Article

Rosuvastatin and Cardiovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis

Department of Medical Science, Renal Unit, University Hospital, SE-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
New England Journal of Medicine (Impact Factor: 54.42). 05/2009; 360(14):1395-407. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810177
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Statins reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients at high cardiovascular risk. However, a benefit of statins in such patients who are undergoing hemodialysis has not been proved.
We conducted an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, prospective trial involving 2776 patients, 50 to 80 years of age, who were undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. We randomly assigned patients to receive rosuvastatin, 10 mg daily, or placebo. The combined primary end point was death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. Secondary end points included death from all causes and individual cardiac and vascular events.
After 3 months, the mean reduction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels was 43% in patients receiving rosuvastatin, from a mean baseline level of 100 mg per deciliter (2.6 mmol per liter). During a median follow-up period of 3.8 years, 396 patients in the rosuvastatin group and 408 patients in the placebo group reached the primary end point (9.2 and 9.5 events per 100 patient-years, respectively; hazard ratio for the combined end point in the rosuvastatin group vs. the placebo group, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.11; P=0.59). Rosuvastatin had no effect on individual components of the primary end point. There was also no significant effect on all-cause mortality (13.5 vs. 14.0 events per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.07; P=0.51).
In patients undergoing hemodialysis, the initiation of treatment with rosuvastatin lowered the LDL cholesterol level but had no significant effect on the composite primary end point of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00240331.)

4 Followers
 · 
193 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to compare the risk of complications and outcome between infarct-related artery (IRA)-only revascularization and multivessel (MV) revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) with renal insufficiency and MV disease. A total of 1,031 acute MI patients with renal insufficiency and MV disease who were registered in the Korea Working Group on Myocardial Infarction were enrolled. They were divided into two groups (IRA-only revascularization group, n = 404; MV revascularization group, n = 627), and investigated the cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and the incidence of complications after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Complications after PCI occurred in 19.9% of all patients (206/1,031). Complications after PCI occurred more frequently in the MV revascularization group compared with the IRA-only revascularization group (20.1% [126/627] vs. 15.3% [62/404], respectively; p = 0.029]. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 6.3%, and there was no significant difference between the groups (5.2% in the IRA-only revascularization group vs. 7.0% in the MV revascularization group; p = 0.241). The total incidence of MACE was 11.1%, and there was no significant difference between the groups (11.6% in the IRA-only revascularization group vs. 10.7% in the MV revascularization group; p = 0.636). The incidence of complications after PCI was significantly lower in the IRA-only revascularization group compared with the MV revascularization group. However, there were no significant difference in the 12-month outcomes between groups in patients with acute MI and renal insufficiency with MV disease.
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 03/2015; 30(2):177-90. DOI:10.3904/kjim.2015.30.2.177
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) do not receive lipid-lowering therapy despite their high cardiovascular risk. The reasons for this are unknown. We have conducted a retrospective cohort study of discontinuation of lipid-lowering drugs in patients with CKD stage 3 and higher treated in practices affiliated with two academic medical centers between 2000 and 2010. Information on medication discontinuation and its reasons was obtained from electronic medical records, including natural language processing of electronic notes using previously validated software. Out of 14,034 patients in the study cohort, 10,072 (71.8%) stopped their lipid-lowering drugs at least once, and 2,444 (17.4%) stopped them for at least 1 month. Patients who had a comorbidity associated with higher cardiovascular risk were less likely to stop lipid-lowering drugs. Insurance request was the most common explicitly documented reason for discontinuation, and adverse reactions were the most common reason for long-term discontinuation. In a multivariable analysis, patients were more likely to stop a lipid-lowering drug because of an insurance request if they had government insurance and they were also more likely to stop a lipid-lowering drug because of adverse reactions if they had a history of multiple adverse reactions to other medications. There was no significant relationship between CKD stage and the reason for discontinuation of lipid-lowering drugs. Patients with CKD frequently stop lipid-lowering drugs. Insurance requests and adverse reactions are common reasons for the discontinuation. Further research is needed to ensure appropriate lipid-lowering therapy for these individuals at high cardiovascular risk.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Lipids are essential components of cell membranes, contributing to cell fuel, myelin formation, subcellular organelle function, and steroid hormone synthesis. Children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) exhibit various co-morbidities, including dyslipidemia. The prevalence of dyslipidemias in children with CKD and ESRD is high, being present in 39-65 % of patients. Elevated lipid levels in children without renal disease are a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), while the risk for CVD in pediatric CKD/ESRD is unclear. The pathogenesis of dyslipidemia in CKD features various factors, including increased levels of triglycerides, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, apolipoprotein C3 (ApoC-III), decreased levels of cholesterylester transfer protein and high-density lipoproteins, and aberrations in serum very low-density and intermediate-density lipoproteins. If initial risk assessment indicates that a child with advanced CKD has 2 or more co-morbidities for CVD, first-line treatment should consist of non-pharmacologic management such as therapeutic lifestyle changes and dietary counseling. Pharmacologic treatment of dyslipidemia may reduce the incidence of CVD in children with CKD/ESRD, but randomized trials are lacking. Statins are the only class of lipid-lowering drugs currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in the pediatric population. FDA-approved pediatric labeling for these drugs is based on results from placebo-controlled trial results, showing 30-50 % reductions in baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Although statins are generally well tolerated in adults, a spectrum of adverse events has been reported with their use in both the clinical trial and post-marketing settings.
    Pediatric Nephrology 03/2015; DOI:10.1007/s00467-015-3075-9 · 2.88 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
77 Downloads
Available from
May 21, 2014