Neural and genetic foundations of face recognition and prosopagnosia.

University of Vienna, Faculty of Psychology, Vienna, Austria
Journal of Neuropsychology (Impact Factor: 3.82). 04/2008; 2(Pt 1):79-97. DOI: 10.1348/174866407X231001
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Faces are of essential importance for human social life. They provide valuable information about the identity, expression, gaze, health, and age of a person. Recent face-processing models assume highly interconnected neural structures between different temporal, occipital, and frontal brain areas with several feedback loops. A selective deficit in the visual learning and recognition of faces is known as prosopagnosia, which can be found both in acquired and congenital form. Recently, a hereditary sub-type of congenital prosopagnosia with a very high prevalence rate of 2.5% has been identified. Recent research results show that hereditary prosopagnosia is a clearly circumscribed face-processing deficit with a characteristic set of clinical symptoms. Comparing face processing of people of prosopagnosia with that of controls can help to develop a more conclusive and integrated model of face processing. Here, we provide a summary of the current state of face processing research. We also describe the different types of prosopagnosia and present the set of typical symptoms found in the hereditary type. Finally, we will discuss the implications for future face recognition research.


Available from: Martina Grüter, May 07, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is growing evidence to suggest that facial motion is an important cue for face recognition. However, it is poorly understood whether motion is integrated with facial form information or whether it provides an independent cue to identity. To provide further insight into this issue, we compared the effect of motion on face perception in two developmental prosopagnosics and age-matched controls. Participants first learned faces presented dynamically (video), or in a sequence of static images, in which rigid (viewpoint) or non-rigid (expression) changes occurred. Immediately following learning, participants were required to match a static face image to the learned face. Test face images varied by viewpoint (Experiment 1) or expression (Experiment 2) and were learned or novel face images. We found similar performance across prosopagnosics and controls in matching facial identity across changes in viewpoint when the learned face was shown moving in a rigid manner. However, non-rigid motion interfered with face matching across changes in expression in both individuals with prosopagnosia compared to the performance of control participants. In contrast, non-rigid motion did not differentially affect the matching of facial expressions across changes in identity for either prosopagnosics (Experiment 3). Our results suggest that whilst the processing of rigid motion information of a face may be preserved in developmental prosopagnosia, non-rigid motion can specifically interfere with the representation of structural face information. Taken together, these results suggest that both form and motion cues are important in face perception and that these cues are likely integrated in the representation of facial identity. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
    Neuropsychologia 02/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.038 · 3.45 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Human visual system heavily relies on the spatial configuration among facial parts in discriminating faces. There are individual differences in the ability of configural face processing, which are supposed to be partly attributable to genetic predispositions. However, few studies have identified a specific gene linked to configural face processing ability. The present study investigated an association between configural mode of face processing and a single-nucleotide polymorphism in codon 158 of catechol-O-methyltransferase gene (COMT Val(158)Met polymorphism) using part-spacing paradigm. The results have revealed superior sensitivity to the changes in facial configuration in participants with Met/Met genotype of COMT Val(158)Met polymorphism compared to the other genotypes. This effect was virtually eliminated when the faces were presented upside-down. There was no group-difference in the ability to detect the change in morphological features of individual facial parts. These results indicate that COMT Val(158)Met polymorphism partly explains the individual differences in the ability of configural face processing. Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
    Neuroscience Letters 12/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.neulet.2014.12.001 · 2.06 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many portable devices need a simple authentication system to protect them from being used by an unauthenticated person such as a thief. The security of traditional methods such as pin codes or passwords is limited by shoulder surfing where a casual or intentional observer observes an authentication session and derives all information necessary for authentication. Graphical authentication systems have been developed to forestall this attack. We present here an especially simple variant of a graphical authentication system based on the capacity of humans to recognize faces well. In our challenge-response scheme, a user is presented with a row of typically three faces and needs to decide whether the number of ???friends??? is even or odd. We present here an analysis of security and usability of this scheme.
    IEEE Latin America Transactions 01/2015; 13(3):804-809. DOI:10.1109/TLA.2015.7069108 · 0.19 Impact Factor