Positional and surface area asymmetry of the human cortex

Department of Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
NeuroImage (Impact Factor: 6.36). 05/2009; 46(4):895-903. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.063
Source: PubMed


Previous studies of cortical asymmetry have relied mainly on voxel-based morphometry (VBM), or manual segmentation of regions of interest. This study uses fully automated, surface-based techniques to analyse position and surface area asymmetry for the mid-surfaces of 112 right-handed subjects' cortical hemispheres from a cohort of young adults. Native space measurements of local surface area asymmetry and vertex position asymmetry were calculated from surfaces registered to a previously validated hemisphere-unbiased surface-based template. Our analysis confirms previously identified hemispheric asymmetries (Yakovlevian torque, frontal and occipital petalia) in enhanced detail. It does not support previous findings of gender/asymmetry interactions or rightward planum parietale areal increase. It reveals several new findings, including a striking leftward increase in surface area of the supramarginal gyrus (peak effect 18%), compared with a smaller areal increase in the left Heschl's gyrus and planum temporale region (peak effect 8%). A second finding was rightward increase in surface area (peak effect 10%) in a band around the medial junction between the occipital lobe, and parietal and temporal lobes. By clearly separating out the effects of structural translocation and surface area change from those of thickness and curvature, this study resolves the confound of these variables inherent in VBM studies.

23 Reads
  • Source
    • "Cortical thickness was measured between the two surfaces at 40,962 vertices per hemisphere using the linked distance in native space (Lerch and Evans, 2005). The middle cortical surface, defined as the geometric center between the inner and outer cortical surfaces, was used to calculate the cortical surface area in native space (Lyttelton et al., 2009). The thickness/surface area map was further blurred with a 30 mm surface-based diffusion smoothing kernel (Chung et al., 2003). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abnormalities in large-scale brain networks have been recently reported in dyslexia; however, it remains unclear whether these abnormalities are congenital (due to dyslexia per se) or arise later in development. Here, structural magnetic resonance imaging data of 17 Chinese reading disabled (RD) and 17 age-matched typically developing (TD) children were used to construct cortical thickness (sensitive to postnatal development) and surface area (sensitive to prenatal development) networks. In the thickness network, compared to TD, RD showed reduced nodal network properties (e.g., degree and betweenness) in the left hemisphere along with enhanced nodal properties mainly in the right hemisphere. As for the surface area network, compared to TD, RD demonstrated lower nodal properties in posterior brain regions and higher nodal properties in anterior brain regions. Furthermore, hubs in both the thickness and surface area networks in RD were more distributed in frontal areas and less distributed in parietal areas, whereas TD showed the opposite pattern. Altogether, these findings indicate that the aberrant structural connectivity in the dyslexic individuals was not only due to a late developmental effect reflected in the altered thickness network, but may also be a congenital effect during prenatal development, reflected in the altered surface network.
    NeuroImage 09/2015; 124. DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.09.011 · 6.36 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "However, this cortical symmetry is not perfect because of the global torsion of the brain, the Yaklovian torque, which makes difficult a point-topoint correspondence between cortical areas that are functionally homotopic (Toga and Thompson, 2003). In addition, the torque goes along with asymmetries in sulcus depth and position in relation to differences in asymmetries in neighboring cortices (Lyttelton et al., 2009); the largest sulcal and cortical asymmetries in newborns and adults are located at the termination of the Sylvian fissure and at the superior temporal sulcus (Hill et al., 2010). These gross morphological differences across hemispheres increase the difficulty in defining homotopic regions in the temporal and inferior parietal areas. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Atlases of brain anatomical ROIs are widely used for functional MRI data analysis. Recently, it was proposed that an atlas of ROIs derived from a functional brain parcellation could be advantageous, in particular for understanding how different regions share information. However, functional atlases so far proposed do not account for a crucial aspect of cerebral organization, namely homotopy, i.e. that each region in one hemisphere has an homologue in the other hemisphere. We present AICHA (for Atlas of Intrinsic Connectivity of Homotopic Areas), a functional brain ROIs atlas based on resting-state fMRI data acquired in 281 individuals. AICHA ROIs cover the whole cerebrum, each having 1- homogeneity of its constituting voxels intrinsic activity, and 2- a unique homotopic contralateral counterpart with which it has maximal intrinsic connectivity. AICHA was built in 4 steps: (1) estimation of resting-state networks (RSNs) using individual resting-state fMRI independent components, (2) k-means clustering of voxel-wise group level profiles of connectivity, (3) homotopic regional grouping based on maximal inter-hemispheric functional correlation, and (4) ROI labeling. AICHA includes 192 homotopic region pairs (122 gyral, 50 sulcal, and 20 grey nuclei). As an application, we report inter-hemispheric (homotopic and heterotopic) and intra-hemispheric connectivity patterns at different sparsities. ROI functional homogeneity was higher for AICHA than for anatomical ROI atlases, but slightly lower than for another functional ROI atlas not accounting for homotopy. AICHA is ideally suited for intrinsic/effective connectivity analyses, as well as for investigating brain hemispheric specialization. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.
    Journal of Neuroscience Methods 07/2015; 254. DOI:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.07.013 · 2.05 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Shading indicates regions where the results of the current study, the results of analysing the OASIS data, and those of previous studies are in agreement. (G = Good et al., 2001; G13 = Goldberg et al., 2013; H = Herve et al., 2006; L = Lyttelton et al., 2009; L6 = Luders et al., 2006; S = Szabo et al., 2006; V = Van Essen et al., 2012; W = Watkins et al., 2001; Z = Zhou et al., 2013) temporal and Heschl's gyrus, as well as relatively increased areas in the LH supramarginal gyrus and the RH middle frontal gyrus. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previous research studies have reported many hemispherical asymmetries in cortical and subcortical anatomy, but only a subset of findings is consistent across studies. Here, we used improved Freesurfer-based automated methods to analyse the properties of the cortex and seven subcortical structures in 138 young adult subjects. Male and female subjects showed similar hemispheric asymmetries in gyral and sulcal structures, with many areas associated with language processing enlarged in the left hemisphere (LH) and a number of areas associated with visuospatial processing enlarged in the right hemisphere (RH). In addition, we found greater (non-directional) cortical asymmetries in subjects with larger brains. Asymmetries in subcortical structures included larger LH volumes of thalamus, putamen and globus pallidus and larger RH volumes of the cerebellum and the amygdala. We also found significant correlations between the subcortical structural volumes, particularly of the thalamus and cerebellum, with cortical area. These results help to resolve some of the inconsistencies in previous studies of hemispheric asymmetries in brain anatomy.
    Laterality 04/2015; 20(6):1-27. DOI:10.1080/1357650X.2015.1032975 · 1.13 Impact Factor
Show more