Low Sensitivity of Rapid Diagnostic Test for Influenza

Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Clinical Infectious Diseases (Impact Factor: 8.89). 06/2009; 48(9):e89-92. DOI: 10.1086/597828
Source: PubMed


The QuickVue Influenza A+B Test (Quidel) was used to test nasal swab specimens obtained from persons with influenza-like illness
in 3 different populations. Compared with reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, the test sensitivity was low for
all populations (median, 27%; range, 19%–32%), whereas the specificity was high (median, 97%; range, 96%–99.6%).

Download full-text


Available from: Stephen S. Morse,
    • "Timely detection of IAV is needed at agricultural fairs, which makes submission to a diagnostic laboratory impractical. Commercially available rapid immunoassays, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based test kits, are useful for detecting IAV antigen in clinical samples from symptomatic humans (Storch, 2003; Fedorko et al., 2006; Hurt et al., 2007; Uyeki et al., 2009). In the United States, a licensed rapid on-farm test for IAV in swine (Flu DETECT â Swine; Zoetis, Florham Park, NJ, USA) is now available. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Agricultural fairs create an unconventional animal-human interface that has been associated with swine-to-human transmission of influenza A virus (IAV) in recent years. Early detection of IAV-infected pigs at agricultural fairs would allow veterinarians to better protect swine and human health during these swine exhibitions. This study assessed the use of swine body temperature measurement, recorded by infrared and rectal thermometers, as a practical method to detect IAV-infected swine at agricultural fairs. In our first objective, infrared thermometers were used to record the body surface temperature of 1,092 pigs at the time of IAV nasal swab collection at the end of the exhibition period of 55 agricultural fairs. IAV was recovered from 212 (19.4%) pigs, and the difference in mean infrared body temperature measurement of IAV-positive and IAV-negative pigs was 0.83°C. In a second objective, snout wipes were collected from 1,948 pigs immediately prior to the unloading of the animals at a single large swine exhibition. Concurrent to the snout wipe collection, owners took the rectal temperatures of his/her pigs. In this case, 47 (2.4%) pigs tested positive for IAV before they entered the swine barn. The mean rectal temperatures differed by only 0.19°C between IAV-positive and IAV-negative pigs. The low prevalence of IAV among the pigs upon entry to the fair in the second objective provides evidence that limiting intraspecies spread of IAV during the fairs will likely have significant impacts on the zoonotic transmission. However, in both objectives, the high degree of similarity in the body temperature measurements between the IAV-positive and IAV-negative pigs made it impossible to set a diagnostically meaningful cut point to differentiate IAV status of the individual animals. Unfortunately, body temperature measurement cannot be used to accurately screen exhibition swine for IAV. © 2015 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.
    Zoonoses and Public Health 04/2015; DOI:10.1111/zph.12201 · 2.37 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Commercially available, widely used rapid influenza diagnostic tests do not distinguish among influenza A virus subtypes and are less sensitive than viral culture or RT-PCR [20]. However, viral culture or RT-PCR has limitations, as they require isolation of replicating virus. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Different respiratory viruses induce virus-specific gene expression in the host. Recent evidence, including those presented here, suggests that genetically related isolates of influenza virus induce strain-specific host gene regulation in several animal models. Here, we identified systemic strain-specific gene expression signatures in ferrets infected with pandemic influenza A/California/07/2009, A/Mexico/4482/2009 or seasonal influenza A/Brisbane/59/2007. Using uncorrelated shrunken centroid classification, we were able to accurately identify the infecting influenza strain with a combined gene expression profile of 10 selected genes, independent of the severity of disease. Another gene signature, consisting of 7 genes, could classify samples based on lung pathology. Furthermore, we identified a gene expression profile consisting of 31 probes that could classify samples based on both strain and severity of disease. Thus, we show that expression-based analysis of non-infected tissue enables distinction between genetically related influenza viruses as well as lung pathology. These results open for development of alternative tools for influenza diagnostics.
    PLoS ONE 07/2012; 7(7):e40743. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0040743 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w. e l s e v i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / d i a g m i c r o b i o Loeffelholz, 2010; Uyeki et al., 2009). Serologic assays for 2009 H1N1 also suffered from low sensitivity and could only be used to diagnose 2009 H1N1 retrospectively (Veguilla et al., 2011). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) can be considered the gold standard for detection of influenza viruses due to its high sensitivity and specificity. Roche has developed the RealTime ready Influenza A/H1N1 Detection Set, consisting of a generic influenza virus A PCR targeting the M2 gene (M2 PCR) and a specific PCR targeting the hemagglutinin (HA) of A/H1N1-pdm09 (HA PCR, 2009 H1N1), with the intention to make a reliable, rapid, and simple test to detect and quantify 2009 H1N1 in clinical samples. We evaluated this kit against the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (USCDC)/World Health Organization real-time PCR for influenza virus using 419 nose and throat swabs from 210 patients collected in 3 large hospitals in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. In the per-patient analysis, when compared to CDC PCR, the sensitivity and specificity of the M2 PCR were 85.8% and 97.6%, respectively; the sensitivity and specificity of HA PCR were 88.2% and 100%, respectively. In the per-sample analysis, the sensitivity and specificity in nose swabs were higher than those in throat swabs for both M2 and HA PCRs. The viral loads as determined with the M2 and HA PCRs correlated well with the Ct values of the CDC PCR. Compared with the CDC PCR, the kit has a reasonable sensitivity and very good specificity for the detection and quantification of influenza A virus and A/H1N1-pdm09. However, given the current status of 2009 H1N1, a kit that can detect all circulating seasonal influenza viruses would be preferable.
    Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease 07/2012; 74(2):131-6. DOI:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.06.003 · 2.46 Impact Factor
Show more