The Effects of a Presurgical Stress Management Intervention for Men With Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

Department of Behavioral Science, Integrative Medicine Program, Unit 1330, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, PO Box 301439, Houston, TX 77230, USA.
Journal of Clinical Oncology (Impact Factor: 18.43). 05/2009; 27(19):3169-76. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.16.0036
Source: PubMed


PURPOSE This study assessed the short-term and long-term efficacy of a presurgical stress management intervention at reducing mood disturbance and improving quality of life (QOL) in men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred fifty-nine men were randomly assigned to a two-session (plus two boosters) presurgical stress management intervention (SM), a two-session (plus two boosters) supportive attention group (SA), or a standard care group (SC). Assessments occurred 1 month before surgery; 1 week before surgery; the morning of surgery; 6 weeks after surgery, and 6 and 12 months after surgery. Results Results indicated significant group differences in mood disturbance before surgery (P = .02), such that men in the SM group had significantly less mood disturbance than men in the SC group (P = .006), with no significant differences between the SM and SA or SA and SC groups. In the year after surgery, there were significant group differences on Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short form survey (SF-36) physical component summary (PCS) scores (P = .004); men in the SM group had significantly higher PCS scores than men in the SC group (P = .0009), and there were no significant differences between the SM and SA or SA and SC groups. There were no group effects on prostate-specific QOL or SF-36 mental health scores. CONCLUSION These findings demonstrate the efficacy of a brief presurgical stress management intervention in improving some short-term and long-term outcomes. If these results are replicated, it may be a useful adjunct to standard care for men with prostate cancer undergoing surgery.

Download full-text


Available from: Qi Wei, Feb 19, 2014
  • Source
    • "The remainder of the studies occurred at different points between cancer diagnosis and survivorship. Two were brief presurgical interventions confined to the perisurgical period (Larson et al., 2000; Parker et al., 2009), whereas most targeted individuals receiving active treatment and typically started shortly postsurgery (Antoni et al., 2001; Antoni et al., 2006) or at the beginning or during adjuvant treatment (Allen et al., 2002; Arving et al., 2007; Manne et al., 2005; Manne et al., 2007; Scott et al., 2004; Wengstrom "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Cancer-related traumatic stress symptoms, including posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), can significantly impact the quality of life and psychological adjustment of patients and survivors with cancer. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an effective intervention previously shown to ameliorate non-cancer-related PTSD. Because of some of the unique aspects of cancer-related traumatic stress, such as the internal and ongoing nature of the traumatic stressor, it is important to review the overall efficacy of CBT interventions in populations with cancer. Objective: To review the findings of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) testing the efficacy of interventions with CBT components for cancer-related traumatic stress symptoms, including intrusion and avoidance, in adults with cancer. Methods: Eligible RCTs were identified via search of OVID, PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus. Bayesian random effects analysis of treatment effect sizes (ES) was conducted in a portion of the studies for which data were available. Results: Nineteen RCTs met search criteria. Six trials reported reductions in traumatic stress symptoms as a result of the intervention and 13 studies reported null findings. Bayesian modeling based on 13 studies showed no overall discernible effect of interventions with CBT components on intrusion and avoidance symptoms. Conclusions: Most of the studies were not designed to target traumatic stress symptoms in highly distressed patients with cancer and did not include previously validated CBT components, such as cognitive restructuring and exposure. Thus, there was insufficient evidence from which to draw definitive conclusions about the efficacy of CBT interventions for the treatment of cancer-related traumatic stress symptoms, including PTSD. However, interventions with CBT components may have potential for the reduction of PTSD symptoms in highly distressed patients. Future research should focus on testing trauma-focused interventions in demographically and clinically diverse samples.
    Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy 08/2013; 27(3):258. DOI:10.1891/0889-8391.27.3.258
  • Source

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Traditional and innovative power conditioning system configurations for 40 MW, 100 MW and 400 MW OTEC plants are parametrically reviewed for their inherent characteristics of cost, space, weight, fault current, power loss, reliability, serviceability, complexity and flexibility. These results demonstrate the utility of each power conditioning equipment and system configuration for various OTEC plant sizes and types. Recommendations identify areas for further energy transfer system development.
    OCEANS; 10/1982
Show more