Full-text

Available from: Federico Venuta, Mar 31, 2015
0 Bookmarks
 · 
83 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Europe, the old Continent, has been the cradle of thoracic surgery from the beginning of the last century. The structure and the activities of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) activities are directed to enlighten the path, provide the tools and set the standards for a quality inspired practice in thoracic surgery.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Controversies surrounding the efficacy of sealants against alveolar air leak (AAL) are abundant in the literature. We sought to test the widely used sealants, TachoSil (Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Osaka, Japan) and BioGlue (CryoLife Europa Ltd., Surrey, United Kingdom) in an in vitro model. Materials and Methods After creation of a focal superficial defect (40 × 25 mm) in swine lungs (n = 40), AAL was assessed with increasing inspired tidal volume (TVi). Upon sealant application in a randomized order, AAL was assessed in the same way until sealant burst. Results At TVi = 400, 500, 600, and 700 mL, BioGlue achieved sealing in 19, 19, 16, and 14 tests, while TachoSil sealed in 19, 14, 4, and no test, respectively. The maximally tolerated pressure of BioGlue was higher than TachoSil (40.3 ± 3.0 vs. 36.0 ± 4.9 cm H2O, p = 0.003). Cohesive and adhesive failures were found in 10 and 1 tests of BioGlue, respectively, while all burst failures of TachoSil were adhesive. Concerning elasticity, TachoSil allowed more expansion of the covered defect than BioGlue (6.3 ± 3.9 vs. 1.4 ± 1.0 mm, p < 0.001). Conclusion The tested sealants demonstrated high sealing efficacy. While BioGlue was superior in resisting higher ventilation pressure, TachoSil possessed better elasticity.
    The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon 09/2014; 62(8). DOI:10.1055/s-0034-1389272 · 1.08 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES Previous studies of the human fibrinogen-thrombin patch TachoSil® for air leak management in thoracic surgery have excluded patients undergoing redo surgery, a group at high risk of persistent air leaks. This is the first study to assess TachoSil® in patients undergoing redo surgery.METHODS Patients who had undergone pulmonary resection for primary lung cancer or lung metastasis and were scheduled for completion lobectomy plus lymphadenectomy due to tumour recurrence were eligible. After complete lobectomy, patients with intraoperative Macchiarini grade 3 air leaks (or >30% of the tidal volume at plethysmographic assessment) were randomized to receive either TachoSil® or further lung parenchymal stapling/suturing procedures according to standard surgical practice.RESULTSA total of 24 patients were randomized to TachoSil® (n = 13) or standard treatment (n = 11). Mean duration of surgery was significantly shorter in the TachoSil® group than in the standard group (3.6 vs 4.0 h; P = 0.023). The mean duration of air leaks was also significantly reduced in the TachoSil® group (4.7 vs 10.0 days; P < 0.001), and the removal of both the first and the second chest tubes occurred earlier (mean 3.8 vs 5.5 days; P = 0.005; and 6.1 vs 10.8 days; P < 0.001, respectively). TachoSil® was also effective in reducing persistent (≥9 days) air leaks (1 vs 7 patients; P = 0.008). There were no significant differences between groups in other postoperative complications. Mean length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in TachoSil®-treated patients (6.9 vs 9.5 days; P < 0.001).CONCLUSIONS TachoSil® was superior to standard stapling and suturing aerostatic techniques in reducing postoperative air leaks in patients undergoing redo thoracic surgery.
    Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery 02/2013; 16(5). DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivs571 · 1.11 Impact Factor