Article
Alemtuzumab as treatment of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease: results of a phase II study.
Hematology Department, Hematopoietic Transplantation Unit, Institute of Hematology and Oncology, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
Biology of blood and marrow transplantation: journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (impact factor:
3.15).
06/2009;
15(5):639-42.
DOI:10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.01.014
pp.639-42
Source: PubMed
-
Citations (0)
- Cited In (1)
-
Article: Consensus Conference on Clinical Practice in Chronic GVHD: Second-Line Treatment of Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease.
[show abstract] [hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Steroid refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is associated with a significant morbidity and mortality. Although first-line treatment of cGVHD is based on controlled trials, second-line treatment is almost solely based on phase II trials or retrospective analyses. The consensus conference on clinical practice in cGVHD held in Regensburg aimed to achieve a consensus on the current evidence of treatment options as well as to provide guidelines for daily clinical practice. Treatment modalities are the use of steroids and calcineurin inhibitors as well as immunomodulating modalities (photopheresis, mTOR-inhibitors, thalidomide, hydroxychloroquine, vitamin A analogs, clofazimine), and cytostatic agents (mycophenolate mofetil, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, pentostatin). Recent reports showed some efficacy of rituximab, alemtuzumab, and etanercept in selected patients. Moreover, tyrosine kinase inihibitors such as imatinib came into the field because of their ability to interfere with the platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF-R) pathway involved in fibrosis. An other treatment option is low-dose thoracoabdominal irradiation. Although different treatment options are available, the "trial-and-error system" remains the only way to identify the drug effective in the individual patient, and valid biomarkers are eagerly needed to identify the likelihood of response to a drug in advance. Moreover, the sparse evidence for most treatment entities indicates the urgent need for systematic evaluation of second-line treatment options in cGVHD.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation: journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation 01/2011; 17(1):1-17. · 3.15 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed.
The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual
current impact factor.
Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence
agreement may be applicable.
Keywords
10 patients
adult patients
aGVHD grade III
aGVHD grade IV
aGVHD progression
alemtuzumab treatment
alternative therapies
cell transplantation
complete response
dismal prognosis
efficacy
grade 3-4
infectious events
leukemia relapse
partial response
phase II trial
severe aGVHD
severe infection
steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease
steroid-refractory aGVHD