Article

MDCT diagnosis of penetrating diaphragm injury.

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 S Greene St., Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
European Radiology (Impact Factor: 4.34). 04/2009; 19(8):1875-81. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1367-9
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of the study was to determine the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of multidetector CT (MDCT) in detection of diaphragmatic injury following penetrating trauma. Chest and abdominal CT examinations performed preoperatively in 136 patients after penetrating trauma to the torso with injury trajectory in close proximity to the diaphragm were reviewed by radiologists unaware of surgical findings. Signs associated with diaphragmatic injuries in penetrating trauma were noted. These signs were correlated with surgical diagnoses, and their sensitivity and specificity in assisting the diagnosis were calculated. CT confirmed diaphragmatic injury in 41 of 47 injuries (sensitivity, 87.2%), and an intact diaphragm in 71 of 98 patients (specificity, 72.4%). The overall accuracy of MDCT was 77%. The most accurate sign helping the diagnosis was contiguous injury on either side of the diaphragm in single-entry penetrating trauma (sensitivity, 88%; specificity, 82%). Thus MDCT has high sensitivity and good specificity in detecting penetrating diaphragmatic injuries.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
97 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many of the patients with thoraco-abdominal stab wound remain asymptomatic; in this regard, previous studies reported that 7-48% of asymptomatic patients had diaphragm injury (DI). Thoracoscopy or multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scan is the best method to detect DI. We aimed to evaluate the role of CT scan with intrapleural contrast to rule out DI in stable thoraco-abdominal stab wounds. In a prospective study, we evaluated all haemodynamically stable patients with thoraco-abdominal stab wound, from October 2009 to 2010. Exclusion criteria included patients who needed emergency thoracotomy or laparotomy, those who were haemodynamically unstable and those with blunt trauma or gunshot injury. In the CT-scan department, 500 cc of diluted meglumine diatrozate was transfused into the pleural space via a chest tube and the CT scan was performed from the dome of the diaphragm to the pelvic cavity. In the second step, all patients were taken for thoracoscopy within 24h after admission. The CT-scan slide was considered positive if one of the following signs was found: (1) the diaphragm was obviously injured as seen in CT-scan slides and (2) contrast agent was seen in the peritoneal cavity. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for CT scan and thoracoscopy. Four out of 40 patients had DI according to thoracoscopy. CT scan with intrapleural contrast predicted diaphragmatic injury correctly in all four patients. Considering thoracoscopy as the gold-standard method, the CT scan had two false-positive cases. The sensitivity of the intrapleural-contrast CT scan was 100% and its specificity was 94.4%. Our study showed that CT scan with intrapleural contrast can be an acceptable approach to rule out DI and limit the use of thoracoscopy for final diagnosis and repair of DI in cases with suspicious or positive CT-scan results, especially in trauma centres with high load of trauma patients and little accessible equipment.
    Injury 07/2011; 43(9):1466-9. · 2.46 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Diaphragmatic injury is an uncommon traumatic condition. It can be easily missed due to a lack of awareness by both clinicians and radiologists. A high index of suspicion is required for the establishment of an early diagnosis and prevention of life-threatening complications. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is the modality of choice for the detection of diaphragmatic injury. In this review article, we illustrate the MDCT appearance of blunt and penetrating diaphragmatic injuries and emphasize the role of the emergency radiologist in detecting these entities.
    La radiologia medica 08/2014; · 1.46 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article reviews current and evolving concepts in the diagnosis of penetrating diaphragmatic injury with multidetector CT (MDCT). As criteria for nonoperative management in the setting of penetrating trauma become more inclusive, confident exclusion of penetrating diaphragmatic injury (PDI) has become imperative. Diagnostic performance of MDCT for PDI has improved substantially with the use of thin sections and multiplanar reformats. Evaluation of injury trajectory in nonstandard planes using 3D post-processing software can aid in the diagnosis. Contiguous injury and transdiaphragmatic trajectory are the best predictors of PDI. Careful appraisal of the diaphragm for defects should be undertaken in all patients with thoracoabdominal penetrating trauma.
    Emergency Radiology 07/2014;