The elderly were under-represented in osteoarthritis clinical trials

Clinical and Molecular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece.
Journal of clinical epidemiology (Impact Factor: 3.42). 05/2009; 62(11):1218-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.12.009
Source: PubMed


Osteoarthritis is the most common disease affecting joints in the elderly. We aimed to evaluate if elderly patients are properly represented in clinical trials of diverse osteoarthritis interventions.
Clinical trials of osteoarthritis interventions were retrieved from Cochrane Library systematic reviews (2006, issue 2). We examined the age distribution of the trial participants and eligibility criteria.
We analyzed data from 219 eligible trials from 18 systematic reviews. The average mean age of the participants was 63 years. Only 13 trials (6.4%) had a mean age between 71 and 80 years and only one trial had a mean age exceeding 80 years. Among trials where the age range of participants was available or could be approximately inferred, we estimated that 66 (38%) trials had not included any patients over 80 years old. Only 23 trials specifically excluded patients over 70 based on reported eligibility criteria, but 168 trials excluded patients with various comorbidities and 142 trials excluded patients receiving other specific treatments.
Elderly patients are considerably under-represented in clinical trials of osteoarthritis. This causes an important deficit in the utility, relevance, and generalizability of trial results for this very common condition.

1 Follower
21 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To systematically review the literature on reported adverse effects (AE) associated with use of topical nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) in older adults with osteoarthritis (OA). A systematic search of Medline (1950 to November 2009), Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane databases, Dissertation and American College of Rheumatology meeting abstracts was performed to identify original randomized controlled trials, case reports, observational studies, editorials, or dissertations reporting AE from topical NSAID in older adults with OA. Information was sought on study and participant characteristics, detailed recording of application site, and systemic AE as well as withdrawals due to AE. The initial search yielded 953 articles of which 19 met eligibility criteria. Subjects receiving topical NSAID reported up to 39.3% application site AE, and up to 17.5% systemic AE. Five cases of warfarin potentiation with topical agents were reported, 1 resulting in gastrointestinal bleeding. In formal trials, the withdrawal rate from AE ranged from 0 to 21% in the topical agents, 0 to 25% in the oral NSAID, and 0 to 16% in the placebo group. Although topical NSAID are safer than oral NSAID (fewer severe gastrointestinal AE), a substantial proportion of older adults report systemic AE with topical agents. The withdrawal rate due to AE with topical agents is comparable to that of oral NSAID. Given the safety profile and withdrawal rates described in this study, further data are needed to determine the incremental benefits of topical NSAID compared to other treatment modalities in older adults with OA.
    The Journal of Rheumatology 04/2010; 37(6):1236-43. DOI:10.3899/jrheum.090935 · 3.19 Impact Factor

  • Rheumatology (Oxford, England) 10/2010; 50(7):1184-6. DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/keq332 · 4.48 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Moffatt eddies were observed as companions of each Stokes eigenmode in the square, in [Leriche E, Labrosse G. J Comput Phys 2004;200:489–511], regardless of the eigenmode symmetry. The present paper brings an answer about the possible existence of analogous localized corner vortices in trihedral rectangular corners, from numerically computed Stokes eigenmodes in a cubical cavity. Our spectrally accurate results do no exhibit such localized structure.
    Computers & Fluids 04/2011; 43(1):98-101. DOI:10.1016/j.compfluid.2010.09.037 · 1.62 Impact Factor
Show more