Article

Renal and cardiac abnormalities in primary hypertension.

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Journal of Hypertension (Impact Factor: 4.22). 05/2009; 27(5):1064-73. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283281213
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The relationship between mild reduction in renal function and cardiac structure and function have not yet been fully elucidated. We investigated cardiac and renal abnormalities in 400 untreated, nondiabetic patients (65% men, mean age 47 years) with primary hypertension and normal serum creatinine.
Renal abnormalities were defined as creatinine clearance less than 75 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (Cockcroft-Gault formula) and/or the presence of microalbuminuria (albumin-to-creatinine ratio). Left ventricular structure and function were assessed by echocardiography.
The prevalence of microalbuminuria and reduced creatinine clearance was 13 and 31%, respectively. Patients with renal abnormalities shared greater left ventricular mass index, higher prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy, and unfavorable geometric patterns. Microalbuminuria was also associated with inappropriate left ventricular mass and depressed midwall fractional shortening, whereas reduced creatinine clearance was associated with lower stroke volume and higher central pulse pressure/stroke volume ratio and total peripheral resistance. Stepwise regression analysis showed that both albuminuria and creatinine clearance were independently related to left ventricular mass. Logistic regression analysis of the reciprocal interaction of microalbuminuria and reduced creatinine clearance on the occurrence of subclinical cardiac damage showed that reduced creatinine clearance entailed a greater risk of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with normal albuminuria alone, whereas the presence of microalbuminuria was associated with a greater risk of left ventricular hypertrophy independently of creatinine clearance.
These findings provide further proof of the role of cardiorenal interaction in the development of hypertension-related cardiovascular disease, and may have clinical implications.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
86 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background and objectives Multiple studies support the prognostic role of both ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in patients with hypertension. Consequently, we evaluated the correlation between certain ambulatory BP monitoring parameters and left ventricular mass (LVM) measured by echocardiography in a sample of hypertensive patients. Material and methods A cross sectional, retrospective study was performed in 405 patients (53.8% women; mean age, 55.5 years), diagnosed with essential hypertension and referred to the Hypertension and Vascular Risk Unit by their primary care centers between 1 January, 1998 and 31 August, 1999. All patients underwent clinical and biological evaluation (using a standardized protocol), echocardiography, and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (SaceLabs 90207). Results Ambulatory BP monitoring revealed poor BP control in 320 patients (79%); the mean dip in systolic BP was 10.6 ± 0.9%. The dipper pattern was observed in 43.8%, the extreme dipper pattern in 13.4%, the non-dipper pattern in 30.2%, and the riser pattern in 12.6%. Left ventricular hypertrophy was identified in 248 patients (61.23%). An increase in ambulatory nocturnal BP was associated with an increase in LVM (p < 0.0001) and a statistically significant negative correlation was observed between the drop in BP and the increase in LVM (P<.0001). Conclusion An increase in LVM was associated with nocturnal hypertension and a decrease in the nocturnal drop in BP.
    Hipertensión y Riesgo Vascular 10/2013; 30(4):135–142.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: : To evaluate whether the relationship between early glomerular dysfunction and left-ventricular mass (LVM) occurs in a community sample and whether this relationship depends on haemodynamic factors. : In 621 randomly selected participants from a community sample (332 were normotensive), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), LVM and dimensions were determined using echocardiography, and aortic blood pressure (BP) assessed from applanation tonometry and SphygmoCor software. Aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) and high-quality 24-h BP values were available from 554 and 437 participants, respectively. : With adjustments for confounders (including clinic SBP), eGFR was associated with LVM index (LVMI) and LVM in excess of that predicted from stroke work (inappropriate LVM, LVMinappr) in all participants (LVMI: partial r = -0.18, P < 0.0001; LVMinappr: partial r = -0.17, P < 0.0001) and normotensive (LVMI: partial r = -0.23, P < 0.0001; LVMinappr: partial r = -0.22, P < 0.0001) separate from hypertensive patients. Marked differences in LVMinappr were noted in the eGFR range below 132 compared to at least 132 ml/min per 1.73 m (P < 0.0005). When replacing clinic BP with either aortic SBP, 24-h BP, PWV, stroke work (for LVMI), left-ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), or circumferential wall stress in the regression models, eGFR retained strong associations with LVMI (P = 0.01 to <0.0001) and LVMinappr (P < 0.005 to <0.0001) and these effects were replicated in normotensive separate from hypertensive patients. : Strong relationships between eGFR and LVM occur at a community level irrespective of the presence of hypertension and independent of 24-h and aortic BP, PWV, LVEDD, stroke work and wall stress. Non-haemodynamic factors explain a considerable proportion of the relationship between early glomerular dysfunction and left-ventricular hypertrophy.
    Journal of Hypertension 03/2013; 31(3):568-75. · 4.22 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Renal dysfunction is a common comorbidity in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We sought to determine whether renal dysfunction was associated with measures of cardiovascular structure/function in patients with HFpEF.
    European Heart Journal 06/2014; · 14.72 Impact Factor