Gélinas C, Arbour C. Behavioral and physiologic indicators during a nociceptive procedure in conscious and unconscious mechanically ventilated adults: Similar or different? J Crit Care.24:628.e7-628.17

School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Journal of critical care (Impact Factor: 2.19). 04/2009; 24(4):628.e7-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.01.013
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to describe behavioral and physiologic indicators to a nociceptive procedure in conscious and unconscious mechanically ventilated adults and to examine their association with the patients' self-reports of pain.
A total of 257 intensive care unit patients (144 conscious and 113 unconscious) from 4 clinical settings in Canada participated. Patients were observed at rest, during a nociceptive procedure, and 20 minutes postprocedure. Behavioral indicators were measured with the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT), and physiologic indicators were documented from the available monitoring.
Conscious patients showed more intense behaviors and a more elevated mean arterial pressure compared with unconscious patients at all measurements. Conscious patients who self-reported being in pain during the procedure showed more intense behaviors compared with patients without pain. Only the CPOT score could predict the presence or the absence of pain on the basis of the patient's self-report during the procedure.
The use of behaviors is strongly recommended for pain assessment in unconscious patients, and results from this study support this clinical guideline. Vital signs should be used with caution for the detection of pain as they can be influenced by other factors besides pain.

Download full-text


Available from: Caroline Arbour, Aug 22, 2015
  • Source
    • "Regarding the CPOT, a cut-off score (> 2) for the presence of pain was empirically determined using ROC curve analysis in verbal critically ill patients (Gé linas et al., 2009a). This can allow the detection of the presence of pain as well as the evaluation of the effectiveness of pain management interventions. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) is one of the few behavioural pain scales which have been developed and validated for the purpose of detecting pain in nonverbal critically ill adults. This study aimed to complete a pre and post evaluation of the implementation of the CPOT on pain assessment/management nursing practices in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with nonverbal critically ill adults. A before-and-after study design was used. Setting/Participants: The Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of a university affiliated health care centre in Montérégie (Canada) was selected for the implementation of the CPOT. All ICU nurses were trained to use the CPOT. Medical files were selected if the patient was 18 years or older, had been mechanically ventilated for a period ≥ 24hours, was unable to communicate, and had intact motor function. This implementation study included three steps: 1) pre-implementation phase, 2) implementation phase, and 3) post-implementation phase. The pre-implementation phase included the review of 30 medical files to describe the current nursing practice in pain assessment and management prior to the introduction of the CPOT. During the implementation phase, 60 ICU nurses attended standardized training sessions on the use of the CPOT and practiced the scoring with the CPOT using patients' videotapes. In the post-implementation phase, the interrater reliability of ICU nurses when using the CPOT was tested using three patients' videotapes. Also, pain assessment and management nursing practices were evaluated by reviewing 30 medical files at 3 months, and 30 others at 12 months post-implementation. Nurses' percentage of agreement when scoring patients with the CPOT by viewing the videotapes was high post-implementation of the tool (>87%). Reports of pain assessments were more frequently charted in the medical files in the post-implementation phase (10.5 to 12 assessments in a 24-hour period) compared with the pre-implementation phase (3 assessments in a 24-hour period). Interestingly, fewer analgesic and sedative agents were administered during the post-implementation phase. The CPOT was successfully implemented and seemed to have positive effects on pain assessment and management nursing practices in the ICU. Further research is warranted to look at its impact on patient outcomes.
    International journal of nursing studies 05/2011; 48(12):1495-504. DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.03.012 · 2.25 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bei der Übertragung moderner Konzepte der Sedierung und Respiratorentwöhnung aus der allgemeinen auf die neurologische Intensivmedizin sind einige Besonderheiten zu bedenken. Hierzu gehören die speziellen intrakraniellen Druckverhältnisse, eine oft gestörte Autoregulation, die Anfälligkeit für epileptische Anfälle und die Häufung einer Delirentwicklung. Die Vorteile von Sedierungsprotokollen, Scores für Sedierungs- und Analgesiesteuerung sowie einer individualisierten Substanzenauswahl mit Betonung der Analgesie sind auch für die Neurointensivmedizin abzusehen, bisher aber nur wenig untersucht. Bei der Respiratorentwöhnung und Extubation des neurologischen Intensivpatienten ist zum einen zu bedenken, dass konventionelle Weanings- und Extubationskriterien mitunter nicht beurteilbar sind und daher nur orientierenden Charakter haben, und zum anderen, dass sehr häufig eine Dysphagie vorliegt.
    Der Nervenarzt 12/2012; 83(12). DOI:10.1007/s00115-012-3527-4 · 0.86 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Studies have demonstrated that patients in the intensive care unit experience high levels of pain. While many of these patients are nonverbal at some point during their stay, there are few valid tools available to assess pain in this group. To evaluate the validity and clinical utility of two pain assessment tools, the revised Adult Non-Verbal Pain Scale (NVPS-R) and the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT), in a trauma and neurosurgical patient population. Patients were assessed using the NVPS-R and CPOT by trained intensive care unit nurses (n=23) and research assistants before, during and after two procedures: turning of the patient (nociceptive procedure) and noninvasive blood pressure cuff inflation (non-nociceptive procedure). Communicative patients were also asked to report their level of pain during each assessment. A total of 66 patients (34 communicative, 32 noncommunicative) were included in the study. CPOT and NVPS-R scores increased significantly when participants were exposed to turning, but not during noninvasive blood pressure measurement (repeated measures ANOVA: CPOT, F=5.81, P=0.019; NVPS-R, F=5.32, P=0.025) supporting discriminant validity. CPOT and NVPS-R scores were significantly higher during the turning procedure for patients who had indicated that they were in pain versus those who were not, indicating criterion validity. Inter-rater reliability was generally higher for the CPOT than NVPS-R. Nurses rated the feasibility of the two tools as comparable but provided higher ratings of acceptability for the CPOT. While the present study supports the use of the CPOT and the NVPS-R with critically ill trauma and neurosurgical patients, further research should explore the role of vital signs in pain.
    01/2013; 18(6):e107-14.
Show more