Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status of vegetarians, partial vegetarians, and nonvegetarians: the Adventist Health Study-2.

Adventist Health Study-2, School of Public Health, Loma Linda University Loma Linda, CA, USA.
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (Impact Factor: 6.92). 04/2009; 89(5):1686S-1692S. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.26736X
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Vegans and other vegetarians who limit their intake of animal products may be at greater risk of vitamin D deficiency than nonvegetarians, because foods providing the highest amount of vitamin D per gram naturally are all from animal sources, and fortification with vitamin D currently occurs in few foods.
We assessed serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [s25(OH)D] concentrations and factors affecting them in vegetarians, partial vegetarians, and nonvegetarians in a sample of calibration study subjects from the Adventist Health Study-2.
Food-frequency questionnaires and sun-exposure data were obtained from 199 black and 229 non-Hispanic white adults. We compared s25(OH)D concentration, dietary and supplemental vitamin D intake, and sun exposure in the different dietary groups.
We found no significant difference in s25(OH)D by vegetarian status for either white or black subjects. Among whites, dietary vitamin D intake and sun behavior were different between vegetarian groups, but there was no difference in skin type distribution. Among blacks, no significant differences were observed for any of these variables between vegetarian groups. The mean (+/-SD) s25(OH)D was higher in whites (77.1 +/- 10.33 nmol/L) than in blacks (50.7 +/- 27.4 nmol/L) (P < 0.0001).
s25(OH)D concentrations were not associated with vegetarian status. Other factors, such as vitamin D supplementation, degree of skin pigmentation, and amount and intensity of sun exposure have greater influence on s25(OH)D than does diet.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Precise data on food chemical composition is crucial for any quantitative nutrition research and indispensable for evaluation and planning of computer-based menus. Moreover, exact food chemical composition is of the utmost importance in composing specific diets that may be low in certain essential nutrients. Therefore, this research evaluated a weekly vegan menu using three different food composition databases (FCDB): the Croatian, the official Danish Food Composition Database and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) - National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were determined in evaluated and optimised offers for the same menu when using different FCDBs. Furthermore, in these menus quantities of some nutrients have not reached official daily recommendations needed for prevention of non-communicable diseases. In this research, new vegan menus that can provide adequate quantity of essential nutrients, regardless of FCDB utilized, were created with linear optimisation (LO). This resulted in high quality daily menu offers. However, depending on the FCDB that was used, optimal menus differed in daily meal combinations, and the effectiveness of the optimisation in the minimisation of differences caused by differences of data in FCDBs was tested. Linear optimisation has been proved to be an effective tool in planning of specific diets, such as vegan diets. Nonetheless, the quality of computer-planned menus depends heavily on the quality of FCDB used.
    Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 10/2014; 37. DOI:10.1016/j.jfca.2014.07.002 · 2.26 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Substantial evidence exists linking food production and environmental degradation. Climate change may alter agricultural productivity across wide areas, decreasing food security. Often overlooked is the interconnection between food consumption patterns and climate change. We compared the carbon emissions of agricultural inputs required to produce vegetarian and nonvegetarian diets. Methods: Food consumption patterns of vegetarians were compared with nonvegetarians, by using data from the Adventist Health Study, a cohort of 34,000 California Adventists, of which 45% were vegetarians. Consumption of 10 foods, of a 50 food-item questionnaire, was significantly different by vegetarians (beef, chicken, eggs, beans, and six fruits). California agricultural practices and commodity production data were collected for three carbon-intensive operations: fertilizer and pesticide application, and primary energy. The three inputs were converted into carbon equivalent (CE) emissions per amount of commodity produced using published emission factors, and subsequently multiplied by the differential consumption of the 10 food items. Results: Consumption of a vegetarian diet resulted in 2.4 times less CE emissions compared to a nonvegetarian diet in this population. Producing the commodities for the vegetarian diet required fertilizer, pesticide, and primary energy inputs, which resulted in 4.0, 2.5, and 1.05 less CE emissions, respectively. The emissions associated with the production of a vegetarian diet are annually 7.1 kg CE per capita less than those of a nonvegetarian diet. Conclusion: Producing a vegetarian diet results in substantially less GHG emissions than a nonvegetarian diet. These findings support the hypothesis that plant-based diets have a lower global warming potential than meat-based diets, although exceptions may occur in relation to some agricultural practices, transportation and processing. Daily food choices of large segments of the population may ultimately result in major impacts on the environment and have public health consequences. Diet matters for mitigating climate change.
    Epidemiology 11/2009; 20(6):S262. DOI:10.1097/01.ede.0000362876.88912.15 · 6.18 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study aimed to develop and validate a de novo food frequency questionnaire for self-defined vegans in the United States. Diet histories from pilot samples of vegans and a modified 'Block Method' using seven selected nutrients of concern in vegan diet patterns, were employed to generate the questionnaire food list. Food frequency responses of 100 vegans from 19 different U.S. states were obtained via completed mailed questionnaires and compared to multiple telephone-conducted diet recall interviews. Computerized diet analyses were performed. Correlation coefficients, t-tests, rank, cross-tabulations, and probability tests were used to validate and compare intake estimates and dietary reference intake (DRI) assessment trends between the two methods. A 369-item vegan-specific questionnaire was developed with 252 listed food frequency items. Calorie-adjusted correlation coefficients ranged from r = 0.374 to 0.600 (p < 0.001) for all analyzed nutrients except calcium. Estimates, ranks, trends and higher-level participant percentile placements for Vitamin B12 were similar with both methods. Questionnaire intakes were higher than recalls for most other nutrients. Both methods demonstrated similar trends in DRI adequacy assessment (e.g., significantly inadequate vitamin D intake among vegans). This vegan-specific questionnaire can be a useful assessment tool for health screening initiatives in U.S. vegan communities.
    Nutrients 07/2014; 6(7):2523-2539. DOI:10.3390/nu6072523 · 3.15 Impact Factor


Available from