Article

A systematic review of continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome.

Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK.
Sleep Medicine Reviews (Impact Factor: 9.14). 05/2009; 13(6):427-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2009.02.004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We conducted a systematic review of current evidence on the effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome (OSAHS). The primary outcomes were subjective sleepiness, using Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and objective sleepiness using Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) and Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT). Mean difference (MD) in endpoints was used to compare CPAP to usual care, placebo and dental devices. The analysis was stratified by symptom and disease severity at baseline. CPAP significantly reduced ESS score compared to control (MD -2.7, 95% CI -3.45, -1.96). The benefit was greatest in patients whose symptoms were severe at baseline: severely symptomatic population (MD -5.0, -6.5, -3.5); moderate (MD -2.3, -3.0, -1.6); mild (MD -1.1, -1.8, -0.3). CPAP significantly improved MWT score compared to control (MD 3.3, 1.3, 5.3) but not on the MSLT. There was no statistically significant difference between CPAP and dental devices on the ESS, MWT or MSLT, in a population with moderate symptoms. There was some evidence of benefit for blood pressure with CPAP compared to control. CPAP is an effective treatment for OSAHS in moderate to severe symptomatic patients and there may be benefits for mild symptoms. Dental devices may be a treatment option for moderate symptoms.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
113 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: While continuous positive airway pressure is the first-line treatment for obstructive sleep apnea, many patients find this form of therapy undesirable leading to treatment nonadherence. Both mandibular advancement devices and surgical therapy offer alternative solutions for such patients. This article serves to compare the types of surgical interventions and mandibular advancement devices available, their mechanisms of action, and expected side effects. Emphasis is made on the limitations and challenges in the interpretation of the available literature due to the varying definitions of curative success. The effects of mandibular advancement devices and surgical therapy on the apnea-hypopnea index and oxygen saturation are reviewed. Patient-centered outcomes of sleepiness, quality of life, treatment preference, adherence, and their effects on disease-related outcomes of hypertension are summarized. When available, comparative effectiveness trials between these therapies versus continuous positive airway pressure are emphasized. Patient selection criteria, practice parameters, and treatment limitations are discussed.
    Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 10/2014; 35(5):613-20. DOI:10.1055/s-0034-1390047 · 2.75 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previous studies suggest that treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in patients with epilepsy can improve seizure control. We investigated the effect of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy on seizures in adults with epilepsy referred to the Cleveland Clinic for polysomnography (PSG) from 1997 to 2010. Seizure outcome at baseline and 1 year later was compared in patients with no OSA (apnea–hypopnea index [AHI] < 5), patients with PAP-treated OSA, and patients with untreated OSA. One hundred thirty-two subjects (age: 40.2 ± 13 (18–76) years, 65.4% female) were included. Seventy-six (57.6%) subjects had OSA; of these, 43 (56.6%) were on PAP therapy, and 33 (43.4%) were not on PAP therapy (either PAP-intolerant or refused therapy). Of the group with PAP-treated OSA, 83.7% were adherent (use ≥ 4 h/night at least 5 nights/week). The percentage of subjects with ≥ 50% seizure reduction and the mean percentage of seizure reduction were significantly greater in the group with PAP-treated OSA (73.9%; 58.5%) than in subjects with untreated OSA (14.3%; 17.0%). There were significantly more subjects with successful outcomes (with ≥ 50% seizure reduction or seizure-free at both baseline and follow-up) in the group with PAP-treated OSA (83.7%) than in the groups with no OSA (53.6%) and untreated OSA (39.4%). After adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, AHI, and epilepsy duration, we found that the odds of successful outcomes in subjects in the group with PAP-treated OSA were 9.9 and 3.91 times those of the groups with untreated OSA and no OSA, respectively. The group with PAP-treated OSA had 32.3 times the odds of having a ≥ 50% seizure reduction compared with the group with untreated OSA and 6.13 times compared with the group with no OSA. Positive airway pressure therapy appears to produce beneficial effects on seizures in adult patients with epilepsy and OSA.
    Epilepsy & Behavior 08/2014; 37:270–275. DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.07.005 · 2.06 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a chronic, highly prevalent, multisystem disease, which is still largely underdiagnosed. Its most prominent risk factors, obesity and older age, are on the rise, and its prevalence is expected to grow further. The last few years have seen an exponential increase in studies to determine the impact of OSA on the central nervous system. OSA-induced brain injury is now a recognized clinical entity, although its possible dual relationship with several other neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders is debated. The putative neuromechanisms behind some of the effects of OSA on the central nervous system are discussed in this review, focusing on the nocturnal intermittent hypoxia and sleep fragmentation.
    Current opinion in pulmonary medicine 09/2014; 20(6). DOI:10.1097/MCP.0000000000000099 · 2.96 Impact Factor