martin ·

    Health Education Journal 10/2015; DOI:10.1177/0017896915608885 · 0.73 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Recess and Physical Education (PE) are examples of organizational opportunities found to be related to PA during school hours (Guinhouya et al., 2009). Locations such as playgrounds (Quigg et al., 2010; Reed and Hooker, 2012) and urban green space (Lachowycz et al., 2012; Wheeler et al., 2010) or facilities such as sports facilities (Niclasen et al., 2012), school grounds (Dencker et al., 2012), clubs (after school programs in Denmark) (Beets et al., 2009), and shopping centres (Oreskovic et al., 2012) are all potential subdomains for PA during leisure time as they seem to be positively correlated with PA. Within the transport domain active and passive transport are two distinct PA behaviours (Heath et al., 2012). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study presents a novel method to assess context-specific physical activity patterns using accelerometer and GPS. The method efficiency is investigated by providing descriptive results on the use of domains and subdomains, and assessing how much of children's and adolescents' daily activity time can be classified by these domains and subdomains. Four domains and 11 subdomains were defined as important contexts for child and adolescent behaviour. During weekdays (n=367) and weekend days (n=178) the majority of children and adolescents spent time in active transport, urban green space, clubs and sports facilities. Satisfactory method efficiency was found during weekdays. Natural experiments combined with objective assessment of context-specific behaviours hold the potential to create evidence on the effects of changes to the built environment on behaviour. Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
    Health & Place 12/2014; 31C:90-99. DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.11.006 · 2.81 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Extra-curricular interventions, which use school facilitates (playground, gym etc.) but do not use core teaching time, provide an opportunity in which children could be more active [6]. A 2009 systematic review identified 13 papers reporting the results from 11 different after-school interventions, of which only one had included objective assessments of physical activity [8]. None of the studies were conducted in the United Kingdom [8]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Extracurricular programmes could provide a mechanism to increase the physical activity (PA) of primary-school-aged children. The aim of this feasibility study was to examine whether the Action 3:30 intervention, which is delivered by teaching assistants, holds promise as a means of increasing the PA of Year 5 and 6 children. A cluster randomised feasibility trial was conducted in 20 primary schools. Ten schools received the Action 3:30 intervention and 10 schools were allocated to the control arm. The intervention was 40 one-hour sessions, delivered twice a week by teaching assistants. The proportion of participants recruited per school was calculated. Session delivery and session attendance was calculated for intervention schools. Weekday and after-school (3.30 to 8.30 pm) moderate to vigorous intensity physical (MVPA) was assessed by accelerometer at baseline (T0), during the last few weeks of the intervention (T1) and four months after the intervention had ended (T2). The costs of delivering the intervention were estimated. Five intervention schools ran all 40 of the intended sessions. Of the remaining five, three ran 39, one ran 38 and one ran 29 sessions. Mean attendance was 53%. The adjusted difference in weekday MVPA at T1 was 4.3 minutes (95% CI −2.6 to 11.3). Sex-stratified analyses indicated that boys obtained 8.6 more minutes of weekday MVPA than the control group (95% CI 2.8 to 14.5) at T1 with no effect for girls (0.15 minutes, 95% CI −9.7 to 10.0). There was no evidence that participation in the programme increased MVPA once the club sessions ceased (T2). The indicative average cost of this intervention was £2,425 per school or £81 per participating child during its first year and £1,461 per school or £49 per participating child thereafter. The effect of the Action 3:30 intervention was comparable to previous physical activity interventions but further analysis indicated that there was a marked sex difference with a positive impact on boys and no evidence of an effect on girls. The Action 3:30 intervention holds considerable promise but more work is needed to enhance the effectiveness of the intervention, particularly for girls. Trial registration ISRCTN58502739
    International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 09/2014; 11(1):114. DOI:10.1186/s12966-014-0114-z · 4.11 Impact Factor
Show more