The overriding goal of reconstructive breast surgery is to satisfy the patient with respect to her own self-image and expectations. Ultimately, individualized selection of a reconstructive technique for each patient will be a predominant factor in achieving a reconstructive success. The authors reviewed their institutional experience with postmastectomy reconstruction over the past 2 years and discuss indications, contraindications, advantages, and disadvantages of autogenous tissue and prosthetic breast reconstruction.
"Options include transverse rectus abdominis musculocutanous (TRAM) flap reconstruction which uses abdominal fat to recreate the breast and latissimus dorsi which uses tissue from the back. Implant reconstruction is the simplest surgical procedure with a shorter recovery time and avoids donor site wounds and potential complications . TRAM flap reconstruction is considered to give the most natural texture and best symmetry. "
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: The overall aim of this study was to assess the accuracy, reproducibility and stability of a high resolution passive stereophotogrammetry system to image a female mannequin torso, to validate measurements made on the textured virtual surface compared with those obtained using manual techniques and to develop an approach to make objective measurements of the female breast. 3D surface imaging was carried out on a textured female torso and measurements made in accordance with the system of mammometrics. Linear errors in measurements were less than 0.5mm, system calibration produced errors of less than 1.0mm over 94% over the surface and intra-rater reliability measured by ICC=0.999. The mean difference between manual and digital curved surface distances was 1.36 mm with maximum and minimum differences of 3.15 mm and 0.02 mm, respectively. The stereophotogrammetry system has been demonstrated to perform accurately and reliably with specific reference to breast assessment.
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Postmastectomy irradiation often negatively impacts breast reconstruction outcomes. Further investigation is necessary to recognize factors contributing to adverse results. The purpose of this study was to (1) accurately assess the impact of radiation on autologous breast reconstruction and (2) identify patient and treatment factors affecting reconstructive outcomes.
One hundred twenty-six patients were considered after postmastectomy breast reconstruction and irradiation. The records of 76 patients were studied after excluding for radiation therapy before reconstruction, complications before irradiation, implant reconstruction, mastectomy for recurrent disease, and history of cancer. Patient demographics and comorbidities, operative details, adjuvant therapy, and treatment outcomes were assessed.
Seventy-six patients underwent autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction. Complications occurred in 53 patients (70 percent) 7.2 +/- 6 months after irradiation; 36 cases (47 percent) required reoperation for postirradiation effects. Parenchymal complications (fat necrosis or parenchymal fibrosis) were noted in 19.7 percent, skin complications (tissue envelope retraction or hypertrophic scarring) were recorded in 30.3 percent, and general dissatisfaction (physician or patient dissatisfaction) arose in 27.6 percent of patients. Parenchymal complications were associated with smoking (odds ratio, 9.3; p = 0.03), type II diabetes mellitus (odds ratio, 8.5; p = 0.02), and age (odds ratio, 1.1; p = 0.02). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy increased the development of complications (odds ratio, 4.4; p = 0.04), particularly skin changes (odds ratio, 2.4; p = 0.01).
Patient-specific factors, including diabetes mellitus and smoking, increase the risk of postirradiation parenchymal changes, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with a greater than twofold increase in skin complications. Breast reconstruction followed by irradiation can be successful, but patients with specific risks should be aware of increased complication rates.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 03/2010; 126(1):12-6. DOI:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181da878f · 2.99 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.